Advertisement

Mindfulness

, Volume 6, Issue 4, pp 759–766 | Cite as

The Estonian Mindful Attention Awareness Scale: Assessing Mindfulness Without a Distinct Linguistic Present Tense

  • Riin Seema
  • Jordan T. Quaglia
  • Kirk Warren Brown
  • Anna Sircova
  • Kenn Konstabel
  • Arno Baltin
ORIGINAL PAPER

Abstract

The paucity of mindfulness-based interventions and research in Estonia motivated the development of an Estonian Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS). Unlike most languages, the Estonian language lacks a distinctive present tense. This provides a potential challenge for assessing mindfulness, a psychological construct characterized by present-moment awareness. We outline the process of overcoming linguistic differences during translation. The Estonian MAAS showed a single-factor structure and strong internal consistency. A cross-cultural comparison showed factorial invariance between the Estonian and the original scale. In an Estonian adult student sample, MAAS scores were invariant across genders and education levels, positively related to subjective well-being and self-esteem and inversely related to public self-consciousness and social anxiety. Item response theory analyses (IRT) revealed seven items of the Estonian version carrying most of the information load. We discuss how translating the MAAS into a unique linguistic context could inform an understanding of mindfulness itself.

Keywords

Mindfulness Mindful Attention Awareness Scale Estonian MAAS Psychometrics Item response theory 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank translators Kristiina Alas and Külli Nõmme. We also thank consultant professor Mare Pork and Estonian philologist Kristina Kask.

References

  1. Arbuckle, J. L. (2009). AMOS 18 [computer software]. Crawfordville: AMOS Development Corp.Google Scholar
  2. Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., & Allen, K. B. (2004). Assessment of mindfulness by self-report: the Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills. Assessment, 11(3), 191–206.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Black, D. S., Sussman, S., Johnson, C. A., & Milam, J. (2012). Psychometric assessment of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) among Chinese adolescents. Assessment, 19(1), 42–52.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 822–848.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, K. W., Ryan, R. M., & Creswell, J. D. (2007). Mindfulness: theoretical foundations and evidence for its salutary effects. Psychological Inquiry, 18, 211–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  7. Catak, P. D. (2012). The Turkish version of Mindful Attention Awareness Scale: preliminary findings. Mindfulness, 3, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cebolla, A., Luciano, J., DeMarzo, M., Navarro-Gil, M., & Campayo, J. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) in patients with fibromyalgia. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11(6), 1–7.Google Scholar
  9. Chen, K. (2013). The effect of language on economic behavior: evidence from savings rates, health behaviors, and retirement assets. American Economic Review, 103(2), 690–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deng, Y. Q., Li, S., Tang, Y. Y., Zhu, L. H., Ryan, R., & Brown, K. (2012). Psychometric properties of the Chinese translation of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS). Mindfulness, 3(1), 10–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Erelt, T., Leemets, T., Mäearu, S., & Raadik, M. (2006). Eesti õigekeelsus sõnaraamat. Tallinn: Eesti Keele Sihtasutus.Google Scholar
  12. Ellis, B. B., & Mead, A. D. (2002). Item analysis: Theory and practice using classical and modern test theory. In S. G. Rogelberg (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 324–344). Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  13. Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  14. Fenigstein, A., Scheier, M. F., & Buss, A. H. (1975). Public and private self-consciousness: assessment and theory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 522–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hambleton, R. K., Sawinathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory: Measurement methods for the social science. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Hambleton, R. K. (2004). Issues, design, and technical guidelines for adapting tests into multiple languages. In R. K. Hambleton, P. F. Merenda, & D. Spielperger (Eds.), Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment (pp. 3–38). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  17. Hansen, E., Lundh, L. G., Hommans, A., & Wångby-Lundh, M. (2009). Measuring mindfulness: pilot studies with the Swedish versions of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale and the Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills. Cognitive Behavior Therapy, 38, 2–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jermann, F., Laroi, F., Bondolfi, G., Billieux, J., d’Argembeau, A., Zermatten, A., et al. (2009). Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS): psychometric properties of the French translation and exploration of its relation with emotional regulation strategies. Psychological Assessment, 21(4), 506–514.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003). Mindfulness-based interventions in context: past, present, and future. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 144–156.Google Scholar
  21. Kay, P., & Kempton, W. (1984). What is the Sapir‐Whorf hypothesis? American Anthropologist, 86(1), 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lucy, J. A. (1997). Linguistic relativity. Annual Review of Anthropology, 26, 291–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mantzios, M., Wilson, J.C., & Giannou, K. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Greek versions of the Self-Compassion and Mindful Attention Awareness Scales. Mindfulness. doi: 10.1007/s12671-013-0237-3.
  24. Michalak, J., Heidenreich, T., Ströhle, G., & Nachtigall, C. (2008). Die deutsche version der Mindful Attention and Awareness Scale (MAAS). Psychometrische Befunde zu einem Achtsamkeitsfragebogen. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 37(3), 200–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pullmann, H., & Allik, J. (2000). The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: its dimensionality, stability, and personality correlates in Estonian. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 701–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Quaglia, J. T., Brown, K. W., Lindsay, E. K., Creswell, J. D., & Goodman, R. J. (2014). From conceptualization to operationalization of mindfulness. In K. W. Brown, J. D. Creswell, & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of mindfulness: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  27. R Development Core Team. (2010). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved March 01, 2011, from http://www.R-project.org.Google Scholar
  28. Realo, A., & Allik, J. (1998). The Estonian Self-Consciousness Scale and its relation to the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 70(1), 109–124.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rizopoulos, D. (2006). ltm: an R package for latent variable modelling and item response theory analyses. Journal of Statistical Software, 17, 1–25. Retrieved from http://www.jstatsoft.org/v17/i05/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Seema, R., & Sircova, A. (2013). Mindfulness—a time perspective? Estonian study. Baltic Journal of Psychology, 14, 1–2.Google Scholar
  32. Sisask, M., Värnik, A., Kõlves, K., Konstabel, K., & Wasserman, D. (2008). Subjective psychological well-being (WHO-5) in assessment of the severity of suicide attempt. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 62, 431–435.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Soler, J., Tejedor, R., Feliu-Soler, A., Pascual, J. C., Cebolla, A., Soriano, J., et al. (2012). Psychometric proprieties of Spanish version of Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS). Actas Españolas de Psiquiatría, 40(1), 19.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Van Dam, N. T., Earleywine, M., & Borders, A. (2010). Measuring mindfulness? An item response theory analysis of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(7), 805–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Riin Seema
    • 1
  • Jordan T. Quaglia
    • 2
  • Kirk Warren Brown
    • 2
  • Anna Sircova
    • 3
  • Kenn Konstabel
    • 4
  • Arno Baltin
    • 1
  1. 1.Tallinn UniversityTallinnEstonia
  2. 2.Virginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondUSA
  3. 3.Umea UniversityUmeaSweden
  4. 4.National Institute for Health DevelopmentTallinnEstonia

Personalised recommendations