Single-Molecule Interactions of a Monoclonal Anti-DNA Antibody with DNA
- 180 Downloads
Interactions of DNA with proteins are essential for key biological processes and have both a fundamental and practical significance. In particular, DNA binding to anti-DNA antibodies is a pathogenic mechanism in autoimmune pathology, such as systemic lupus erythematosus. Here we measured at the single-molecule level binding and forced unbinding of surface-attached DNA and a monoclonal anti-DNA antibody MRL4 from a lupus erythematosus mouse. In optical trap-based force spectroscopy, a microscopic antibody-coated latex bead is trapped by a focused laser beam and repeatedly brought into contact with a DNA-coated surface. After careful discrimination of non-specific interactions, we showed that the DNA-antibody rupture force spectra had two regimes, reflecting formation of weaker (20–40 pN) and stronger (>40 pN) immune complexes that implies the existence of at least two bound states with different mechanical stability. The two-dimensional force-free off-rate for the DNA-antibody complexes was ∼2.2 × 10−3 s−1, the transition state distance was ∼0.94 nm, the apparent on-rate was ∼5.26 s−1, and the stiffness of the DNA-antibody complex was characterized by a spring constant of 0.0021 pN/nm, suggesting that the DNA-antibody complex is a relatively stable, but soft and deformable macromolecular structure. The stretching elasticity of the DNA molecules was characteristic of single-stranded DNA, suggesting preferential binding of the MRL4 antibody to one strand of DNA. Collectively, the results provide fundamental characteristics of formation and forced dissociation of DNA-antibody complexes that help to understand principles of DNA-protein interactions and shed light on the molecular basis of autoimmune diseases accompanied by formation of anti-DNA antibodies.
KeywordsDNA Anti-DNA antibody Single-molecule force spectroscopy Optical trap Two-dimensional kinetics Nanomechanics
This work was supported by NIH grants U01-HL116330, R56 HL090774 and PO1-HL110860, NSF grant DMR 1505662, and the Program for Competitive Growth at Kazan Federal University.
The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.Pisetsky, D. S. (1998). Antibody responses to DNA in normal immunity and aberrant immunity. Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, 5, 1–6.Google Scholar
- 6.Williamson, R. A., Burgoon, M. P., Owens, G. P., Ghausi, O., Leclerc, E., Firme, L., et al. (2001). Anti-DNA antibodies are a major component of the intrathecal B cell response in multiple sclerosis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98, 1793–1798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Compagno, M., Rekvig, O. P., Bengtsson, A. A., Sturfelt, G., Heegaard, N. H., Jönsen, A., et al. (2014). Clinical phenotype associations with various types of anti-dsDNA antibodies in patients with recent onset of rheumatic symptoms. Results from a multicentre observational study. Lupus Science and Medicine, 1, e000007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Aranow C, Zhou D, Diamond B (2011) Anti-DNA antibodies: structure, regulation and pathogenicity. In: Lahita RG, Tsokos G, Buyon JP, Koike T (eds.) Systemic lupus erythematosus, Fifth Ed. Academic Press, pp 235–258.Google Scholar
- 30.Lionnet, T., Allemand, J. F., Revyakin, A., Strick, T. R., Saleh, O. A., Bensimon, D., et al. (2012). Single-molecule studies using magnetic traps. Cold Spring Harbor Protocols, 2012, 34–49.Google Scholar
- 32.Kofler, R., Strohal, R., Balderas, R. S., Johnson, M. E., Noonan, D. J., Duchosal, M. A., et al. (1988). Immunoglobulin kappa light chain variable region gene complex organization and immunoglobulin genes encoding anti-DNA autoantibodies in lupus mice. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 82, 852–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Litvinov, R. I., Yarovoi, S. V., Rauova, L., Barsegov, V., Sachais, B. S., Rux, A. H., et al. (2013). Distinct specificity and single-molecule kinetics characterize the interaction of pathogenic and non-pathogenic antibodies against platelet factor 4-heparin complexes with platelet factor 4. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 288, 33060–33070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.Nelson P (2004) Biological physics. In: Freeman WH and company, New York.Google Scholar
- 45.Kozyr, A. V., Kolesnikov, A. V., Khlyntseva, A. E., Bogun, A. G., Savchenko, G. A., Shemyakin, I. G., et al. (2012). Role of structure-based changes due to somatic mutation in highly homologous DNA-binding and DNA-hydrolyzing autoantibodies exemplified by A23P substitution in the VH domain. Autoimmune Diseases, 2012, 683829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 58.Schwesinger, F., Ros, R., Strunz, T., Anselmetti, D., Güntherodt, H. J., Honegger, A., et al. (2000). Unbinding forces of single antibody-antigen complexes correlate with their thermal dissociation rates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97, 9972–9977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar