The Relationship Between Decentering and Adaptiveness of Response Styles in Reducing Depression
Recent studies have suggested that ruminative and distractive response styles to negative moods could have adaptive and maladaptive consequences, respectively. However, whether there is a common component in the adaptive aspects of ruminative or distractive response styles has not been examined sufficiently. Adaptiveness of ruminative or distractive response styles is considered to be associated with decentering; thus, we investigated the indirect effects of four types of the response style (adaptive/maladaptive aspects of each response style) on depression through decentering. In this study, 241 Japanese undergraduate students (75 men and 166 women) were assessed using the Response Style Scale, the Japanese Version of Experience Questionnaire, and the Japanese Version of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Mediation analyses revealed that decentering fully mediated the effects of adaptive aspects of ruminative and distractive response styles on depression whereas it partially mediated the effects of maladaptive aspects of response styles. These results indicate that the adaptiveness of response styles is influenced by decentering, and it particularly works in the adaptive aspects of ruminative/distractive response styles as a common element. Thus, a possibility is suggested that cultivating decentered perspective is effective in reducing maladaptive aspects of both response styles to negative moods or objects.
KeywordsDecentering Response style Rumination Distraction Depression
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This research was approved by the Ethics Review Committee on Research with Human Subjects of Waseda University.
Statement of Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all the participants included in the study.
- Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., et al. (2004). Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11(3), 230–241.Google Scholar
- Jain, S., Shapiro, S. L., Swanick, S., Roesch, S. C., Mills, P. J., Bell, I., et al. (2007). A randomized controlled trial of mindfulness meditation versus relaxation training: Effects on distress, positive states of mind, rumination, and distraction. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 33(1), 11–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003). Mindfulness-based interventions in context: Past, present, and future. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 144–156.Google Scholar
- Kodama, H., Katayanagi, K., Shimada, H., & Sakano, Y. (1994). The relationship among stress coping with automatic thoughts, state anxiety, and depressive symptoms in college students. Waseda Human Science Research, 7, 14–26.Google Scholar
- Matsumoto, M. (2013). Influences of rumination, meta-mood, and decentering on depression: A survey of university students and vocational school students. Japanese Journal of Applied Psychology, 38(3), 211–221.Google Scholar
- Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Morrow, J. (1993). Effects of rumination and distraction on naturally occurring depressed mood. Cognition and Emotion, 7(6), 561–570.Google Scholar
- Shima, S., Shikano, T., Kitamura, T., & Asai, M. (1985). New self-rating scales for depression. Clinical Psychiatry, 27(6), 717–723.Google Scholar
- Shimazu, N. (2010). Construction of a new response style scale and examination of its reliability and validity. The scientific researches. Educational psychology, 58, 29–39.Google Scholar
- Shimazu, N., Koshikawa, F., & Kondo, I. (2008). Developing a new response styles scale (RSS). In T. P. S. Oei & C. S. Tang (Eds.), Current research & practices on cognitive behaviour therapy in Asia (pp. 8–15). Brisbane: CBT Unit Toowong Private Hospital.Google Scholar
- Wells, A., & Matthews, G. (1994). Attention and emotion: A clinical perspective. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar