Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Formulation and Optimization of Ansamycin-Loaded Polymeric Nanoparticles Using Response Surface Methodology for Bacterial Meningitis

  • Published:
BioNanoScience Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Response surface methodology utilizing the central composite rotatable design version was made use of to optimize formulation of ansamycin-loaded polymeric nanoparticles. The central composite rotatable design including three-factored factorial designs with 3 levels was utilized in this research study. The drug encapsulation efficiency, particle size and zeta potential of the nanoparticles were examined relative to 3 independent variables consisting of polymer concentration (X1), surfactant concentration (X2) and also proportion of organic to aqueous phase volume (X3). The outcome revealed that the ideal formula can be gotten from this response surface methodology. The ideal solution for the nanoparticles was made up of polymer concentration (X1) of 5% w/v, surfactant concentration (X2) of 1% w/v and also proportion of aqueous to organic phase volume (X3) of 10:1 v/v. Ansamycin nanoparticles under the optimized conditions generated the encapsulation efficiency of 89%, mean particle size of 121 nm and zeta potential value of − 25 mV. SEM of the optimized polymeric nanoparticle showed spherical particles. The in vitro experiments verified that ansamycin in the polymeric nanoparticles released progressively over the duration of 36 h. This research study revealed that the response surface methodology central composite rotatable design can successfully be gotten the modelling of ansamycin polymeric nanoparticles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Keerthi Nair, G. S., Ramaiyan, V., & Sathesh Kumar, S. (2018). Enhancement of drug permeability across blood brain barrier using nanoparticles in meningitis. Inflamopharmacology, 26, 675–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ak, G., Viswanadhan, V. N., & Wendoloski, J. J. (1999). Acknowledge based approach in designing combinatorial or medicinal chemistry libraries for drug discovery. A qualitative and quantitative. Journal of Combinatorial Chemistry, 1, 55–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lipinski, C. A. (2000). Drug-like properties and the causes of poor solubility and poor permeability. Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods, 44, 235–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Paul, D. R., & Robeson, L. M. (2008). Polymer nanotechnology: nanocomposites. Polymer, 49, 3187–3204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Njuguna, J., & Pielichowski, K. (2003). Polymer nanocomposites for aerospace applications: properties. Advanced Engineering Materials, 5, 769–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hule, R. A., & Pochan, D. J. (2007). Polymer nanocomposites for biomedical applications. MRS Bulletin, 32, 354–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Crosby, A. J., & Lee, J. Y. (2007). Polymer nanocomposites: the nano effect on mechanical properties. Polymer Reviews, 47, 217–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. De Volder, M. F. L., Tawfick, S. H., Baughman, R. H., & Hart, A. J. (2013). Carbon nanotubes: present and future commercial applications. Science, 339, 535–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rhim, J. W., Park, H. M., & Ha, C. S. (2013). Bio-nanocomposites for food packaging applications. Progress in Polymer Science, 38, 1629–1652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mittal, V. (2013). Polymer nanocomposite coatings. CRC Press.

  11. Moore, J., & Flanner, H. (1991). Mathematical comparison of dissolution profiles. Pharmaceutical Technology, 2064–2074.

  12. Qi, X., Tan, C., Wei, J., & Zhang, H. (2013). Synthesis of graphene-conjugated polymer nanocomposites for electronic device applications. Nanoscale, 5, 1440–1451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang, X., & Jiang, P. (2005). Core-shell structured high-k polymer nanocomposites for energy storage and dielectric applications. Advanced Materials, 27, 546–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Crowley, C., Birchall, M., & Seifalian, A. M. (2005). Trachea transplantation: from laboratory to patient. Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, 9, 357–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang, Y. B., Tsai, Y. H., & Yang, W. C. (2004). Once-daily propranolol extended-release tablet dosage form: formulation design and in vitro/in vivo investigation. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 58, 607–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ribeiro, S., Hussain, N., & Florence, A. T. (2005). Release of DNA from dendriplexes encapsulated in PLGA nanoparticles. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 298, 354–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ahn, J. H., Kim, Y. P., & Lee, Y. M. (2008). Optimization of microencapsulation of seed oil by response surface methodology. Food Chemistry, 107, 98–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Myers, R. H., & Montgomery, D. C. (2002). Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments. New York: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Zweers, M. L., Grijpma, D. W., & Engbers, G. H. (2003). The preparation of monodisperse biodegradable polyester nanoparticles with a controlled size. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part B, Applied Biomaterials, 66, 559–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Murakami, H., Kawashima, Y., & Niwa, T. (1997). Influence of the degrees of hydrolyzation and polymerization of poly(vinylalcohol) on the preparation and properties of poly(dl-lactide-co-glycolide) nanoparticle. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 149, 43–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gorner, T., Gref, R., & Michenot, D. (1999). Lidocaine-loaded biodegradable nanospheres. Optimization of the drug incorporation into the polymer matrix. Journal of Controlled Release, 57, 259–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Budhian, A., Siegel, S. J., & Winey, K. L. (2005). Production of haloperidol-loaded PLGA nanoparticles for extended controlled drug release of haloperidol. Journal of Microencapsulation, 22, 773–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Krishnamachari, Y., Madan, P., & Lin, S. (2007). Development of pH- and time-dependent oral microparticles to optimize budesonide delivery to ileum and colon. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 338, 238–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wong, H. L., Bendayan, R., & Rauth, A. M. (2007). Chemotherapy with anticancer drugs encapsulated in solid lipid nanoparticles. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 59, 491–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jain, V., Jain, S., & Mahajan, S. C. (2015). Nanomedicines based drug delivery systems for anti-cancer targeting and treatment. Current Drug Delivery, 12, 177–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors express their gratitude to the School of Pharmaceutical sciences, Vels Institute of Science Technology and Advanced Studies, Chennai, India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vels Institute of Science Technology and Advanced Studies, Chennai, 600117, India

    Keerthi G. S. Nair, Ramaiyan Velmurugan & Sathesh Kumar Sukumaran

Authors
  1. Keerthi G. S. Nair
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ramaiyan Velmurugan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sathesh Kumar Sukumaran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

KGS formulated, optimized and characterized the nanoforumulations and also writing the manuscript. RV was again a major contributor in reviewing the manuscript. SS approved the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sathesh Kumar Sukumaran.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Research Involving Human Participants or Animals

None.

Informed Consent

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nair, K.G.S., Velmurugan, R. & Sukumaran, S.K. Formulation and Optimization of Ansamycin-Loaded Polymeric Nanoparticles Using Response Surface Methodology for Bacterial Meningitis. BioNanoSci. 10, 279–291 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12668-019-00713-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12668-019-00713-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation