Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Feasibility and Effectiveness of a Mindfulness-Based Program Vs. Relaxation in the Treatment of Burnout in Brazilian Primary Care Providers: a Mixed-Methods Pragmatic Controlled Study

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Mindfulness Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Mindfulness-based programs (MBPs) have been tested as promising alternatives for managing stress in Primary health care (PHC) providers. The study compared the feasibility and efficacy of an MBP on burnout symptoms in Brazilian PHC providers with a briefer relaxation-based program and with a nonactive control group.

Methods

A nonrandomized controlled trial was conducted with mixed-methods evaluation on self-reported symptoms of burnout, and positive and negative affection, mindfulness, self-compassion, decentering, and rumination. The MBP arm (MF) (n = 62) consisted of eight mindfulness sessions, the relaxation arm (RE) (n = 35) attended four relaxation sessions, and the control arm (CO) (n = 45) comprised a waitlist group.

Results

The reduction in exhaustion was significantly higher in MF compared with CO (d = − 0.58; p = 0.020), and in RE compared with CO (d = − 0.63; p = 0.017). MF was significantly superior to CO for reducing cynicism (d = − 0.48; p = 0.024). There was also significant superiority of MF compared with CO in positive and negative affect, observing, describing, nonreacting, mindfulness, identification, and rumination. MF and RE were significantly superior to CO for reducing criticism and isolation. Finally, MF was significantly superior to RE and CO for improving nonjudging, self-kindness, and decentering.

Conclusions

Mindfulness and relaxation may be efficacious in addressing burnout symptoms in PHC providers, probably with synergistic effects and distinct mechanisms of action. Further studies with a randomized design and larger sample sizes should be performed to confirm these preliminary data and to test whether a mix of mindfulness and relaxation techniques would be more effective than either program on its own.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The individual anonymized participant data are available for any analytical purpose that may be related to the aims of the present study upon reasonable request made to the corresponding author.

References

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Brazil (grant number 303413/2014-0) and DS was supported by a PhD fellowship from the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) (grant number: 1457323). JM-M is supported by the Wellcome Trust Grant (104908/Z/14/Z).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DS codesigned and conducted the study, assisted with the data analyses, and wrote the first version of the manuscript. SA analyzed the data and wrote part of the results. EF collaborated on the study design. SF collaborated on the study design. JMM assisted with the data analyses, review of the literature, and the writing and editing of the paper. GL assisted with the qualitative data transcription. LP conducted part of the study. AG collaborated with the study design and review of the literature. TS collaborated on the study design. JGC collaborated on the study design. MD designed and supervised the study and collaborated in the writing and editing of the manuscript. All authors revised and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcelo Demarzo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This study was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki. It was submitted and approved by the Federal University of São Paulo Research Ethics Committee (ref. number: CAAE 30431114.6.0000.5505), respecting all the criteria for all research conducted on human beings.

Informed Consent

All the study participants evidenced their agreement by signing the informed consent form. Participants were given a random code with which they could withdraw from the study at any time after they had filled out the questionnaires, on request.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic Supplementary Material

ESM 1

(DOC 73 kb)

ESM 2

(DOC 80 kb)

ESM 3

(DOC 97 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sopezki, D., Andreoni, S., Montero-Marin, J. et al. Feasibility and Effectiveness of a Mindfulness-Based Program Vs. Relaxation in the Treatment of Burnout in Brazilian Primary Care Providers: a Mixed-Methods Pragmatic Controlled Study. Mindfulness 11, 2573–2588 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-020-01472-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-020-01472-w

Keywords

Navigation