Skip to main content
Log in

Formal modeling of industrial wireless applications

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Energy Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The exponential increase in the number of wires needed for the deployment of industrial applications in production lines combined with the complexity of the application development using proprietary protocols, shifted manufacturers towards new directions. One such direction that is also reducing the system configuration and maintenance cost is the use of wireless connectivity. Nevertheless, industrial wireless applications face significant challenges, as communication channel interference, loss of bandwidth and the out-of-order delivery or loss of packets. Therefore, they can not meet their critical operational and non-operational requirements. To this end, several tools have been proposed for modeling and simulation of these applications, in order to solve their challenges before their actual deployment and execution in the system architecture. However, these tools do not provide the ability to validate their functional and non-functional requirements nor provide guarantees for resolving their challenges. This article presents a new methodology that is using formal methods to model industrial wireless applications and architectures, but also to validate the deployment feasibility for industrial applications on wireless architectures. The method is based on formal methods and is using the BIP (behavior, interaction, priority) framework and stochastic components which represent the application and the wireless architecture at different levels. The methodology is applied in an industrial control system, that is responsible for electricity production from hydro sources. The experiments illustrate the realistic behavior of the developed models in comparison to the real system as well as allow to validate the feasibility of wireless architectural deployment for industrial applications through pragmatic quantitative and qualitative requirements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current work are available upon request.

Notes

  1. https://www.industrialshields.com/.

  2. https://profinetuniversity.com/profinet-features/wireless-profinet-overview/.

References

  1. Basu, A., Bensalem, B., Bozga, M., et al.: Rigorous component-based system design using the bip framework. IEEE Softw. 28(3), 41–48 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Basu, A., Bensalem, S., Bozga, M., et al.: Statistical abstraction and model-checking of large heterogeneous systems. Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf. 14(1), 53–72 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bennett, B., Boddy, M., Doyle, F., et al.: Assessment study on sensors and automation in the industries of the future. reports on industrial controls, information processing, automation, and robotics. Tech. rep., Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Washington, DC (2004)

  4. Cao Q., Abdelzaher, T., Stankovic, J., et al.: Declarative tracepoints: a programmable and application independent debugging system for wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems, pp. 85–98 (2008)

  5. Flammini, A., Ferrari, P., Marioli, D., et al.: Wired and wireless sensor networks for industrial applications. Microelectron. J. 40(9), 1322–1336 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gungor, V.C., Hancke, G.P.: Industrial wireless sensor networks: challenges, design principles, and technical approaches. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 56(10), 4258–4265 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hérault, T., Lassaigne, R., Magniette, F., et al.: Approximate probabilistic model checking. In: Verification, Model Checking, and Abstract Interpretation. Springer, pp. 73–84 (2004)

  8. Höfner, P., McIver, A.: Statistical model checking of wireless mesh routing protocols. In: NASA Formal Methods Symposium. Springer, pp. 322–336 (2013)

  9. IEEE.: Part 11: wireless lan medium access control (mac) and physical layer (phy) specification, IEEE 802.11. Tech. rep (2012)

  10. Kwiatkowska, M., Norman, G., Sproston, J.: Probabilistic model checking of the IEEE 802.11 wireless local area network protocol. In: Joint International Workshop von Process Algebra and Probabilistic Methods, Performance Modeling and Verification. Springer, pp. 169–187 (2002)

  11. Lekidis, A., Katsaros, P.: Energy characterization of iot systems through design aspect monitoring. Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf. (2021)

  12. Lekidis, A., Bourgos, P., Djoko-Djoko, S., et al.: Building distributed sensor network applications using bip. In: 2015 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS). IEEE, pp. 1–6 (2015a)

  13. Lekidis, A., Stachtiari, E., Katsaros, P., et al.: Using bip to reinforce correctness of resource-constrained iot applications. In: 10th IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Embedded Systems (SIES). IEEE, pp. 1–10 (2015b)

  14. Lekidis, A., Stachtiari, E., Katsaros, P., et al.: Model-based design of iot systems with the bip component framework. Softw. Pract. Exp. 48(6), 1167–1194 (2018)

  15. Nouri, A., Bensalem, S., Bozga, M., et al.: Statistical model checking qos properties of systems with sbip. Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf. 17(2), 171–185 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Salvadori, F., de Campos, M., Sausen, P.S., et al.: Monitoring in industrial systems using wireless sensor network with dynamic power management. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 58(9), 3104–3111 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tramarin, F., Vitturi, S., Luvisotto, M., et al.: On the use of IEEE 802.11 n for industrial communications. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 12(5), 1877–1886 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Witsch, D., Vogel-Heuser, B., Faure, J.M., et al.: Performance analysis of industrial ethernet networks by means of timed model-checking. IFAC Proc. Vol. 39(3), 101–106 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexios Lekidis.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lekidis, A., Anastasiadis, A.G. & Hrissagis, K. Formal modeling of industrial wireless applications. Energy Syst (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12667-023-00599-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12667-023-00599-8

Keywords

Navigation