Conservation Genetics Resources

, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 577–579 | Cite as

Characterization of 10 polymorphic microsatellite markers for the purple martin, Progne subis

  • Abby A. Stanley
  • Allie M. Graham
  • Richard H. Wagner
  • Eugene S. Morton
  • Malcolm D. Schug
Technical Note

Abstract

The purple martin is a large North American swallow that suffered a severe population crash in the 20th century due to nesting competition from invasive species. We screened an enriched DNA library for microsatellites from purple martins (Progne subis subis). Ten loci consistently amplified and were polymorphic with an allele range of 2–19 and observed heterozygosity ranged from 0.31 to 0.93. Two loci are sex-linked, and two additional loci failed to meet Hardy–Weinberg expectations likely due to the presence of null alleles. These polymorphic microsatellite loci can be used for studies of genetic diversity, population structure, and relatedness, all of which have been suggested to determine the impact of substantial regional declines in population density.

Keywords

Purple martin Progne subis Microsatellite Genetic marker Genetic variation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the Purple Martin Conservation Society, and The Biology Department, UNCG for their generous support of this work. Travis Glen kindly provided the biotin labeled probes. Some of this work partially fulfilled the requirements for a Masters of Science thesis at University of North Carolina Greensboro (AA Stanley).

References

  1. Baker AJ, Greenslade AD, Darling LM, Finlay JC (2008) High genetic diversity in the blue-listed British Colombia population of the purple martin maintained by multiple sources of immigrants. Conserv Genet 9:495–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown CR (1981) The impact of starlings on purple martin populations in unmanaged colonies. Am Birds 35:266–268Google Scholar
  3. Copley D, Fraser D, Finlay JC (1999) Purple Martins, Progne subis: a British Columbian success story. Can Field Nat 113:226–229Google Scholar
  4. Doughty R, Fergus R (2002) The purple martin. The Univ. Texas Press 99Google Scholar
  5. Glenn TC, Schable NA (2005) Isolating microsatellite DNA loci. Methods Enzymol 395:202–222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hunt PD (2003) The purple martin in New Hampshire: historical and current status and proposed conservation measures. Report to the New Hampshire fish and game department, nongame and endangered species program. New Hampshire Audubon, ConcordGoogle Scholar
  7. Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC (2007) Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol 16:1099–1106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Laughlin SB, Kibbe DP (1985) The Atlas of Breeding Birds of Vermont. University Press of New England. Hanover, New Hampshire, USAGoogle Scholar
  9. Liu K, Muse SV (2005) PowerMaker: An integrated analysis environment for genetic maker analysis. Bioinformatics 21:2128PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Sauer JR, Hines JE, Fallon J (2004) The North American Breeding Bird Survey, Results Anaysis 1966–2003.Version 2004.1, USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, LaurelGoogle Scholar
  11. Stanley AA (2008) Extra-pair copulation-seeking behavior in purple martins (Progne subis subis): The relatedness hypothesis. MS thesis, University of North Carolina GreensboroGoogle Scholar
  12. Untergasser A, Nijveen H, Rao X, Bisseling T, Geurts R, Leunissen JAM (2007) Primer3Plus, an enhanced web interface to Primer3. Nuc Acids Res 35:W71–W74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Veit RR, Petersen WR (1993) Birds of Massachusetts. Massachusetts Audobon Society, LincolnGoogle Scholar
  14. Wagner RH, Schug MD, Morton ES (1996) Condition-dependent control of paternity by female Purple Martins: implications for coloniality. Beh Ecol Sociobiol 38:379–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Weir B (1990) Genetic data analysis: methods for discrete population genetic data. Sinauer Associates, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  16. Zeransksi JD, Baptist TR (1990) Connecticut Birds. University Press of New England, HanoverGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abby A. Stanley
    • 1
  • Allie M. Graham
    • 1
  • Richard H. Wagner
    • 2
    • 3
  • Eugene S. Morton
    • 4
  • Malcolm D. Schug
    • 1
  1. 1.Biology DepartmentUniversity of North Carolina GreensboroGreensboroUSA
  2. 2.Konrad Lorenz Institute for Ethology, Austrian Academy of SciencesViennaAustria
  3. 3.Department of Integrative Biology and EvolutionKonrad Lorenz Institute for Ethology, University of Veterinary Medicine ViennaViennaAustria
  4. 4.Smithsonian InstitutionWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations