The Effect of Mindfulness on Relationship Satisfaction via Perceived Responsiveness: Findings from a Dyadic Study of Heterosexual Romantic Partners
- 477 Downloads
Trait mindfulness has been linked to romantic relationship satisfaction, but what are the mechanisms of action that give rise to this association? The current study tested the possible mechanism of perceived responsiveness in a partner (i.e., perceiving that a romantic partner is understanding, validating, and caring) who had the opportunity to provide support. We hypothesized that individuals higher in trait mindfulness would rate their partners higher in responsiveness, which in turn would predict greater relationship satisfaction in the rater. We also examined a cross-dyad path, in which partners of more mindful participants would view them as more responsive and thus have greater relationship satisfaction. In a laboratory study, each member of 127 heterosexual couples (n = 254) completed measures of trait mindfulness and relationship satisfaction. Couple members later took turns discussing a personal concern and then reported their partner’s responsiveness during that conversation. An actor-partner interdependence mediation model revealed that perceived responsiveness mediated the mindfulness and relationship satisfaction association. Participants higher in Non-judgment and Observing facets of trait mindfulness rated their partners higher in responsiveness, which predicted relationship satisfaction. In addition, participants higher in Acting with Awareness both (1) rated their partners as higher in responsiveness, and (2) were perceived by their partners as more responsive, with both paths mediating effects on relationship satisfaction. The results for Acting with Awareness, however, should be interpreted with caution, due to poor model fit. Thus, mindfulness may facilitate relationship satisfaction through heightened perception of partners’ responsiveness both within and across dyads.
KeywordsMindfulness Trait mindfulness Relationships Relationship satisfaction Perceived responsiveness Responsiveness
We are particularly grateful to Ansley Foster, Alysa Dalbo, and Ayush Kaushish for conducting the behavior coding. We would also like to express our sincere appreciation for feedback on this manuscript from the graduate student members of the third author’s lab as well as Patrick Dwyer and Barbara Fredrickson. The names of the hardworking members of the research teams who contributed to this project may be found on the website of the third author.
This work was supported by the Expanding the Science and Practice of Gratitude Project run by UC Berkeley’s Greater Good Science Center in partnership with UC Davis with funding from the John Templeton Foundation, awarded to the third author.
KCA: developed the research question and hypotheses, analyzed the data, and wrote the paper. AJB: developed the analytic plan, analyzed the data, wrote sections of the methods and results, and edited the manuscript. SBA: designed and executed the study, helped develop the hypotheses and the data analytic plan, and assisted in writing and editing the manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. All participants provided informed consent.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Algoe, S. B., Kurtz, L. E., & Hilaire, N. M. (2016). Putting the ‘you’ in ‘thank you’: examining other-praising behavior as the active relational ingredient in expressed gratitude. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(7), 658–666. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616651681.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Aron, A., & Aron, E. N. (1997). Self-expansion motivation and including other in the self. In S. Duck & S. Duck (Eds.), Handbook of personal relationships: theory, research and interventions (2nd ed., pp. 251–270). Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
- Barnes, S., Brown, K., Krusemark, E., Campbell, W., & Rogge, R. D. (2007). The role of mindfulness in romantic relationship satisfaction and responses to relationship stress. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 33(4), 482–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2007.00033.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Becerra, R., Dandrade, C., & Harms, C. (2016). Can specific attentional skills be modified with mindfulness training for novice practitioners? Current Psychology: A Journal For Diverse Perspectives On Diverse Psychological Issues. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9454-y.
- Bluth, K., Roberson, P. E., Billen, R. M., & Sams, J. M. (2013). A stress model for couples parenting children with autism spectrum disorders and the introduction of a mindfulness intervention. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 5(3), 194–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Feldman, G., Lavallee, J., Gildawie, K., & Greeson, J. M. (2016). Dispositional mindfulness uncouples physiological and emotional reactivity to a laboratory stressor and emotional reactivity to executive functioning lapses in daily life. Mindfulness, 7(2), 527–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-015-0487-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Kabat-Zinn, J. (1993). Mindfulness meditation: health benefits of an ancient Buddhist practice. In D. Goleman & J. Garin (Eds.), Mind⁄body medicine (pp. 259–276). Yonkers, NY: Consumer Reports.Google Scholar
- Kabat-Zinn, J. (1994). Wherever you go, there you are: mindfulness meditation in everyday life. New York: Hyperion.Google Scholar
- Karremans, J. C., Schellenkens, M. P., & Kappen, G. (2015). Bridging the science of mindfulness and romantic relationships: a theoretical model and research agenda. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868315615450.
- Khaddouma, A., Gordon, K. C., & Bolden, J. (2015b). Zen and the art of sex: Examining associations among mindfulness, sexual satisfaction, and relationship satisfaction in dating relationships. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 30(2), 268–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2014.992408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Khaddouma, A., Gordon, K. C., & Strand, E. B. (2016). Mindful mates: a pilot study of the relational effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction on participants and their partners. Family Process. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12226.
- McGill, J., Adler-Baeder, F., & Rodriguez, P. (2016). Mindfully in love: a meta-analysis of the association between mindfulness and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Human Sciences and Extension, 4, 89–101.Google Scholar
- Muthén, B. O. (1989). Tobit factor analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 42(2), 241–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1989.tb00913.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.) [Computer software manual]. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- Pepping, C. A., & Halford, W. K. (2016). Mindfulness and couple relationships. In E. Shonin, W. Van Gordon, M. D. Griffiths, E. Shonin, W. Van Gordon, & M. D. Griffiths (Eds.), Mindfulness and Buddhist-derived approaches in mental health and addiction (pp. 391–411). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22255-4_19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Reis, H. T. (2003). A self-report measure of perceived partner responsiveness. Unpublished data, University of Rochester.Google Scholar
- Reis, H. T., Clark, M. S., & Holmes, J. G. (2004). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. In D. J. Mashek & A. P. Aron (Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 201–225). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Steiger, J. H. and Lind, J. (1980). Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Annual Spring Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City.Google Scholar
- Welwood, J. (1996). Love and awakening. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
- Wittmann, M., Peter, J., Gutina, O., Otten, S., Kohls, N., & Meissner, K. (2014). Individual differences in self-attributed mindfulness levels are related to the experience of time and cognitive self-control. Personality and Individual Differences, 64, 41–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.02.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar