Skip to main content
Log in

Dispositional Mindfulness and Bias in Self-theories

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Mindfulness Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mindfulness is theorized to encourage a dispositional quality of nonjudgmental awareness that is incongruent with emotional and cognitive bias. Recent empirical investigations offer evidence supporting the putative negative association between dispositional mindfulness and bias. The present study aimed to test the hypothesized negative relationship between dispositional mindfulness and extreme or biased self-theories with respect to implicit beliefs about the variability of personality and intelligence. One hundred sixty-three young adults completed a measure of dispositional mindfulness followed by a self-theories implicit association test. Results indicate that respondents with less biased self-theories reported higher levels of dispositional mindfulness relative to respondents with more biased beliefs about the variability of intelligence and personality. These findings suggest that mindful individuals may adopt less biased characterizations of the self and maintain self-concepts that are less influenced by past associations or preconceived notions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aristotle, & Woods, M. (2005). Eudemian ethics (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association (text revision).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Lykins, E., Button, D., Krietemeyer, J., Sauer, S., et al. (2008). Construct validity of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in meditating and nonmeditating samples. Assessment, 15(3), 329–342.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barrash, J., Asp, E., Markon, K., Manzel, K., Anderson, S. W., & Tranel, D. (2011). Dimensions of personality disturbance after focal brain damage: investigation with the Iowa Scales of Personality Change. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 33(8), 833–852.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brinch, C. N., & Galloway, T. A. (2012). Schooling in adolescence raises IQ scores. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(2), 425–430.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. W., Ryan, R. M., & Creswell, J. D. (2007). Mindfulness: theoretical foundations and evidence for its salutary effects. Psychological Inquiry, 18(4), 211–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmody, J., & Baer, R. A. (2008). Relationships between mindfulness practice and levels of mindfulness, medical and psychological symptoms and well-being in a mindfulness-based stress reduction program. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 31, 23–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cleary, T. (1991). An initiation into the heart of Taoism through the authentic Tao Te Ching and the inner teachings of Chuang-tzu. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djikic, M., Langer, E. J., & Stepleton, S. F. (2008). Reducing stereotyping through mindfulness: effects on automatic stereotype-activated behaviors. Journal of Adult Development, 15, 106–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: their role in motivation, personality, and development. Lillington, NC: Edwards Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: the new psychology of success. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, J. L. (1995). The fundamental wisdom of the middle way: Nagarjuna’s Mulamadhyamakakarika. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland, E. L. (2007). The meaning of mindfulness: a second-order cybernetics of stress, metacognition, and coping. Complementary Health Practice Review, 12(1), 15–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland, E. L., & Howard, M. O. (2013). Mindfulness-oriented recovery enhancement reduces pain attentional bias in chronic pain patients. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 82, 311–318.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garland, E.L., Boettiger, C.A., Gaylord, S., Chanon, V.W., & Howard, M.O. (2011). Mindfulness is inversely associated with alcohol attentional bias among recovering alcohol-dependent adults. Cognitive Therapy and Research. doi: 10.1007/s10608-011-9378-7

  • Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E. L., & Banaji, M. R. (2009). Understanding and using the implicit association test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 17–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gunarantana, H. (1992). Mindfulness in plain English. Boston: Wisdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haimovitz, K., Wormington, S. V., & Corpus, J. H. (2011). Dangerous mindsets: how beliefs about intelligence predict motivational change. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(6), 747–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanh, T. N. (1998). The heart of the Buddha’s teaching: transforming suffering into peace, joy, and liberation. Berkeley, CA: Parallax.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzel, B. K., Lazar, S. W., Gard, T., Schuman-Olivier, Z., Vago, D., & Ott, U. (2011). How does mindfulness meditation work? Proposing mechanisms of action from a conceptual and neural perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(6), 537–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, C. J., Donnellan, M. B., Blonigen, D. M., Krueger, R. F., McGue, M., Iacono, W. G., et al. (2011). Genetic and environmental influences on personality trait stability and growth during the transition to adulthood: a three-wave longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 545–556.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990). Full catastrophe living: using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain and illness. New York: Delacorte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiken, L. G., & Shook, N. J. (2011). Looking up: mindfulness increases positive judgments and reduces negativity bias. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 425–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maier, S. F., & Seligman, M. E. P. (1976). Learned helplessness: theory and evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 105, 3–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane, T. J. (1995). The meaning of sunyata in Nagarjuna’s philosophy. Available from http://www.integralscience.org/sacredscience/SSsunyata.html. Accessed 5 May 2013

  • Merton, T. (1955). No man is an island. New York: Harcourt, Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nosek, B. A., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2005). Understanding and using the implicit association test: II. Method variables and construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 166–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., MacCallum, R. C., & Nicewander, W. A. (2005). Use of the extreme groups approach: a critical reexamination and new recommendations. Psychological Methods, 10, 178–192.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: a meta- analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, S. (1970). Zen mind. Weatherhill, NY: Beginner Mind’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tse, L (2008). Tao Te Ching: of the Tao and its characteristics (James Legge, Trans.). The Floating Press, Auckland

  • Vago, D. R., & Silbersweig, D. A. (2012). Self-awareness, self-regulation, and self-transcendence (S-ART): a framework for understanding the neurobiological mechanisms of mindfulness. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6(296), 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam Hanley.

Appendix

Appendix

In each of the following tests, you will be asked to put words into categories, using the keys on your keyboard. Put your middle or index fingers on the Q and P keys on your keyboard. Words representing the categories at the top will appear one-by-one in the middle of the screen. When the item belongs to a category on the left, press the Q key; when the item belongs to a category on the right, press the P key. Items belong to only one category.

The Q key indicates the category on the LEFT.

The P key indicates the category on the RIGHT.

Please complete this survey as quickly as possible. It is alright to make a few mistakes, but taking the survey too slow will lead to uninterpretable results. If you make a mistake, the item will not change until you correct the mistake by hitting the correct key.

The following is a list of category labels and the items that belong to each of those categories.

Category

Items

Personality

Demeanor, disposition, identity, nature, temperament

Intelligence

Ability, aptitude, cleverness, intellect, IQ

Variable

Changeable, dynamic, fluctuating, irregular, malleable

Stable

Constant, fixed, permanent, steady, unchanging

Keep in mind

* Keep your index fingers on the “q” and “p” keys to enable rapid response.

* Two labels at the top will tell you which words or images go with each key.

* Each word or image has a correct classification. Most of these are easy.

* The test gives no results if you go slow—Please try to go as fast as possible.

* Expect to make a few mistakes because of going fast. That’s OK.

* For best results, avoid distractions and stay focused.

Press any key to continue

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hanley, A., Garland, E., Canto, A. et al. Dispositional Mindfulness and Bias in Self-theories. Mindfulness 6, 202–207 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-013-0245-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-013-0245-3

Keywords

Navigation