The Mindful Personality II: Exploring the Metatraits from a Cybernetic Perspective
Relationships between dispositional mindfulness and the personality metatraits, stability and plasticity, remain unexplored despite continued efforts to more accurately characterize associations between dispositional mindfulness and personality. The metatraits are theorized to constitute basic requirements for biological survival and their expression is believed to be a strong determinant of well-being. As such, this study used path analysis to explore associations between dispositional mindfulness, the metatraits, and psychological well-being in a sample of 403 American adults. Results indicate that dispositional mindfulness is principally associated with stability, or the capacity to sustain currently operative schemas and goals. Results further suggest a positive relationship between dispositional mindfulness and plasticity, or the tendency to flexibly adapt to changing circumstances. A more granular investigation of these associations demonstrated that the facets of dispositional mindfulness are differentially related with the metatraits. Ultimately, the metatraits were found to fully mediate the relationship between dispositional mindfulness and psychological well-being.
KeywordsMindfulness Personality Personality metatraits Stability Plasticity Well-being
AWH designed and executed the study, performed the data analyses, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. AKB collaborated in the writing and editing of the final manuscript. ELG collaborated with the data analysis plan and writing of the manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interests
Adam Hanley, Anne Baker, and Eric Garland declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Eric Garland was supported in the preparation of this manuscript by Grant R01DA042033 from NIDA and Grant R61AT009296 from NCCIH.
This research was approved by Florida State University’s Institutional Review Board.
Informed Consent Statement
To ensure informed consent, all participants actively selected that they consented to take part in the study before being able to proceed to the survey questions.
- Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on psychological science, 6(1), 3–5.Google Scholar
- Bullis, J. R., Bøe, H. J., Asnaani, A., & Hofmann, S. G. (2014). The benefits of being mindful: Trait mindfulness predicts less stress reactivity to suppression. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 45(1), 57–66.Google Scholar
- Dolan, R. J. (2002). Emotion, cognition, and behavior. Science, 298(5596), 1191–1194.Google Scholar
- Fogarty, F. A., Lu, L. M., Sollers, J. J., Krivoschekov, S. G., Booth, R. J., & Consedine, N. S. (2015). Why it pays to be mindful: trait mindfulness predicts physiological recovery from emotional stress and greater differentiation among negative emotions. Mindfulness, 6(2), 175–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Garland, E. L., Baker, A. K., & Howard, M. O. (2017). Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement Reduces Opioid Attentional Bias Among Prescription Opioid-Treated Chronic Pain Patients. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 8(4), 000–000.Google Scholar
- Garland, E. L., Fredrickson, B., Kring, A. M., Johnson, D. P., Meyer, P. S., & Penn, D. L. (2010). Upward spirals of positive emotions counter downward spirals of negativity: Insights from the broaden-and-build theory and affective neuroscience on the treatment of emotion dysfunctions and deficits in psychopathology. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(7), 849–864.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Gyamtso, K. (1994). Progressive stages of meditation on emptiness. Oxford: Longchen Foundation.Google Scholar
- Hadash, Y., Plonsker, R., Vago, D. R., & Bernstein, A. (2016). Experiential self-referential and selfless processing in mindfulness and mental health: Conceptual model and implicit measurement methodology. Psychological assessment, 28(7), 856–869.Google Scholar
- Hanley, A. W. & Garland, E. L. (2017). The mindful personality: a meta-analysis from a cybernetic perspective. Mindfulness.Google Scholar
- Hodgins, H. S., & Adair, K. C. (2010). Attentional processes and meditation. Consciousness and cognition, 19(4), 872–878.Google Scholar
- Kabat-Zinn, J. (1994). Wherever you go, there you are: mindfulness meditation in everyday life. New York: Hyperion.Google Scholar
- Macy, J. (1991). Mutual causality in Buddhism and general systems theory: the dharma of natural systems. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
- Mason, W., & Suri, S. (2012). Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Behavior research methods, 44(1), 1–23.Google Scholar
- Peterson, J. B. (1999). Maps of meaning: the architecture of belief. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Rāhula, W. (1974). What the Buddha taught. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
- Von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory: foundations, development, applications. New York: George Braziller.Google Scholar
- Wenk-Sormaz, H. (2005). Meditation can reduce habitual responding. Alternative therapies in health and medicine, 11(2), 42–58.Google Scholar