Abstract
We developed 20 polymorphic microsatellite loci by 5′-anchored PCR and constructing a microsatellite-enriched genomic library. The number of alleles per locus ranged from two to twelve, and observed and expected heterozygosities from 0.2357 to 1.0000 and from 0.4156 to 0.9169, respectively. Seven loci deviated from the HWE in the sampled population, null alleles were found in four loci, and gamete linkage disequilibrium between two loci was significant. These microsatellite markers will be useful for the study of population structure and genetic diversity of M. nipponense.
References
Feng JB, Li JL (2008) Twelve polymorphic microsatellites in Oriental river prawn, Macrobrachium nipponense. Mol Ecol Resour 8:986–988
Fisher PJ, Gardner RC, Richardson TE (1996) Single locus microsatellites isolated using 5′ anchored PCR. Nucl Acids Res 24:4369–4371
Fu H, Gong Y, Wu Y, Xu P, Wu C (2004) Artificial interspecific hybridization between Macrobrachium species. Aquaculture 232:215–223
Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P (2004) micro-checker: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4:535–538
Yeh FC, Boyle TJB (1997) Population genetic analysis of co-dominant and dominant markers and quantitative traits. Belg J Bot 129:157
Zane L, Bargelloni L, Patarnello T (2002) Strategies for microsatellite isolation: a review. Mol Ecol 11:1–16
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Program for High Technology Research and Development in China (2008AA101008), Shandong Province Breeding Project for Agricultural Organisms (2007LZ013), and Shandong Province Natural Science Foundation (Y2008D32).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Yan Zhao and Hui Wang are contributed equally.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, Y., Wang, H., Ji, X. et al. Isolation and characterization of 20 polymorphic microsatellite markers in Macrobrachium nipponense . Conservation Genet Resour 2 (Suppl 1), 137–139 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-010-9263-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-010-9263-9