Skip to main content
Log in

Toward scalable stochastic unit commitment. Part 1: load scenario generation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Energy Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Unit commitment decisions made in the day-ahead market and during subsequent reliability assessments are critically based on forecasts of load. Traditional, deterministic unit commitment is based on point or expectation-based load forecasts. In contrast, stochastic unit commitment relies on multiple load scenarios, with associated probabilities, that in aggregate capture the range of likely load time-series. The shift from point-based to scenario-based forecasting necessitates a shift in forecasting technologies, to provide accurate inputs to stochastic unit commitment. In this paper, we discuss a novel scenario generation methodology for load forecasting in stochastic unit commitment, with application to real data associated with the Independent System Operator of New England (ISO-NE). The accuracy of the expected load scenario generated using our methodology is consistent with that of point forecasting methods. The resulting sets of realistic scenarios serve as input to rigorously test the scalability of stochastic unit commitment solvers, as described in the companion paper. The scenarios generated by our method are available as an online supplement to this paper, as part of a novel, publicly available large-scale stochastic unit commitment benchmark.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Black, J.: Load hindcasting: a retrospective regional load prediction method using reanalysis weather data. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Massachusetts Amherst (2011)

  2. Bouffard, F., Galiana, F.D., Conejo, A.J.: Market-clearing with stochastic security—Part 1: formulation. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 20(4), 1818–1826 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Carpentier, P., Gohen, G., Culioli, J.C., Renaud, A.: stochastic optimization of unit commitment: a new decomposition framework. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 11, 1067–1073 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cheung, K., Gade, D., Monroy, C.S., Ryan, S.M., Watson, J.P., Wets, R.J.B., Woodruff, D.L.: Scalable stochastic unit commitment, part 2: solver performance. Energy Syst (to appear)

  5. Dupaçová, J., Gröwe-Kuska, N., Römisch, W.: Scenario reduction in stochastic programming. Math. Program. 95(3), 493–511 (2003). doi:10.1007/s10107-002-0331-0

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Feinberg, E.A., Genethliou, D.: Load forecasting. In: Chow, J.H., Wu, F.F., Momoh, J. (eds.) Applied Mathematics for Restructured Electric Power Systems, pp. 269–285. Springer (2005)

  7. Feng, Y., Gade, D., Ryan, S.M., Watson, J.P., Wets, R.J.B., Woodruff, D.L.: A new approximation method for generating day-ahead load scenarios. In: Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting (2013)

  8. Gould, S.: Create demand forecast. Tech. Rep. SOP-OUTSCH.0040.0010, ISO New England, Inc (2011)

  9. Hong, T.: Electric load forecasting with holiday effect. https://sites.google.com/site/hongtao01/courses/holiday (2012). Presented at AEIC Load Research Workshop 2012, Orlando, FL

  10. Hong, T., Gui, M., Baran, M., Willis, H.: Modeling and forecasting hourly electric load by multiple linear regression with interactions. In: Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE Power and Energy Society Meeting (2010)

  11. Hong, T., Pinson, P., Fan, S.: Global energy forecasting competition 2012. Int. J. Forecast. (2013). doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2013.07.001

  12. Huang, Y., Zheng, Q.P., Wang, J.: Two-stage stochastic unit commitment model including non-generation resources with conditional value-at-risk constraints. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 116, 427–438 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Klboe, G., Eriksrud, A.L., Fleten, S.E.: Benchmarking time series based forecasting models for electricity balancing market prices. Energy Syst. (2013). doi:10.1007/s12667-013-0103-3

  14. Liu, J., Chen, R., Liu, L., Harris, J.: A semi-parametric time series approach in modeling hourly electricity loads. J. Forecast. 25, 537–559 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Morales, J.M., Conejo, A.J., Liu, K., Zhong, J.: Pricing electricity in pools with wind producers. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 27(3), 1366–1376 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Papavasiliou, A., Oren, S.: A stochastic unit commitment model for integrating renewable supply and demand response. In: Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society Meeting (2012)

  17. Rios, I., Wets, R.J.B., Woodruff, D.L.: Multi-period forecasting and scenario generation with limited data. Comput. Manag. Sci. (to appear)

  18. Royset, J., Wets, R.: Epi-splines and exponential epi-splines: pliable approximation tools. Tech. rep., University of California Davis (2012)

  19. Royset, J., Wets, R.: Fusion of hard and soft information in non-parametric density estimation. Tech. rep., University of California Davis (2012)

  20. Ruiz, P., Philbrick, C., Sauer, P.: Modeling approaches for computational cost reduction in stochastic unit commitment formulations. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 25(1), 588–589 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ruiz, P., Philbrick, R., Zack, E., Cheung, K., Sauer, P.: Uncertainty management in the unit commitment problem. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 24(2), 642–651 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Salazar, J.M., Diwekar, U., Constantinescu, E., Zavala, V.M.: Stochastic optimization approach to water management in cooling-constrained power plants. Appl. Energy 112(0), 12–22 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.05.077

  23. Scharff, R., Egerer, J., Sder, L.: A description of the operative decision-making process of a power generating company on the nordic electricity market. Energy Syst. 5(2), 349–369 (2014). doi:10.1007/s12667-013-0104-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Siface, D., Vespucci, M.T., Gelmini, A.: Solution of the mixed integer large scale unit commitment problem by means of a continuous stochastic linear programming model. Energy Syst. 5, 269–284 (2014). doi:10.1007/s12667-013-0107-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Takriti, S., Birge, J., Long, E.: A stochastic model for the unit commitment problem. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 11(3), 1497–1508 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Takriti, S., Krasenbrink, B., Wu, L.S.Y.: Incorporating fuel constraints and electricity spot prices into the stochastic unit commitment problem. Oper. Res. 48(2), 268–280 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wets, R., Bianchi, S.: Term and volatility structures. In: Zenios, S., Ziemba, W. (eds.) Handbook of Asset and Liability Management, pp. 26–68. Elsevier (2006)

  28. Wu, L., Shahidehpour, M., Li, T.: Stochastic security-constrained unit commitment. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 22(2), 800–811 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zavala, V.M., Constantinescu, E.M., Krause, T., Anitescu, M.: On-line economic optimization of energy systems using weather forecast information. J. Process Control 19(10), 1725–1736 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.jprocont.2009.07.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under Contract DE-AC04-94-AL85000. This work was funded by the Department of Energy’s Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy, under the Green Energy Network Integration (GENI) project portfolio. The authors would like to thank Dr. Eugene Litvinov and his research group at ISO-NE (in particular, Bill Callan) for their assistance with ISO-NE system and data sources.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Paul Watson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feng, Y., Rios, I., Ryan, S.M. et al. Toward scalable stochastic unit commitment. Part 1: load scenario generation. Energy Syst 6, 309–329 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12667-015-0146-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12667-015-0146-8

Keywords

Navigation