Abstract
Ancillary Services (AS) in electric power industry are critical to support the transmission of energy from generators to load demands while maintaining reliable operation of transmission systems in accordance with good utility practice. The ancillary services are procured by the independent system operator (ISO) through a process called the market clearing process which can be modeled by the partial equilibrium from the ends of ISO. There are two capacity optimization problems for both Market participants (MP) and Independent System Operator (ISO). For a market participant, the firm needs to determine the capacity allocation plan for various AS to pursue operating revenue under various uncertainties which can never be accurately estimated. We thereby employ a heuristic named “resource reservation” to suggest two types of bids, the regular and the must-win for a market participant to pursue higher expected revenue and satisfactory performance in terms of revenue under the worst case scenario. Meanwhile, the ISO, needs to determine the total amount of capacity required to guarantee the overall reliability of the transmission system. Our numerical experiment is based on our industrial partner’ operational data and the simulation result suggests that our proposed methods would greatly outperform the deterministic methods in terms of the profitability for a market participant and the ISO’s entire system’s reliability.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baldick, R., Niu, H.: Lessons Learned: The Texas Experience. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2005)
Brien, L.: Why the ancillary services markets in California don’t work and what to do about it. Electr. J. 12(5), 38–49 (1999)
Chen, L.: Solving change constraint imposed on affine inequalities with logarithmically concave continuous random vector. Research report 11A07, University of Louisville. http://uncertaintylab.com/or1122.pdf (2011)
Hirst, E.: Maximizing generator profits across energy and ancillary-services markets. Electr. J. 13(5), 61–69 (2000)
Hirst, E., Kirby, B.: Electric-power ancillary services. ORNL/CON-426, Oak Ridge (1996)
Kirby, B., Hirst, E.: Ancillary Service Details: Voltage Control. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge (1997)
Nesterov, Y.: Introductory Lectures on Convex Optimization: A Basic Course. Kluwer Academic, Norwell (2004). ISBN 1402075537
Niu, H., Baldick, R., Zhu, G.: Supply function equilibrium bidding strategies with fixed forward contracts. IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst. 20(4), 1859–1867 (2005)
Prekopa, A.: On logarithmic concave measures and functions. Acta Sci. Math. 34, 335–343 (1973)
Prekopa, A.: New proof for the basic theorem of log concave measures. Alkalm. Mat. L. 1, 385–389 (1977)
Rachev, S.T., Römisch, W.: Quantitative stability in stochastic programming: the method of probability metrics. Math. Oper. Res. 27(4), 792–818 (2002). ISSN 0364-765X
Rashidinejad, M., Song, Y.H., Javidi Dasht-Bayaz, M.H.: Contingency reserve pricing via a joint energy and reserve dispatching approach. Energy Convers. Manag. 43(4), 537–548 (2002)
Ruszczynski, A., Shapiro, A. (eds.): Stochastic Programming. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, vol. 10. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2003)
Singh, H.: Auctions for ancillary services. Decis. Support Syst. 24(3–4), 183–191 (1999)
Wen, F., David, A.K.: Coordination of bidding strategies in day-ahead energy and spinning reserve markets. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 24(4), 251–261 (2002)
Wen, F.S., David, A.K.: Optimally co-ordinated bidding strategies in energy and ancillary service markets. In: IEE Proceedings Generation, Transmission and Distribution, vol. 149, pp. 331–338. IET, Stevenage (2002)
Wolak, F., Nordhaus, R., Shapiro, C.: Report on the redesign of the markets for ancillary services and real-time energy. Prepared by the Market Surveillance Committee of the California ISO, March (1999)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, L., Sun, D. & Li, G. Ancillary service capacity optimization for both electric power suppliers and independent system operator. Energy Syst 3, 109–132 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12667-012-0052-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12667-012-0052-2