Abstract
The estimation of commodity spot price models often involves the estimation of risk premiums. We show in a simulation study that the market prices of risk cannot be accurately estimated using two popular estimation techniques; the Kalman filter and an iterative routine. Risk premium parameters may be dependent on the starting value for the iterative routine, and cannot be accurately estimated using the Kalman filter technique. We conclude with a short analysis of results from the spot price model literature by examining the implied volatility term structure from other published research papers.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
\(\xi \) is initialized with an arbitrarily chosen value of 3. The initial value of the state variables do not influence the estimation of the model parameters.
While the price of financial assets usually are observed without measurement error, the model can be slightly misspecified, giving rise to an error term. Regardless of the economical interpretation of the error term, the variance of the innovation in this experiment is given such a low value that it does not affect the estimated model parameters. We set \(\sigma _f = 0.001\).
To better isolate the problems that occur in the estimation of the risk premium parameters the initial configuration of the model parameters is fixed at their true value.
References
Bhar, R., Lee, D.: Time-varying market price of risk in the crude oil futures market. J. Futures Mark. 31(8), 779–807 (2011)
Cartea, A., Williams, T.: UK gas markets: the market price of risk and applications to multiple interruptible supply contracts. Energy Econ. 30(3), 829–846 (2008)
Cortazar, G., Naranjo, L.: An N-factor Gaussian model of oil futures prices. J. Futures Mark. 26(3), 243–268 (2006)
Cortazar, G., Schwartz, E.S.: Implementing a stochastic model for oil futures prices. Energy Econ. 25(3), 215–238 (2003)
De Long, J.B., Shleifer, A., Summers, L.H., Waldmann, R.J.: Noise trader risk in financial markets. J. Political Econ. 98(4), 703–738 (1990)
Duffee, G.R., Stanton, R.H.: Estimation of dynamic term structure models. Q. J. Finance. 2(02), (2012). http://www.econ2.jhu.edu/people/Duffee/
Durbin, J., Koopman, S.J.: Time series analysis by state space methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001)
Helske, J.: KFAS: Kalman filter and smoothers for exponential family state space models. 2010. R package version 0.6.0.
Lee, C.M.C., Shleifer, A., Thaler, R.H.: Closed-end mutual funds. J. Econ. Perspect. 4(4), 153–164 (1990)
Lucia, J.J., Schwartz, E.S.: Electricity prices and power derivatives: evidence from the nordic power exchange. Rev. Deriv. Res. 5(1), 5–50 (2002)
Manoliu, M., Tompaidis, S.: Energy futures prices: term structure models with Kalman filter estimation. Appl. Math. Finance. 9(1), 21–43 (2002)
Nomikos, N.K., Soldatos, O.A.: Modelling short and long-term risks in power markets: empirical evidence from nord pool. Energy Policy. 38(10), 5671–5683 (2010)
Pindyck, R.S.: Volatility and commodity price dynamics. J. Futures Mark. 24(11), 1029–1047 (2004)
Samuelson, P.A.: Proof that properly anticipated prices fluctuate randomly. Ind. Manag. Rev. 6(2), 41–49 (1965)
Schwartz, E., Smith, J.E.: Short-term variations and long-term dynamics in commodity prices. Manag. Sci. 46(7), 893–911 (2000)
Schwartz, E.S.: The stochastic behavior of commodity prices: implications for valuation and hedging. J. Finance. 52(3), 923–974 (1997)
Wilkens, S., Wimschulte, J.: The pricing of electricity futures: evidence from the european energy exchange. J. Futures Mark. 27(4), 387–410 (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Andresen, A., Sollie, J.M. Multi-factor models and the risk premiums: a simulation study. Energy Syst 4, 301–314 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12667-013-0080-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12667-013-0080-6