Tailoring Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Skill Coaching in the Moment Through Smartphones: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial
- 229 Downloads
There is growing evidence for the efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) interventions delivered through smartphones, but research has not yet focused on how to optimize such interventions. One benefit of mobile interventions is the ability to adapt content based on in-the-moment variables. The current randomized controlled trial evaluated whether an ACT app that tailored skill coaching based on in-the-moment ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) would be more efficacious than the same app where skill coaching was random or an EMA-only condition. A sample of 69 adults interested in using a self-help app were randomized to one of three app conditions and used the app for the following 4 weeks. Results indicated equivalently high user satisfaction with the tailored versus random apps. Participants used the EMA-only app the most and the tailored app the least, but overall adherence was adequate. Participants in the tailored app improved significantly more on psychological distress and positive mental health relative to the random app and EMA-only conditions. However, no differences were found between the random app and EMA-only conditions on outcomes. Between-group differences over time were also found on psychological inflexibility, but this appeared to be primarily due to a lower rate of improvement in the random app condition relative to both tailored and EMA-only. Overall, these results suggest that tailoring ACT skill coaching based on in-the-moment variables leads to greater efficacy.
KeywordsmHealth Psychological inflexibility Mindfulness Micro-interventions Just-in-time adaptive interventions
MEL was the principal investigator including designing and overseeing the conduct of the study, conducting data analyses, and writing the manuscript. JH assisted with the design of the study, was the primary research coordinator for day-to-day operation of the study, and assisted in preparing the manuscript. RAC was a co-investigator who assisted in designing the study, conducting data analyses, and preparing the manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Dr. Levin is a research associate with Contextual Change LLC, a company that focuses on developing commercial online programs to address college student mental health. Mr. Jack Haeger and Dr. Rick Cruz declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by the Utah State University Institutional Review Board.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Bond, F. W., Hayes, S. C., Baer, R. A., Carpenter, K., Orcutt, H. K., Waltz, T., & Zettle, R. D. (2011). Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II: a revised measure of psychological flexibility and acceptance. Behavior Therapy, 42, 676–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: a “quick and dirty” usability scale. In P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester, & I. L. McClelland (Eds.), Usability evaluation in industry (pp. 189–194). London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
- Hahn, E. A., DeVellis, R. F., Bode, R. K., Garcia, S. F., Castel, L. D., Eisen, S. V., … PROMIS Cooperative Group. (2010). Measuring social health in the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): item bank development and testing. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 19(7), 1035–1044.Google Scholar
- Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (2011). Acceptance and commitment therapy: the process and practice of mindful change. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Levin, M. E., Herbert, J. D., & Forman, E. M. (2017). Acceptance and commitment therapy: a critical review to guide clinical decision making. In D. McKay, J. Abramowitz, & E. Storch (Eds.), Treatments for psychological problems and syndromes (pp. 413–432). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Lovibond, S. H., & Lovibond, P. F. (1995). Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (2nd ed.). Sydney: Psychology Foundation of Australia.Google Scholar
- Mattila, E., Lappalainen, R., Välkkynen, P., Sairanen, E., Lappalainen, P., Karhunen, L., et al. (2016). Usage and dose response of a mobile acceptance and commitment therapy app: secondary analysis of the intervention arm of a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research mHealth and uHealth, 4, e90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nahum-Shani, I., Smith, S. N., Spring, B. J., Collins, L. M., Witkiewitz, K., Tewari, A., & Murphy, S. A. (2018). Just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) in mobile health: key components and design principles for ongoing health support. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 52, 446–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pew Research Center. (2017). Mobile fact sheet. Retrieved June 26, 2017, from http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/mobile/.
- Smyth, J. M. & Heron, K.E. (2016). Is providing mobile interventions “just-in-time” helpful? An experimental proof of concept study of just-in-time intervention for stress management. Proceedings of the IEEE Wireless Health Conference, 89–95.Google Scholar
- Verbeke, G., & Molenberghs, G. (2000). Linear mixed models for longitudinal data. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
- Wackerly, D. D., Mendenhall, W., & Scheaffer, R. L. (2008). Mathematical statistics with applications. Belmont: Thomson Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar