Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Unconditional Self-Kindness Scale: Assessing the Ability to Respond with Kindness to Threats to the Self

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Mindfulness Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite psychology’s awareness of the benefit of viewing oneself positively, there is a dearth of scales on self-kindness, with one notable example in a subscale of self-compassion. The purpose of this study was to develop and test a unique measure of self-kindness. The measure is called the Unconditional Self-Kindness (USK) scale because it assesses self-kindness in the context of common and potential harmful threats to the self. These threats include (1) being criticized and rejected by another person, (2) failing or making a mistake, and (3) becoming aware of personal flaws and imperfection. A total of 1452 undergraduate participants filled out the USK scale and a range of mental health, risk, and protective factors. The results showed that the USK scale was internally consistent, loaded on a single latent variable, demonstrated test-retest reliability, and was related in the expected directions to the mental health, psychological well-being, and variety of risk and protective factor measures. In addition, the USK scale still predicted several mental health predictors when controlling for protective factors including grit, hope, resilience, self-esteem, and social support. Finally, mean USK scores were significantly higher in men than women and in Native American participants than all other ethnicities and significantly lower in non-Hispanic White participants than all other ethnicities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abad, C., Fearday, A., & Safdar, N. (2010). Adverse effects of isolation in hospitalized patients: A systematic review. Journal of Hospital Infection, 76(2), 97–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abela, J. R., & Seligman, M. E. (2000). The hopelessness theory of depression: A test of the diathesis-stress component in the interpersonal and achievement domains. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 24(4), 361–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F. (1998). The self. In D. T. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 680–740). New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyce, P., & Parker, G. (1989). Development of a scale to measure interpersonal sensitivity. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 23(3), 341–351.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 126–162). Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, J. M., & Haaga, D. A. (2001). Unconditional self-acceptance and psychological health. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 19(3), 163–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciarrochi, J., Parker, P., Kashdan, T. B., Heaven, P. C., & Barkus, E. (2015). Hope and emotional well-being. A six-year study to distinguish antecedents, correlates, and consequences. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(6), 520–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24(4), 385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, K. F., Kallen, M. A., & Amtmann, D. (2009). Having a fit: Impact of number of items and distribution of data on traditional criteria for assessing IRT’s unidemensionality assumptions. Quality of Life Research, 18(4), 447–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, T., Lobel, S. A., & McLeod, P. L. (1991). Effects of ethnic group cultural differences on cooperative and competitive behavior on group task. Academy of Management Journal, 34(4), 827–847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2014). Self-determination theory. Retrieved from http://www.selfdeterminationtheory.org/theory/.

  • Diener, E., Emmons, R., Larsen, R., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087–1101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egan, S. J., Wade, T. D., & Shafran, R. (2011). Perfectionism as a transdiagnostic process: A clinical review. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(2), 203–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, C. J., King, J. A., & Brewin, C. R. (2015). Demonstrating mood repair with a situation-based measure of self-compassion and self-criticism. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 88(4), 351–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flett, G., & Hewitt, P. L. (2002). Perfectionism: Theory, research, and treatment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Flett, G. L., Besser, A., Davis, R. A., & Hewitt, P. L. (2003). Dimensions of perfectionism, unconditional self-acceptance, and depression. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 21(2), 119–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, J. P., & Eifert, G. H. (2007). The mindfulness and acceptance workbook for anxiety. Oakland: New Harbinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, J., & Wheeler, L. (2009). On being rejected a meta-analysis of experimental research on rejection. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(5), 468–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Germer, C. (2009). The mindful path to self-compassion: Freeing yourself from destructive thoughts and emotions. New York: The Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. (2013). Marital interaction: Experimental investigations. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J., & Krokoff, L. J. (1989). Marital interaction and satisfaction: A longitudinal view. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57(1), 47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Pankey, J., & Gregg, J. (2007). Acceptance and commitment therapy. In R. DiTomasso & E. Gosch (Eds.), Anxiety disorders: A Practitioner’s guide to comparative treatments (pp. 110–136). New York: Springer Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, S. G., Grossman, P., & Hinton, D. E. (2011). Loving-kindness and compassion meditation: Potential for psychological interventions. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(7), 1126–1132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, M. E., Waite, L. J., Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2004). A short scale for measuring loneliness in large surveys: Results from two population-based studies. Research on Aging, 26(6), 655–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iacoboni, M. (2009). Imitation, empathy, and mirror neurons. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 653–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Henry Holt.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Lincolnwood: Scientific Software International, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. A., Kaniskan, B., & McCoach, D. B. (2015). The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociological Methods & Research, 44(3), 486–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruger, L. J., Li, C., Kimble, E., Ruah, R., Stoianov, D., & Krishnan, K. (2016). Impact of repeated failing a high school exit exam: Voices of English language learners. The Urban Review, 48(3), 463–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. A. (1988). Love-styles. In R. J. Sternberg & M. L. Barnes (Eds.), The psychology of love (pp. 38–67). New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Limburg, K., Watson, H. J., Hagger, M. S., & Egan, S. J. (2016). The relationship between perfectionism and psychopathology: A meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 73(10), 1301–1326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López, A., Sanderman, R., Smink, A., Zhang, Y., van Sonderen, E., Ranchor, A., & Schroevers, M. J. (2015). A reconsideration of the self-compassion Scale’s total score: Self-compassion versus self-criticism. PLoS One, 10(7), e0132940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martell, C. R., Addis, M. E., & Jacobson, N. S. (2001). Depression in context: Strategies for guided action. New York: WW Norton & Co..

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. (1968). Toward a psychology of being. Princeton: Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mecca, A. M., Smelser, N. J., & Vasoconcellos, J. (1989). The social importance of self-esteem. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthen, B. O., & Muthen, L. K. (2001). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles: Muthen & Muthen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neff, K. (2003a). Self-compassion: An alternative conceptualization of a healthy attitude toward oneself. Self and Identity, 2(2), 85–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neff, K. (2003b). The development and validation of a scale to measure self-compassion. Self and Identity, 2(3), 223–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neff, K. (2011). Self-compassion: Stop beating yourself up and leave insecurity behind. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2001). Gender differences in depression. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(5), 173–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, 32(3), 396–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, R. C., Rasmussen, S., & Hawton, K. (2010). Predicting depression, anxiety and self-harm in adolescents: The role of perfectionism and acute life stress. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48(1), 52–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, T. G., & Joseph, S. (2006). Development of a self-report measure of unconditional positive self-regard. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 79(4), 557–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poupart, L. M. (2003). The familiar face of genocide: Internalized oppression among American Indians. Hypatia, 18, 86–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist’s view of psychotherapy. Boston: Houghton, Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and adolescent self-image. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • RStudio Team. (2015). RStudio: Integrated development for R. Boston: RStudio, Inc Retrieved from http://www.rstudio.com/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Frederick, C. (1997). On energy, personality, and health: Subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being. Journal of Personality, 65(3), 529–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salzberg, S. (1995). Loving-kindness: The revolutionary art of happiness. Boston: Shambhala Publications, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherbourne, C. D., & Stewart, A. L. (1991). The MOS social support survey. Social Science & Medicine, 32(6), 705–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. W., Dalen, J., Wiggins, K., Tooley, E., Christopher, P., & Bernard, J. (2008). The brief resilience scale: Assessing the ability to bounce back. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 15(3), 194–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. R., Harris, C., Anderson, J. R., Holleran, S. A., Irving, L. M., Sigmon, S. T., … Harney, P. (1991). The will and the ways: Development and validatoin of an individual-differences measure of hope. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(4), 570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stillman, T. F., Baumeister, R. F., Lambert, N. M., Crescioni, A. W., DeWall, C. N., & Fincham, F. D. (2009). Alone and without purpose: Life loses meaning following social exclusion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 686–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swann, W. B. (1990). To be adored or to be known?: The interplay of self-enhancement and self-verification. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrento (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 408–448). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windle, G., Bennett, K. M., & Noyes, J. (2011). A methodological review of resilience measurement scales. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 9(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, C. Y. (2002). Evaluating cutoff criteria of model fit indices for latent variable models with binary and continuous outcomes. Unpublished dissertation. Retrieved from http://www.statmodel.com/download/Yudissertation.pdf.

  • Yves, R. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zautra, A. J., Guarnaccia, C. A., & Dohrenwend, B. P. (1986). Measuring small life events. The American Journal of Community Psychology, 15(6), 629–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. (1983). The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67, 361–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131, USA

    Bruce W. Smith, Anne Guzman & Kelly Erickson

Authors
  1. Bruce W. Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anne Guzman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kelly Erickson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

BWS: selected measures, analyzed descriptive data and conducted the exploratory factor analyses, wrote introduction and discussion. AG: oversaw all years of data collection and wrote the method section. KE: conducted the confirmatory factor analyses, significantly edited paper drafts, handled all aspect of the revise and resubmit process.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kelly Erickson.

Ethics declarations

IRB Approval, Ethical Approval

The study was approved by the UNM Main Campus Institutional Review Board. There were no adverse events reported. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

All participants read and signed an UNM IRB approved consent form.

Conflict of Interest

Bruce W. Smith declares that he has no conflict of interest. Anne Guzman declares that she has no conflict of interest. Kelly Erickson declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Appendix

Appendix

The Unconditional Self-Kindness Scale

Instructions: Answer these questions as honestly as you can by circling one number on the following scale:

Not at all 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 A Great Deal

  1. 1.

    How much are you patient and tolerant with yourself when you are criticized or rejected by another person?

  2. 2.

    How much are you loving and kind to yourself when you become aware of your personal flaws and imperfections?

  3. 3.

    How much are you patient and tolerant with yourself when you fail or make a mistake?

  4. 4.

    How much are you loving and kind to yourself when you are criticized or rejected by another person?

  5. 5.

    How much are you patient and tolerant with yourself when you become aware of your personal flaws and imperfections?

  6. 6.

    How much are you loving and kind to yourself when you fail or make a mistake?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Smith, B.W., Guzman, A. & Erickson, K. The Unconditional Self-Kindness Scale: Assessing the Ability to Respond with Kindness to Threats to the Self. Mindfulness 9, 1713–1722 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-018-0912-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-018-0912-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation