Advertisement

Electrocatalysis

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 388–399 | Cite as

Microwave-Irradiation Polyol Synthesis of PVP-Protected Pt–Ni Electrocatalysts for Methanol Oxidation Reaction

  • Ntombizodwa R. Mathe
  • Manfred R. Scriba
  • Rirhandzu S. Rikhotso
  • Neil J. Coville
Original Research

Abstract

Bimetallic Pt–Ni nanoparticles were synthesized for use as electrocatalysts for the methanol oxidation reaction using a cost-effective microwave-irradiation synthesis procedure that offers precise temperature control. By varying the concentration of Ni in the Pt matrix, it was demonstrated that the electrocatalytic activity of the particles declined as the Ni content was increased, with a 50:50 Pt:Ni mixture giving the best performance. This in turn showed that the Pt electrocatalytically active surface area was affected by the incorporation of Ni atoms into the Pt lattice. No further calcination of the microwaved catalysts was required resulting in the synthesis of novel and highly active catalysts, which possessed higher activity than some commercially available Pt catalysts. The catalysts also exhibited good CO resistance and long-term stability behavior.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Nanoparticles Fuel cells Platinum Methanol oxidation reaction CO electrooxidation 

References

  1. 1.
    Z. Peng, H. Yang, Designer platinum: Control of shape, composiiton in alloy, nanostructure and electrocatalytic properties. Nano Today 4, 143–169 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. Wang, T. Xie, Y. Li, Nanocrystals: Solution-based synthesis and applications as nanocatalysts. Nano Res. 2(1), 30–46 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. Antolini, J. Perez, The renaissance of unsupported nanostructured catalysts for low-temperature fuel cells: From the size to the shape of metal nanostructures. J. Mater. Sci. 46, 4435–4457 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    W. Tu, H. Liu, Continuous synthesis of colloidal metal nanoclusters by microwave irradiation. Chem. Mater. 12, 564–567 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Y.-J. Zhu et al., Microwave-assisted synthesis of single-crystalline Telluruin nanorods and nanowires in ionic liquids. Angew. Chem. 116, 1434–1438 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. Higuchi et al., Simple preparation of Au nanoparticles and their application to Au Core/Pt Shell catalysts for oxygen reduction reaction. Electrocatalysis 3(3), 274–283 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Komarneni et al., Microwave-polyol process for Pt and Ag nanoparticles. Langmuir 18, 5959–5962 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    W. Yu, W. Tu, H. Liu, Synthesis of nanoscale platinum colloids by microwave dielectric heating. Langmuir 15, 6–9 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. Vollath, D.V. Szabó, The microwave plasma process—a versatile process to synthesize nanoparticulate materials. J. Nanopart. Res. 8, 417–428 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A.N. Grace, K. Pandian, One pot synthesis of polymer protected Pt, Pd, Ag and Ru nanoparticles and nanoprisms under reflux and microwave mode of heating in glycerol—a comparative study. Mater. Chem. Phys. 104, 191–198 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    F. Bensebaa et al., Tunable platinum-ruthenium nanoparticle properties using microwave synthesis. J. Mater. Chem. 14, 3378–3384 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    W. Tu, H. Liu, Rapid synthesis of nanoscale colloidal metal clusters by microwave irradiation. J. Mater. Chem. 10, 2207–2211 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    R.R. Adzic, Platinum monolayer electrocatalysts: Tunable activity, stability, and self-healing properties. Electrocatalysis 3(3), 163–169 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    K.-W. Park et al., Chemical and electronic effects of Ni in Pt–Ni and Pt–Ru/Ni alloy nanoparticles in methanol electrooxidation. J. Phys. Chem. B 106, 1869–1877 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    S.-H. Wu, D.-H. Chen, Synthesis and characterization of nickel nanoparticles by hydrazine reduction in ethylene glycol. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 259(2), 282–286 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    P.R. Makgwane, S.S. Ray, Efficient room temperature oxidation of cyclohexane over highly active hetero-mixed WO3/V2O5 oxide catalyst. Catal. Commun. 54, 118–123 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    N.R. Mathe et al., The effect of reducing agents on the electronic, magnetic and electrocatalytic properties of Thiol-capped Pt–co and Pt–Ni nanoparticles. Electrocatalysis 6, 274–285 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    A.S. Arico et al., An XPS study on oxidation states of Pt and its alloys with Co and Cr and its relevance to electroreduction of oxygen. Appl. Surf. Sci. 172, 33–40 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    J.W. Guo et al., Preparation and characterization of a PtRu/C nanocatalyst for direct methanol fuel cells. Electrochim. Acta 51, 754–763 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    M.C. Biesinger et al., Resolving surface chemical states in XPS analysis of first row transition metals, oxides and hydroxides: Cr, Mn, Fe, Co and Ni. App. Surf. Sci. 257, 2717–2730 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    I.G. Casella, M.R. Guascito, M.G. Sannazzaro, Voltammetric and XPS investigations of nickel hydroxide electrochemically dispersed on gold surface electrodes. J. Electroanal. Chem. 462, 202–210 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    A.P. Grosvenor et al., New interpretations of XPS spectra of nickel and oxides. Surf. Sci. 600, 1771–1779 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    M.C. Biesinger et al., X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic chemical state quantification of mixed nickel metal, oxide and hydroxide systems. Surf. Interface Anal. 41, 324–332 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    J.E. Castle, Use of “shake-up”satellites in photoelectron spectra for analysis of oxide layers on metals. Nat. Phys. Sci. 234, 93–95 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    K.S. Kim, N. Winograd, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic binding energy shifts due to matrix in alloys and small supported metal nanoparticles. Chem. Phys. Lett. 30, 91–95 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    T. Vidakovic, M. Christov, K. Sundmacher, The use of CO stripping for in situ fuel cell catalyst characterization. Electrochim. Acta 52, 5606–5613 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    L.-X. Ding et al., Hierachical Pd-Sn alloy nanosheet dendrites: An economical and highly active catalyst for ethanol electrooxidation. Nat Sci Rep 3, 1–7 (2013)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    H.A. Gasteiger et al., CO electrooxidation on well-characterized Pt-Ru alloys. J. Phys. Chem. 98, 617–625 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    L.G.S. Pereira, V.A. Paganin, E.A. Ticianelli, Investigation of the CO tolerance mechanism at several Pt-based bimetallic anode electrocatalysts in a PEM fuel cell. Electrochim. Acta 54, 1992–1998 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Q. Jiang et al., Promoting effect of Ni in PtNi bimetallic electrocatalysts for the methanol oxidation reaction in alakaline medium: Experimental and density functional theory studies. J. Phys. Chem. C 114, 19714–19722 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Y. Xu et al., Composition-tunable Pt-Co alloy nanoparticle networks: Facile room-temperature synthesis and supportless electrocatalytic applications. Chem. Phys. Chem. 13, 2601–2609 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    F. Maillard et al., Effect of the structure of Pt-Ru/C particles on COad monolayer vibrational properties and electrooxidation kinetics. Electrochim. Acta 53, 811–822 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    J.S. Spendelow et al., Electrooxidation of adsorbed CO on Pt(111) and Pt(111)/Ru in alkaline media and comparison with results from acidic media. J. Electroanal. Chem. 568, 215–224 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    S. Sun et al., Single-atom catalysis using Pt–graphene achieved through atomic layer deposition. Sci. Rep. 3, 1775 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    T. Ramulifho et al., Fast microwave-assisted solvothermal synthesis of metal nanoparticles (Pd, Ni, Sn) supported on sulfonated MWCNTs: Pd-based bimetallic catalysts for ethanol oxidation in alkaline medium. Electrochim. Acta 59, 310–320 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    T.-Y. Yung, J.-Y. Lee, L.-K. Liu, Nanocomposite for methanol oxidation: Synthesis and characterization of cubic Pt nanoparticles on graphene sheets. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 14, 035001 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    N.R. Mathe, M.R. Scriba, N.J. Coville, Methanol oxidation reaction activity of microwave-irradiated and heat-treated Pt–Co and Pt–Ni nano-electrocatalysts. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 39(33), 18871–18881 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    H. Okamoto, W. Kon, Y. Mukouyama, Five current peaks in voltammograms for oxidation of formic acid, formaldehyde and methanol on platinum. J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 15659–15666 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    A. Murthy, A. Manthiram, Application of derivative voltammetry in the analysis of methanol oxidation reaction. J. Phys. Chem. C 116, 3827–3832 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    N.V. Long et al., Effets of heat treatment and poly(vinylpyrollidone) (PVP) polymer on electrocatalytic activity of polyhedral Pt nanoparticles towards methanol oxidation. Coll. Poly. Sci. 289, 1373–1386 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    T. Iwasita, in Handbook of Fuel Cells-Fundamentals, Technology and Applications, ed. by W. Vielstich, H. A. Gasteiger, A. Lamm. Methanol and CO Electrooxidation (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, 2003), pp. 603–624Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ntombizodwa R. Mathe
    • 1
    • 2
  • Manfred R. Scriba
    • 1
  • Rirhandzu S. Rikhotso
    • 1
  • Neil J. Coville
    • 2
  1. 1.DST-CSIR National Centre for Nano-Structured MaterialsCouncil for Scientific and Industrial ResearchPretoriaSouth Africa
  2. 2.Molecular Sciences Institute, School of ChemistryUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations