Skip to main content
Log in

Extraction of PCR-amplifiable DNA from a variety of biological samples with uniform success rate

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Conservation Genetics Resources Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study describes the comparison of three DNA extraction protocols for successful extraction of PCR amplifiable quality DNA from bones, antlers and feces samples of Sambar deer (Rusa unicolor). Three different DNA extraction protocols were compared in this study including Phenol–Chloroform (PC), column based Qiagen kit, and Guanidine hydrochloride (Gu-HCl) based in-house method. The effectiveness of the protocols was compared for higher success rate of PCR amplification from the extracted DNA. This study highlights that silica based indigenous DNA extraction protocol using Gu-HCl chaotropic salts yields better quality DNA with higher PCR amplification success rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  • Gupta SK, Verma SK, Singh L (2005) Molecular insight into a wildlife crime: the case of a peafowl slaughter. Forensic Sci Int 154:214–217

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta SK, Thangaraj K, Singh L (2011) Identification of the source of ivory idol by DNA analysis. J Forensic Sci 56:1343–1345

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta SK, Thangaraj K, Singh L (2012) Molecular insight into suspected food crime cases: a study to determine the legitimacy of meat by DNA typing. Biol Biomed Rep 2:171–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Höss M, Pääbo S (1993) DNA extraction from Pleistocene bones by a silica-based purification method. Nucleic Acids Res 21:3913–3914

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rohland N, Hofreiter M (2007a) Ancient DNA extraction from bones and teeth. Nat Protoc 2:1756–1762

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rohland N, Hofreiter M (2007b) Comparison and optimization of ancient DNA extraction. Biotechniques 42:343–352

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma SK, Singh L (2003) Novel universal primers establish identity of enormous number of animal species for forensic application. Mol Ecol Notes 3:28–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wehausen JD, Ramey RR II, Epps CW (2004) Experiments in DNA extraction and PCR amplification from bighorn sheep faeces: the importance of DNA extraction method. J Hered 95:503–509

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Ministry of Environment and Forest, Govt. of India through the Grant-in-Aid to WII. We thank to the Director, Dean, and Nodal Officer (Forensic Cell) of WII for their support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandeep Kumar Gupta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gupta, S.K., Kumar, A. & Hussain, S.A. Extraction of PCR-amplifiable DNA from a variety of biological samples with uniform success rate. Conservation Genet Resour 5, 215–217 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-012-9772-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-012-9772-9

Keywords

Navigation