Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Measuring Mindfulness in Black Americans: A Psychometric Validation of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Mindfulness Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Black Americans disproportionately experience higher levels of chronic stress. Mindfulness is a promising, cost-effective option for reducing stress and related mental health outcomes, such as depression and anxiety. The Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) is one of the most widely used tools to measure mindfulness; however, Black American samples have been underrepresented in validation studies of the FFMQ. Consequently, the validity of the FFMQ within Black Americans has received minimal attention. The present study assessed the psychometric properties and nomological network of the original 39-item FFMQ (FFMQ-39) and the short form 15-item FFMQ (FFMQ-15) among a non-clinical, Black American sample in the United States.

Method

In a longitudinal study, 586 Black Americans completed either the FFMQ-39 or the FFMQ-15 at two time points one month apart, as well as measures of the constructs in mindfulness’ nomological network and demographic attributes.

Results

Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a 5-factor structure in both questionnaires. Both questionnaires had good fit indices (RMSEA < 0.06, SRMR < 0.08, CFI > 0.92, TFI > 0.92) and demonstrated strong test–retest reliability, expected associations with nomological network variables, and invariance across ethnic heritage, ethnic identity, everyday discrimination, lifetime discrimination, skin tone, depression level, gender, mindfulness meditation experience, and household income.

Conclusions

The results indicate that both the FFMQ-39 and the FFMQ-15 can validly and reliably measure mindfulness in a non-clinical, Black American sample. These findings contribute to cultural generalizability and mindfulness assessment within underrepresented populations.

Preregistration

The analytic plan was pre-registered on the Open Science Framework. Registration: https://osf.io/95v4m

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

De-identified data is available at https://osf.io/jq3ys/?view_only=f4b60658da0b4f05850f1383da5b1da9

References

Download references

Funding

This research was funded by a University of Toronto (UTSC) Research Competitiveness Grant awarded to B.Q.F. and A.J.S. G.N.O. was funded by a Ford Foundation Predoctoral Fellowship. S.A. was funded by NSF Graduate Research Fellowship (DGE 1752814), grants from the National Institute on Aging (R01-AG018436, R01-AG067622, and R01-AG064006), and the Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center (OAIC) at Northwestern University (P30AG059988). A.J.S. was supported by a National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health Grant, K23AT009208 as well as Mind and Life Varela Grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

G.N.O.: methodology, validation, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, visualization, project administration. B.Q.F.: conceptualization, investigation, resources, project administration, writing—review and editing, supervision, funding acquisition. S.A.: methodology, validation, writing—review and editing. A.M.R.: investigation, writing—review and editing. S.L.: investigation, writing—review and editing. A.J.S.: conceptualization, investigation, resources, project administration, writing—review and editing, supervision, funding acquisition.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gold N. Okafor.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

The study received ethics approval from the Internal Review Board at the University of Toronto.

Informed Consent

Participants read information about the study and the study’s participation. Participants who agreed to participate provided informed consent via an online consent form.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 52 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Okafor, G.N., Ford, B.Q., Antonoplis, S. et al. Measuring Mindfulness in Black Americans: A Psychometric Validation of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire. Mindfulness 14, 565–581 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-023-02072-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-023-02072-0

Keywords

Navigation