Advertisement

Mindfulness

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 597–609 | Cite as

The Effect of Mindfulness on Relationship Satisfaction via Perceived Responsiveness: Findings from a Dyadic Study of Heterosexual Romantic Partners

  • Kathryn C. Adair
  • Aaron J. Boulton
  • Sara B. Algoe
ORIGINAL PAPER
  • 477 Downloads

Abstract

Trait mindfulness has been linked to romantic relationship satisfaction, but what are the mechanisms of action that give rise to this association? The current study tested the possible mechanism of perceived responsiveness in a partner (i.e., perceiving that a romantic partner is understanding, validating, and caring) who had the opportunity to provide support. We hypothesized that individuals higher in trait mindfulness would rate their partners higher in responsiveness, which in turn would predict greater relationship satisfaction in the rater. We also examined a cross-dyad path, in which partners of more mindful participants would view them as more responsive and thus have greater relationship satisfaction. In a laboratory study, each member of 127 heterosexual couples (n = 254) completed measures of trait mindfulness and relationship satisfaction. Couple members later took turns discussing a personal concern and then reported their partner’s responsiveness during that conversation. An actor-partner interdependence mediation model revealed that perceived responsiveness mediated the mindfulness and relationship satisfaction association. Participants higher in Non-judgment and Observing facets of trait mindfulness rated their partners higher in responsiveness, which predicted relationship satisfaction. In addition, participants higher in Acting with Awareness both (1) rated their partners as higher in responsiveness, and (2) were perceived by their partners as more responsive, with both paths mediating effects on relationship satisfaction. The results for Acting with Awareness, however, should be interpreted with caution, due to poor model fit. Thus, mindfulness may facilitate relationship satisfaction through heightened perception of partners’ responsiveness both within and across dyads.

Keywords

Mindfulness Trait mindfulness Relationships Relationship satisfaction Perceived responsiveness Responsiveness 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are particularly grateful to Ansley Foster, Alysa Dalbo, and Ayush Kaushish for conducting the behavior coding. We would also like to express our sincere appreciation for feedback on this manuscript from the graduate student members of the third author’s lab as well as Patrick Dwyer and Barbara Fredrickson. The names of the hardworking members of the research teams who contributed to this project may be found on the website of the third author.

Funding

This work was supported by the Expanding the Science and Practice of Gratitude Project run by UC Berkeley’s Greater Good Science Center in partnership with UC Davis with funding from the John Templeton Foundation, awarded to the third author.

Author Contributions

KCA: developed the research question and hypotheses, analyzed the data, and wrote the paper. AJB: developed the analytic plan, analyzed the data, wrote sections of the methods and results, and edited the manuscript. SBA: designed and executed the study, helped develop the hypotheses and the data analytic plan, and assisted in writing and editing the manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. All participants provided informed consent.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

12671_2017_801_MOESM1_ESM.docx (14 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 14 kb)

References

  1. Algoe, S. B., Fredrickson, B. L., & Gable, S. L. (2013). The social functions of the emotion of gratitude via expression. Emotion, 13(4), 605–609.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032701.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Algoe, S. B., Kurtz, L. E., & Hilaire, N. M. (2016). Putting the ‘you’ in ‘thank you’: examining other-praising behavior as the active relational ingredient in expressed gratitude. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(7), 658–666.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616651681.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Aron, A., & Aron, E. N. (1997). Self-expansion motivation and including other in the self. In S. Duck & S. Duck (Eds.), Handbook of personal relationships: theory, research and interventions (2nd ed., pp. 251–270). Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
  4. Atkinson, B. J. (2013). Mindfulness training and the cultivation of secure, satisfying couple relationships. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 2(2), 73–94.  https://doi.org/10.1037/cfp0000002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baas, M., Nevicka, B., & Ten Velden, F. S. (2014). Specific mindfulness skills differentially predict creative performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(9), 1092–1106.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214535813.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13(1), 27–45.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191105283504.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Barnes, S., Brown, K., Krusemark, E., Campbell, W., & Rogge, R. D. (2007). The role of mindfulness in romantic relationship satisfaction and responses to relationship stress. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 33(4), 482–500.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2007.00033.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Becerra, R., Dandrade, C., & Harms, C. (2016). Can specific attentional skills be modified with mindfulness training for novice practitioners? Current Psychology: A Journal For Diverse Perspectives On Diverse Psychological Issues.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9454-y.
  9. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bihari, J. N., & Mullan, E. G. (2014). Relating mindfully: a qualitative exploration of changes in relationships through mindfulness-based cognitive therapy. Mindfulness, 5(1), 46–59.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-012-0146-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., et al. (2004). Mindfulness: a proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11(3), 230–241.  https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy/bph077.Google Scholar
  12. Bluth, K., Roberson, P. E., Billen, R. M., & Sams, J. M. (2013). A stress model for couples parenting children with autism spectrum disorders and the introduction of a mindfulness intervention. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 5(3), 194–213.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown, K., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822–848.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Carson, J. W., Carson, K. M., Gil, K. M., & Baucom, D. H. (2004). Mindfulness-based relationship enhancement. Behavior Therapy, 35(3), 471–494.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(04)80028-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Collins, N. L., & Feeney, B. C. (2000). A safe haven: an attachment theory perspective on support seeking and caregiving in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(6), 1053–1073.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.6.1053.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Cook, W. L., & Kenny, D. A. (2005). The actor-partner interdependence model: a model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 101–109.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250444000405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Debrot, A., Cook, W. L., Perrez, M., & Horn, A. B. (2012). Deeds matter: daily enacted responsiveness and intimacy in couples’ daily lives. Journal of Family Psychology, 26(4), 617–628.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028666.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Feldman, G., Lavallee, J., Gildawie, K., & Greeson, J. M. (2016). Dispositional mindfulness uncouples physiological and emotional reactivity to a laboratory stressor and emotional reactivity to executive functioning lapses in daily life. Mindfulness, 7(2), 527–541.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-015-0487-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Friese, M., & Hofmann, W. (2016). State mindfulness, self-regulation, and emotional experience in everyday life. Motivation Science, 2(1), 1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gable, S. L., Gonzaga, G. C., & Strachman, A. (2006). Will you be there for me when things go right? Supportive responses to positive event disclosures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(5), 904–917.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.904.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hendrick, S. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 93–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hertz, R. M., Laurent, H. K., & Laurent, S. M. (2015). Attachment mediates effects of trait mindfulness on stress response to conflict. Mindfulness, 6(3), 483–489.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-014-0281-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hodgins, H. S., & Adair, K. C. (2010). Attentional processes and meditation. Consciousness and Cognition, 19, 39–878.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2010.04.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Johns, K. N., Allen, E. S., & Gordon, K. C. (2015). The relationship between mindfulness and forgiveness of infidelity. Mindfulness, 6(6), 1462–1471.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-015-0427-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jones, K. C., Welton, S. R., Oliver, T. C., & Thoburn, J. W. (2011). Mindfulness, spousal attachment, and marital satisfaction: a mediated model. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 19(4), 357–361.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480711417234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kabat-Zinn, J. (1993). Mindfulness meditation: health benefits of an ancient Buddhist practice. In D. Goleman & J. Garin (Eds.), Mind⁄body medicine (pp. 259–276). Yonkers, NY: Consumer Reports.Google Scholar
  27. Kabat-Zinn, J. (1994). Wherever you go, there you are: mindfulness meditation in everyday life. New York: Hyperion.Google Scholar
  28. Karremans, J. C., Schellenkens, M. P., & Kappen, G. (2015). Bridging the science of mindfulness and romantic relationships: a theoretical model and research agenda. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868315615450.
  29. Khaddouma, A., Gordon, K. C., & Bolden, J. (2015a). Zen and the art of dating: mindfulness, differentiation of self, and satisfaction in dating relationships. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 4(1), 1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1037/cfp0000035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Khaddouma, A., Gordon, K. C., & Bolden, J. (2015b). Zen and the art of sex: Examining associations among mindfulness, sexual satisfaction, and relationship satisfaction in dating relationships. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 30(2), 268–285.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2014.992408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Khaddouma, A., Gordon, K. C., & Strand, E. B. (2016). Mindful mates: a pilot study of the relational effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction on participants and their partners. Family Process.  https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12226.
  32. Kozlowski, A. (2013). Mindful mating: exploring the connection between mindfulness and relationship satisfaction. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 28(2), 92–104.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2012.748889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Laurenceau, J., Barrett, L. F., & Rovine, M. J. (2005). The interpersonal process model of intimacy in marriage: a daily-diary and multilevel modeling approach. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(2), 314–323.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.19.2.314.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Ledermann, T., Macho, S., & Kenny, D. A. (2011). Assessing mediation in dyadic data using the actor-partner interdependence model. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 18(4), 595–612.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2011.607099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Maisel, N. C., & Gable, S. L. (2009). The paradox of received social support: the importance of responsiveness. Psychological Science, 20(8), 928–932.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02388.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Maisel, N. C., Gable, S. L., & Strachman, A. (2008). Responsive behaviors in good times and in bad. Personal Relationships, 15, 317–338.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2008.00201.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McBee, M. (2010). Modeling outcomes with floor or ceiling effects: a brief introduction to the Tobit model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 314–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McGill, J., Adler-Baeder, F., & Rodriguez, P. (2016). Mindfully in love: a meta-analysis of the association between mindfulness and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Human Sciences and Extension, 4, 89–101.Google Scholar
  39. Muthén, B. O. (1989). Tobit factor analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 42(2), 241–250.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1989.tb00913.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.) [Computer software manual]. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  41. Pakenham, K. I., & Samios, C. (2013). Couples coping with multiple sclerosis: a dyadic perspective on the roles of mindfulness and acceptance. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 36(4), 389–400.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-012-9434-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Pepping, C. A., & Duvenage, M. (2016). The origins of individual differences in dispositional mindfulness. Personality and Individual Differences, 93, 130–136.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pepping, C. A., & Halford, W. K. (2016). Mindfulness and couple relationships. In E. Shonin, W. Van Gordon, M. D. Griffiths, E. Shonin, W. Van Gordon, & M. D. Griffiths (Eds.), Mindfulness and Buddhist-derived approaches in mental health and addiction (pp. 391–411). Cham: Springer International Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22255-4_19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Preacher, K. J., & Kelly, K. (2011). Effect size measures for mediation models: quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 93–115.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022658.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Preacher, K. J., & Selig, J. P. (2012). Advantages of Monte Carlo confidence intervals for indirect effects. Communication Methods and Measures, 6(2), 77–98.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2012.679848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Reis, H. T. (2003). A self-report measure of perceived partner responsiveness. Unpublished data, University of Rochester.Google Scholar
  47. Reis, H. T., Clark, M. S., & Holmes, J. G. (2004). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. In D. J. Mashek & A. P. Aron (Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 201–225). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  48. Shapiro, S. L., Schwartz, G. E., & Bonner, G. (1998). Effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction on medical and premedical students. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 21(6), 581–599.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018700829825.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Shaver, P. R., Lavy, S., Saron, C. D., & Mikulincer, M. (2007). Social foundations of the capacity for mindfulness: an attachment perspective. Psychological Inquiry, 18, 264–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Snyder, R., Shapiro, S., & Treleaven, D. (2012). Attachment theory and mindfulness. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 21(5), 709–717.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-011-9522-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Steiger, J. H. and Lind, J. (1980). Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Annual Spring Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City.Google Scholar
  52. Wachs, K., & Cordova, J. V. (2007). Mindful relating: exploring mindfulness and emotion repertoires in intimate relationships. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 33(4), 464–481.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2007.00032.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Welwood, J. (1996). Love and awakening. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  54. Williams, A. M., & Cano, A. (2014). Spousal mindfulness and social support in couples with chronic pain. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 30(6), 528–535.  https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000009.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Williams, M. J., Dalgleish, T., Karl, A., & Kuyken, W. (2014). Examining the factor structures of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire and the self-compassion scale. Psychological Assessment, 26(2), 407–418.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035566.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Wittmann, M., Peter, J., Gutina, O., Otten, S., Kohls, N., & Meissner, K. (2014). Individual differences in self-attributed mindfulness levels are related to the experience of time and cognitive self-control. Personality and Individual Differences, 64, 41–45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.02.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© US Government (outside the USA) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kathryn C. Adair
    • 1
  • Aaron J. Boulton
    • 2
  • Sara B. Algoe
    • 3
  1. 1.Duke University Health SystemDurhamUSA
  2. 2.University of DelawareNewarkUSA
  3. 3.University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations