Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Acceptability and Effectiveness of an 8-week Mindfulness Program in Early- and Mid-adolescent School Students: a Randomised Controlled Trial

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Mindfulness Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Mindfulness-based programmes (MBPs) show potential for universal prevention in schools, given that they target shared risk factors underpinning common mental health disorders. High-quality research in youth remains limited, but suggests that MBPs may be less effective in early- versus mid-adolescents.

Methods

This randomised controlled trial tested the acceptability of an 8-week MBP in year 8 (Mage 13.7) and year 10 (Mage 15.5) students (N = 434; 48.2% female) and compared outcomes (mindfulness, depression, anxiety, eating disorder risk factors, wellbeing) to normal curricular controls.

Results

Levels of acceptability were moderate and did not differ by age band. For younger students, there were no differences at post-intervention for mindfulness students compared to controls (Cohen’s d < .22) but at 3-month follow-up, the mindfulness group were worse in wellbeing (Cohen’s d =  − .25; 95% CI − .49, − .01) and two aspects of mindfulness (Awareness of External Environment, d =  − .30; − .55, − .06; Decentering and Nonreactivity, d =  − .39; − .63, − .15). For older students, there were no significant differences between the intervention and control groups at post-intervention (Cohen’s d < .17) or follow-up (d < .22).

Conclusions

We suggest that the use of formal meditation in unscreened conscript early teens may be unwise. Further research is needed to identify acceptable and effective age appropriate modifications of MBPs for early- and mid-adolescents before they can be supported as universal interventions in schools. Suggestions are made for ongoing research in this area.

Trial Registration: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ANZCTR 12,617,000,471,381

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the Channel 7 Children’s Research Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CJ: designed the study, recruited schools, delivered the intervention, undertook the data analyses and wrote the manuscript. TW: collaborated with the design, analysis, writing and editing of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine Johnson.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Social and Behavioural Research Ethics Committee of Flinders University (Adelaide, South Australia; project number 2169) and the Department of Education (South Australia; project number CS-17-000747-1.1). Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants in the study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 24 KB)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 28 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Johnson, C., Wade, T. Acceptability and Effectiveness of an 8-week Mindfulness Program in Early- and Mid-adolescent School Students: a Randomised Controlled Trial. Mindfulness 12, 2473–2486 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-021-01716-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-021-01716-3

Keywords

Navigation