Skip to main content
Log in

The Relationship of Two Types of Shame with Meditation Experience

Mindfulness Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

In shame, the self is evaluated negatively by oneself, in measures of shame-proneness, or from the perceived perspective of others, as external shame. Both types of shame are associated with anxiety and depression. Mindfulness and self-compassion are associated with shame, and some intervention approaches for shame involve meditation. Aims of the study were to predict each type of shame from mindfulness and self-compassion and to investigate the relationship between meditation practice and each type of shame.

Methods

A correlational design was used to investigate relationships of external shame and shame-proneness with mindfulness, self-compassion, and meditation practice. Two participant samples, of undergraduate psychology students and participants recruited from mindfulness-related websites, completed an online survey.

Results

For both samples, facets of mindfulness predicted external shame and shame-proneness. Self-compassion, administered to the website sample only, also predicted external shame and shame-proneness. Frequency and duration of meditation sessions predicted shame-proneness, but not external shame, in both samples. Meditation did not predict mindfulness or self-compassion for the website sample, but frequency of sessions predicted the Nonjudging facet of mindfulness for the undergraduate sample.

Conclusions

Meditation may be protective against shame-proneness, but other intervention practices may be needed to protect against external shame.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

Kathleen Wright recruited participants in Sample 1.

Funding

Funding was received from the School of Psychology, The University of Adelaide, for recruitment of sample 1. No other funding was received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Proeve.

Ethics declarations

Approvals were provided by The University of Adelaide’s Human Research Ethics Sub-Committee for the School of Psychology. All adult participants provided informed consent by participation in the online survey.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Human Research Ethics Sub-Committee of the School of Psychology and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparative ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 34 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Proeve, M.J. The Relationship of Two Types of Shame with Meditation Experience. Mindfulness 11, 2765–2778 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-020-01489-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-020-01489-1

Keywords

Navigation