Mindfulness

, Volume 7, Issue 5, pp 1052–1060 | Cite as

The Impact of Mindful Meditation in Nature on Self-Nature Interconnectedness

ORIGINAL PAPER

Abstract

Previous research has shown that mindfulness and spending time in nature are both related to perceived self-nature interconnectedness, with implications for environmental and psychological well-being. More research is needed to better understand the relative influence of mindful meditation and nature exposure on self-nature interconnectedness. In study 1, we replicated evidence for a relationship between mindfulness and self-nature interconnectedness in a sample of Buddhist meditators attending a nature and meditation retreat. In study 2, undergraduate students participated in 3-day nature trips that were randomly assigned to either a meditation condition (which included formal meditation in the mornings) or a non-meditation condition (which did not include formal meditation practices). The results from pre- and post-trip surveys showed that the combined influence of mindful meditation in nature on self-nature interconnectedness is greater than nature exposure that does not include mindful meditation. One focus of the present research was to examine cognitive dimensions of nature connectedness, given that mindfulness meditation is based on cognitive processes such as selective attention. Study 2 revealed three types of concepts underlying self-nature interconnectedness: (1) mental models for behaviors in nature, (2) self-nature categorization, and (3) self-nature associations. In addition, participants who meditated in nature were more likely to foreground nature in their memories of the trip by emphasizing nature rather than other aspects (such as social interactions). Together, the results from the present research suggest that mindful meditation in nature can be used to reestablish or strengthen concepts of self-nature interconnectedness nature for urban adults.

Keywords

Mindfulness Meditation Nature exposure Self-nature interconnectedness 

References

  1. Amel, E. L., Manning, C. M., & Scott, B. A. (2009). Mindfulness and sustainable behavior: pondering attention and awareness as means for increasing green behavior. Ecopsychology, 1(1), 14–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anggoro, F., Medin, D., & Waxman, S. (2010). Language and experience influence children’s biological induction. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 10, 171–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Astuti, R., Solomon, G. E. A., & Carey, S. (2004). Constraints on conceptual development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 69, 1–135.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bang, M., Medin, D., & Atran, S. (2007). Cultural mosaics and mental models of nature. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 13868–13874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  7. Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Emmet Jones, R. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Duvall, J. (2011). Enhancing the benefits of outdoor walking with cognitive engagement strategies. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31, 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hermann, P., Waxman, S. R., & Medin, D. L. (2010). Anthropocentrism is not the first step in children’s reasoning about the natural world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(22), 9979–9984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hofmann, S. G., Sawyer, A. T., Witt, A. A., & Oh, D. (2010). The effect of mindfulness-based therapy on anxiety and depression: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78(2), 169–183.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Howell, A. J., Dopko, R. L., Passmore, H., & Buro, K. (2011). Nature connectedness: associations with well-being and mindfulness. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(2), 166–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jacob, J., & Brinkerhoff, M. (1999). Mindfulness and subjective well-being in the sustainability movement: a further elaboration of multiple discrepancies theory. Social Indicators Research, 46, 341–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jacob, J., Jovic, E., & Brinkerhoff, M. (2009). Personal and planetary well-being: mindfulness meditation, pro-environmental behavior, and personal quality of life in a survey from the social justice and ecological sustainability movement. Social Indicators Research, 93, 275–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jha, A. P., Krompinger, J., & Baime, M. J. (2007). Mindfulness training modifies subsystems of attention. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7(2), 109–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kabat-Zinn, J. (2005). Coming to our senses: healing ourselves and our world though mindfulness. New York: Hyperion.Google Scholar
  16. Kjellgren, A., & Buhrkall, H. (2010). A comparison of the restorative effect of a natural environment with that of a simulated natural environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 464–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Landis, R. L., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Leary, M. R., Tipsord, J. M., & Tate, E. B. (2008). Allo-inclusive identity: incorporating the social and natural worlds into one’s sense of self. In H. Wayment & J. Bauer (Eds.), Transcending self-interest: Psychological explorations of the quiet ego (pp. 137–147). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Levin, W.E., & Unsworth, S.J. (2013). Do humans belong with nature? The influence of personal vs. abstract contexts on human–nature categorization at different stages of development. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 33, 9–13.Google Scholar
  20. Mayer, F. S., & Frantz, C. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: a measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 503–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mayer, F. S., Frantz, C. M., Bruehlman-Senecal, E., & Dolliver, K. (2009). Why is nature beneficial? The role of connectedness to nature. Environment and Behavior, 41, 607–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Medin, D., Waxman, S., Woodring, J., & Washinawatok, K. (2010). Human-centeredness is not a universal feature of young children’s reasoning: culture and experience matter when reasoning about biological entities. Cognitive Development, 25(3), 197–207.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Meiklejohn, J., Phillips, C., Freedman, M., Griffin, M., Biegel, G., Roach, A., & Saltzman, A. (2012). Integrating mindfulness training into K-12 education: fostering the resilience of teachers and students. Mindfulness, 3(4), 291–307.Google Scholar
  24. Nisbet, E. K., & Zelenski, J. M. (2011). Underestimating nearby nature: affective forecasting errors obscure the happy path to sustainability. Psychological Science, 22(9), 1101–1106.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2009). The nature relatedness scale: linking individuals’ connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41, 715–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2011). Happiness is in our nature: exploring nature relatedness as a contributor to subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 303–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Robins, R. W., Hendin, H. M., & Trzesniewski, K. H. (2001). Measuring global self-esteem: construct validation of a single item measure and the Rosenberg self-esteem scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 151–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schultz, P. W. (2001). The structure of environmental concern: concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schultz, P. W., & Tabanico, J. J. (2007). Self, identity, and the natural environment: exploring implicit connections with nature. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(6), 1219–1247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schultz, P. W., Shriver, C., Tabanico, J. J., & Khazian, A. M. (2004). Implicit connections with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sedlmeier, P., Eberth, J., Schwarz, M., Zimmermann, D., Haarig, F., Jaeger, S., & Kunze, S. (2012). The psychological effects of meditation: a meta analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1139–1171.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Tam, K. (2013). Concepts and measures related to connection to nature: similarities and differences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 64–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tang, Y., Ma, Y., Wang, J., Fan, Y., Feng, S., Lu, Q., & … Posner, M.I. (2007). Short-term meditation training improves attention and self-regulation. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(43), 17152–17156.Google Scholar
  34. Unsworth, S. J., Levin, W., Bang, M., Washinawatok, K., Waxman, S. R., & Medin, D. L. (2012). Cultural differences in children’s ecological reasoning and psychological closeness to nature: evidence from Menominee and European-American children. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 12(1–2), 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Viafora, D. P., Mathiesen, S. G., & Unsworth, S. J. (2014). Teaching mindfulness to middle school students and homeless youth in school classrooms. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24, 1179–1191.Google Scholar
  36. Walach, H., Buchheld, N., Buttenmüller, V., Kleinknecht, N., & Schmidt, S. (2006). Measuring mindfulness—The Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI). Personality and Individual Differences, 40(8), 1543–1555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Waxman, S. R., Medin, D. L., & Ross, N. (2007). Folkbiological reasoning from a cross-cultural developmental perspective: early essentialist notions are shaped by cultural beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 43(2), 294–308.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Wolsko, C., & Lindberg, K. (2013). Experiencing connection with nature: the matrix of psychological well-being, mindfulness, and outdoor recreation. Ecopsychology, 5, 80–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Social and Behavioral SciencesDiné CollegeTsaileUSA
  2. 2.San Diego State UniversitySan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations