Conservation Genetics Resources

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 435–438 | Cite as

Fourteen new microsatellite markers for the Visayan tarictic hornbill (Penelopides panini) and their cross-species applicability among other endangered Philippine hornbills

  • Svenja Sammler
  • Katja Havenstein
  • Ralph Tiedemann
Technical Note

Abstract

Fourteen microsatellite markers were isolated and characterized for the endangered Visayan tarictic hornbill (Penelopides panini, Aves: Bucerotidae). In an analysis of 76 individuals, the number of alleles per locus varied from one to 12. Expected and observed heterozygosity ranged from 0.00 to 0.87 and from 0.00 to 0.89, respectively. All primers also amplify microsatellite loci in Luzon tarictic hornbill (Penelopides manillae), Mindanao tarictic hornbill (Penelopides affinis), the critically endangered Walden’s hornbill (Aceros waldeni) and the near-threatened writhed hornbill (Aceros leucocephalus). Two loci which are monomorphic in P. panini were found polymorphic in at least one of the other species. These 14 new microsatellite markers specifically developed for two genera of Philippine hornbills, in combination with those already available for the hornbill genera Buceros and Bucorvus, comprise a reasonable number of loci to genetically analyse wild and captive populations of these and probably other related, often endangered hornbills.

Keywords

Aceros Bucerotidae Cross-species amplification Microsatellites Penelopides Philippine hornbills 

References

  1. BirdLife International (2011) IUCN Red List for birds. http://www.birdlife.org
  2. Chamutpong S, Saito D, Viseshakul N, Nishiumi I, Poonswad P, Ponglikitmongkol M (2009) Isolation and characterization of microsatellite markers from the great hornbill, Buceros bicornis. Mol Ecol Resour 9(2):591–593PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Excoffier L, Lischer HEL (2010) Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour 10:564–567PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Paulus KB, Tiedemann R (2003) Ten polymorphic autosomal microsatellite loci for the eider duck Somateria mollissima and their cross-species applicability among waterfowl species (Anatidae). Mol Ecol Notes 3:250–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Seutin G, White B, Boag P (1991) Preservation of avian blood and tissue samples for DNA analyses. Can J Zool 69:82–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson B, Wills D, Shipley P (2004) MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4:535–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Svenja Sammler
    • 1
  • Katja Havenstein
    • 1
  • Ralph Tiedemann
    • 1
  1. 1.Unit of Evolutionary Biology/Systematic Zoology, Institute of Biochemistry and BiologyUniversity of PotsdamPotsdamGermany

Personalised recommendations