, Volume 8, Issue 5, pp 1328–1338 | Cite as

Perception in Romantic Relationships: a Latent Profile Analysis of Trait Mindfulness in Relation to Attachment and Attributions

  • Jonathan G. KimmesEmail author
  • Jared A. Durtschi
  • Frank D. Fincham


To advance understanding of the role of trait mindfulness in attributions for romantic partner transgressions, we examined the direct and indirect associations among attachment, trait mindfulness, and attributions in a sample of 542 young adults in romantic relationships. A latent profile analysis was used to identify four classes of trait mindfulness (i.e., High Mindfulness, Nonjudgmentally Aware, Low Mindfulness, Judgmentally Observing), and a subsequent structural equation model revealed several significant associations among attachment, the classes of trait mindfulness, and benign attributions for partner transgressions. For example, the High Mindfulness class and the Nonjudgmentally Aware class were positively associated with benign attributions. Furthermore, two significant indirect effects emerged. First, heightened attachment anxiety was associated with a decreased probability of being in the Nonjudgmentally Aware class, which was linked to a decrease in benign attributions. Second, avoidant attachment was associated with a decreased probability of membership in the High Mindfulness class, which was linked to a decrease in benign attributions. Areas for future research based on the findings of this study are discussed.


Attachment Attribution Couples Latent profile analysis Trait mindfulness 


Authors’ Contributions

JGK designed and executed the study, performed the statistical analyses, and wrote the manuscript. JAD collaborated with the design of the study and writing of the manuscript. FDF collaborated in the writing and editing of the manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

This study was approved by the appropriate ethics committee and was performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. All individuals gave their informed consent prior to participating in the study.


The data used in this study was collected with funds from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Administration (SAMHSA) and the American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy Minority Fellowship Program (2014 AAMFT MFP Research Grant).


  1. Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13(1), 27–45. doi: 10.1177/1073191105283504.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnhofer, T., Duggan, D. S., & Griffith, J. W. (2011). Dispositional mindfulness moderates the relation between neuroticism and depressive symptoms. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(8), 958–962. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.07.032.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnes, S., Brown, K. W., Krusemark, E., Campbell, W. K., & Rogge, R. D. (2007). The role of mindfulness in romantic relationship satisfaction and responses to relationship stress. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 33(4), 482-500. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2007.00033.x.
  5. Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001). The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test revised version: a study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42(2), 241–251.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bergomi, C., Tschacher, W., & Kupper, Z. (2013). The assessment of mindfulness with self-report measures: existing scales and open issues. Mindfulness, 4(3), 191–202. doi: 10.1007/s12671-012-0110-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss: vol. 3 loss, sadness and depression. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  8. Bravo, A. J., Boothe, L. G., & Pearson, M. R. (2015). Getting personal with mindfulness: a latent profile analysis of mindfulness and psychological outcomes. Mindfulness, 7(2), 1–13. doi: 10.1007/s12671-015-0459-7.Google Scholar
  9. Bray, B. C., Lanza, S. T., & Tan, X. (2015). Eliminating bias in classify-analyze approaches for latent class analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 22(1), 1–11. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2014.935265.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822–848.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cahn, B. R., & Polich, J. (2009). Meditation (Vipassana) and the P3a event-related brain potential. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 72(1), 51–60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.03.013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Carson, J. W., Carson, K. M., Gil, K. M., & Baucom, D. H. (2004). Mindfulness-based relationship enhancement. Behavior Therapy, 35(3), 471–494. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7894(04)80028-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chiesa, A. (2012). The difficulty of defining mindfulness: current thought and critical issues. Mindfulness, 4(3), 255–268. doi: 10.1007/s12671-012-0123-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Christopher, M. S., Neuser, N. J., Michael, P. G., & Baitmangalkar, A. (2012). Exploring the psychometric properties of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire. Mindfulness, 3(2), 124–131. doi: 10.1007/s12671-011-0086-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dykas, M. J., & Cassidy, J. (2011). Attachment and the processing of social information across the life span: theory and evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 137(1), 19–46. doi: 10.1037/a0021367.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. van Emmichoven, I. A., van Ijzendoorn, M. H., de Ruiter, C., & Brosschot, J. F. (2003). Selective processing of threatening information: effects of attachment representation and anxiety disorder on attention and memory. Development and Psychopathology, 15(1), 219–237. doi: 10.1017/S0954579403000129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fincham, F. D., & Bradbury, T. N. (1992). Assessing attributions in marriage: the relationship attribution measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(3), 457–468.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Fraley, R. C., Waller, N. G., & Brennan, K. A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 350–365.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Funk, J. L., & Rogge, R. D. (2007). Testing the ruler with item response theory: increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the Couples Satisfaction Index. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(4), 572–583. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.572.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Gambrel, L. E., & Piercy, F. P. (2015). Mindfulness-based relationship education for couples expecting their first child—part 1: a randomized mixed-methods program evaluation. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 41(1), 5–24. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12066.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hall, J. H., & Fincham, F. D. (2008). The temporal course of self-forgiveness. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 27(2), 174–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heppner, W. L., Kernis, M. H., Lakey, C. E., Campbell, W. K., Goldman, B. M., Davis, P. J., & Cascio, E. V. (2008). Mindfulness as a means of reducing aggressive behavior: dispositional and situational evidence. Aggressive Behavior, 34(5), 486–496.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Ho, N. S., Sun, D., Ting, K. H., Chan, C. C., & Lee, T. (2015). Mindfulness trait predicts neurophysiological reactivity associated with negativity bias: an ERP study. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2015.Google Scholar
  24. Horneffer, K. J., & Fincham, F. D. (1996). Attributional models of depression and marital distress. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(7), 678–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Karremans, J. C., Schellekens, M. P., & Kappen, G. (2015). Bridging the sciences of mindfulness and romantic relationships: a theoretical model and research agenda. Personality and Social Psychology Review. doi: 10.1177/1088868315615450.Google Scholar
  26. Kimmes, J. G., & Durtschi, J. A. (2016). Forgiveness in romantic relationships: the roles of attachment, attributions, and empathy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 42(4), 645–658. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12171.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kimmes, J. G., Durtschi, J. A., Clifford, C. E., Knapp, D. J., & Fincham, F. D. (2015). The role of pessimistic attributions in the association between anxious attachment and relationship satisfaction. Family Relations, 64(4), 547–562. doi: 10.1111/fare.12130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. (2001). The PHQ-9. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16(9), 606–613.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Lawler-Row, K. A., Younger, J. W., Piferi, R. L., & Jones, W. H. (2006). The role of adult attachment style in forgiveness following an interpersonal offense. Journal of Counseling & Development, 84, 493–502. doi: 10.1002/j.1556-6678.2006.tb00434.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lenger, K. A., Gordon, C. L., & Nguyen, S. P. (2016). Intra-individual and cross-partner associations between the five facets of mindfulness and relationship satisfaction. Mindfulness, 1–10. doi: 10.1007/s12671-016-0590-0.
  31. Lo, Y., Mendell, N. R., & Rubin, D. B. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88(3), 767–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2005). Attachment theory and emotions in close relationships: exploring the attachment-related dynamics of emotional reactions to relational events. Personal Relationships, 12(2), 149–168. doi: 10.1111/j.1350-4126.2005.00108.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2012). Adult attachment orientations and relationship processes. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 4(4), 259–274. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-2589.2012.00142.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Miller, P. J., & Rempel, J. K. (2004). Trust and partner-enhancing attributions in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(6), 695–705. doi: 10.1177/0146167203262803.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2012). Mplus user’s guide (Seventh ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  36. Parker, S. C., Watson, B. W., Epel, E. S., & Siegel, D. J. (2015). The science of presence: a central mediator of the interpersonal benefits of mindfulness. In K. W. Brown, R. M. Ryan, & J. D. Creswell (Eds.), Handbook of mindfulness: theory, research, and practice (pp. 245–265). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  37. Pearce, Z. J., & Halford, W. (2008). Do attributions mediate the association between attachment and negative couple communication? Personal Relationships, 15, 155–170. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2008.00191.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pearson, M. R., Lawless, A. K., Brown, D. B., & Bravo, A. J. (2015). Mindfulness and emotional outcomes: identifying subgroups of college students using latent profile analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 33–38. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.009.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Pepping, C. A., O’Donovan, A., & Davis, P. J. (2014). The differential relationship between mindfulness and attachment in experienced and inexperienced meditators. Mindfulness, 5(4), 392–399. doi: 10.1007/s12671-012-0193-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Peters, C. L. O., & Enders, C. (2002). A primer for the estimation of structural equation models in the presence of missing data: maximum likelihood algorithms. Journal of Targeting Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 11(1), 81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sato, T. (2005). The Eysenck personality questionnaire brief version: factor structure and reliability. The Journal of Psychology, 139(6), 545–552. doi: 10.3200/JRLP.139.6.545-552.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sclove, S. L. (1987). Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrika, 52(3), 333–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422–445. doi: 10.1037//1082-989X.7.4.422.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Siegel, D. J. (2007). The mindful brain: reflection and attunement in the cultivation of well-being. New York, NY: WW Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  46. Sümer, N., & Cozzarelli, C. (2004). The impact of adult attachment on partner and self-attributions and relationship quality. Personal Relationships, 11(3), 355–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tan, L. B., Lo, B. C., & Macrae, C. N. (2014). Brief mindfulness meditation improves mental state attribution and empathizing. PloS One, 9(10), e110510.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Vago, D. R. (2014). Mapping modalities of self-awareness in mindfulness practice: a potential mechanism for clarifying habits of mind. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1307(1), 28–42. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00212.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Walsh, J. J., Balint, M. G., Smolira, D. R., Fredericksen, L. K., & Madsen, S. (2009). Predicting individual differences in mindfulness: the role of trait anxiety, attachment anxiety and attentional control. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(2), 94–99. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang, M., & Hanges, P. J. (2011). Latent class procedures: applications to organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 14(1), 24–31. doi: 10.1177/1094428110383988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jonathan G. Kimmes
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jared A. Durtschi
    • 2
  • Frank D. Fincham
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Family and Child SciencesFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA
  2. 2.Kansas State UniversityManhattanUSA

Personalised recommendations