Advertisement

Journal of Medicine and the Person

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 75–81 | Cite as

The meaning of everything: communication at the end of life

  • Lori A. RoscoeEmail author
  • Jillian A. Tullis
Original Article

Abstract

Communication about end-of-life care is increasingly recognized as a core clinical skill, but doctors are often unprepared to have these conversations. Crisis situations at the end of life, such as when a hospitalized patient with a poor prognosis requests that “everything” be done, pose even greater communicative challenges. Such decisions are often regarded as a demand for care that may be burdensome or even harmful, rather than the start of an important conversation about values and goals. Situations such as this have prompted the development of prescriptive approaches to communicating with patients, which have limitations since they focus more on the physicians’ message than on developing a relationship with the patient or eliciting the meaning of the illness and its treatment. Current models of communication are less about accurate transmission of information and more about the ways in which communication constitutes our social world. Thus, the goal of communication training for physicians should be less about tools and scripts, and more about doctors learning to engage patients in conversation. We suggest strategies for promoting dialogue to more effectively explore the concerns and misunderstandings that might underlie decisions to “do everything.”

Keywords

End of life Treatment preferences Doctor–patient communication Clinical communication training 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Dr. Eric M. Eisenberg, Dean of the College of Arts & Sciences, University of South Florida, for his helpful comments on this manuscript.

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Greene HR (2013) Do everything. Narrat Inq Bioeth 3:275–280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Center to Advance Palliative Care (CAPC) (2012) Growth of palliative care in US hospitals 2012 snapshot. http://www.capc.org. Accessed 1 March 2014
  3. 3.
    NHPCO Facts and Figures: Hospice Care in America (2013) National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization, Alexandria. http://www.nhpco.org/hospice-statistics-research-press-room/facts-hospice-and-palliative-care. Accessed 1 March 2014
  4. 4.
    Quill TE, Arnold R, Back AL (2009) Discussing treatment preferences with patients who want “everything”. Ann Intern Med 151:345–349PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lama DJ (2013) If your heart stopped tonight. The Atlantic. 25 October 2013Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Curtis JR, Back AL, Ford DW, Downey L, Shannon SE et al (2013) Effect of communication skills training for residents and nurse practitioners on quality of communication with patients with serious illness. JAMA 310:2271–2281PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Emanuel LL, von Gunten CF, Ferris FD (1999) Education for physicians on end-of-life care (EPEC) curriculum. Institute for Ethics at the American Medical Association and The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Back A, Arnold RM, Baile WF, Tulsky JA, Fryer-Edwards K (2005) Approaching difficult communication tasks in oncology. CA: Cancer J Clin 55:164–177Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eggly SS, Penner L, Albrecht TL, Cline RJ, Foster T, Naughton M et al (2006) Discussing bad news in the outpatient oncology clinic: rethinking current communication guidelines. J Clin Oncol 24:716–719PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eggly SS, Albrecht TL, Kelly K, Prigerson HG, Sheldon LK, Studts J (2009) The role of the clinician in cancer communication. J Health Commun 14:66–75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Baile WF, Buckman R, Lenzi R, Glober G, Beale EA, Kudelka AP (2000) SPIKES—a six step protocol for delivering bad news: application to the patient with cancer. Oncologist 5:302–311PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Buckman R (1992) How to break bad news: a guide for health care professionals. The Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Quill TE (2000) Perspectives on care at the close of life: initiating end-of-life discussions with seriously ill patients—addressing the “elephant in the room”. JAMA 284:2502–2507PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    The A (2002) Palliative care and communication: Experiences in the clinic. Open University Press, BuckinghamGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Roscoe LA, Tullis JA, Reich RR, McCaffrey JC (2013) Beyond good intentions and patient perceptions: competing definitions of effective communication in head and neck cancer care at the end of life. Health Commun 28:183–192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kalanthi P (2014) How long have I got left? The New York Times. 26 January 2014Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Christakis NA (2001) Death foretold: prophecy and prognosis in medical care. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Broyard, A. (1990) Doctor talk to me. The New York Times. 26 August 1990Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tannen D (2005) Conversational style: analyzing talk among friends. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    McNeil B, Pauke S, Sox H, Tversky A (1982) On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. New Engl J Med 306:1259–1262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Quill CM, Halpern S (2012) Deciphering the appropriateness of defaults: the need for domain-specific evidence. J Med Ethics 38:713–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kressel LM, Chapman GB, Leventhal E (2007) The influence of default options on the expression of end of life treatment preferences in advance directives. J Gen Int Med 22:1007–1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gilligan TD, Sekeres MA (2014) Can doctors be taught how to talk to patients? The New York Times. http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/02/27/can-doctors-be-taught-how-to-talk-to-patients? Accessed 27 Feb 2014
  24. 24.
    Craig RT (2001) Communication. In: Sloane TO (ed) Encyclopedia of rhetoric. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 125–137Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Craig RT (1999) Communication theory as a field. Commun Theory 9:119–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Burger M (2004) To think about research is to think about humans. Afr Journal Stud 25:373–379Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Albrecht TL, Penner LA, Cline RJW, Eggly SS, Ruckdeschel JC (2009) Studying the process of clinical communication: issues of context, concepts, and research directions. J Health Commun 14:47–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mishler EG (1984) The discourse of medicine: dialectics of medical interviews, vol 3. Greenwood Publishing Group, Santa BarbaraGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Barton E (2007) Situating end-of-life decision making in a hybrid ethical frame. Commun Med 4:131–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wolff, M. (2013) A life worth ending. The New York Times Sunday Magazine. 20 May 2013Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zaros MC, Curtis JR, Silveira MJ, Elmore JG (2013) Opportunity lost: end-of-life discussions in cancer patients who die in the hospital. J Hosp Med 8:334–340PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Seymour J (2007) Commentary 1. ‘Quality of life to the end’. Commun Med 4:117–118PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of CommunicationUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA
  2. 2.University of San DiegoSan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations