Advertisement

Isolation of microsatellites via enrichment and a sequence tagged method in a South American lizard with suspected parental care, Liolaemus leopardinus

  • Andrew R. Murphy
  • Michael G. Gardner
  • Stanley F. Fox
Technical Note

Abstract

We used an enrichment and a sequence tagged microsatellite method (STM) to isolate 11 novel di and tri microsatellites for the high altitude living lizard Liolaemus leopardinus. These loci were trialled in 61 individuals from a single population. Seven loci conformed to Hardy–Weinberg expectations and were in linkage equilibrium. The 7 loci displayed intermediate levels of polymorphism exhibiting between 2 and 10 alleles per locus, with observed heterozygosity values ranging from 0.328 to 0.745. These markers will be useful in population level analyses and in the potential identification of complex social structure and parental care in this species.

Keywords

Sociality Microsatellite enrichment leopardinus Parental care 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the assistance and guidance from researchers at the Evolutionary Biology Unit of the South Australian Museum and Alison Fitch from Biological Science, Flinders University.

References

  1. Fox S, Shipman P (2003) Social behaviour at high and low elevations: environmental release and phylogenetic effects in Liolaemus. In: Fox S, McCoy J, Baird T (eds) Lizard social behaviour. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 311–352Google Scholar
  2. Gardner MG, Cooper SJB, Bull CM, Grant WN (1999) Isolation of microsatellite loci from a social lizard, Egernia stokesii, using a modified enrichment procedure. J Hered 90:301–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gardner MG, Delphs L, Smith A, Dudaniec R, Sanchez J (2008) Tiliqua rugosa microsatellites: isolation via enrichment and characterisation of loci for multiplex PCR in T. rugosa and the endangered T. adelaidensis. Conserv Genet 9:233–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gemmell N, Akiyama S (1996) An efficient method for the extraction of DNA from vertebrate tissues. Trends Genet 12:338–339CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Glenn TC, Schable NA (2005) Isolating microsatellite DNA loci. Methods Enzymol 395:202–222CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. IUCN (2008) 2008 IUCN red list of threatened species. www.iucnredlist.org. Downloaded on 19 March 2009
  7. Keiper FJ, Hayden MJ, Wallwork H (2006) Development of sequence tagged microsatellites (STM’s) for the barley scald pathogen Rhynchosporium secalis. Mol Ecol Notes 6:543–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk EB, Pemberton JM (1998) Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol Ecol 7:639–655CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Meglécz E (2006) MICROFAMILY: a computer program for detecting flanking region similarities among different microsatellite loci. Mol Ecol Notes 7(1):18–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Rousset F (2007) GENEPOP’007; a complete reimplementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8:103–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew R. Murphy
    • 1
  • Michael G. Gardner
    • 1
  • Stanley F. Fox
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Biological SciencesFlinders UniversityAdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.Department of ZoologyOklahoma State UniversityStillwaterUSA

Personalised recommendations