Energy Systems

, Volume 1, Issue 4, pp 417–439

Compensating for wind variability using co-located natural gas generation and energy storage

Original Paper


Wind generation presents variability on every time scale, which must be accommodated by the electric grid. Limited quantities of wind power can be successfully integrated by the current generation and demand-side response mix but, as deployment of variable resources increases, the resulting variability becomes increasingly difficult and costly to mitigate. We model a co-located power generation/energy storage block which contains wind generation, a gas turbine, and fast-ramping energy storage. Conceptually, the system is designed with the goal of producing near-constant “baseload” power at a reasonable cost while still delivering a significant and environmentally meaningful fraction of that power from wind. The model is executed in 10 second time increments in order to correctly reflect the operational limitations of the natural gas turbine. A scenario analysis identifies system configurations that can generate power with 30% of energy from wind, a variability of less than 0.5% of the desired power level, and an average cost around $70/MWh. The systems described have the most utility for isolated grids, such as Hawaii or Ireland, but the study has implications for all electrical systems seeking to integrate wind energy and informs potential incentive policies.


Wind integration Energy storage Wind variability Sodium sulfur batteries Renewable portfolio standards 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Apt, J.: The spectrum of power from wind turbines. J. Power Sources 169(2), 369–374 (2007) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    GE Energy: Heavy Duty Gas Turbine Products. Retrieved 5 3, 2010, from GE Energy—F Class: (2009)
  3. 3.
    Kim, J., Song, T., Kim, T., Ro, S.: Dynamic simulation of full startup procedure of heavy-duty gas turbines. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 124(3), 510–516 (2002) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Castronuovo, E.D., Lopes, J.A.P.: On the optimization of the daily operation of a wind-hydro power plant. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 19(3), 1599–1606 (2004) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Greenblatt, Succar, Denkenberger, Williams, Socolow: Baseload wind energy: modeling the competition between gas turbines and compressed air energy storage for supplemental generation. Energy Policy 35, 1474–1492 (2007) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Katzenstein, W., Apt, J.: Air emissions due to wind and solar power. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43(2), 253–258 (2009) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ummels, Pelgrum, Kling: Integration of large-scale wind power and use of energy storage in the Netherlands’ electricity supply. IET Renew. Power Gener. 2(1), 34–46 (2007) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Black, Strbac: Value of bulk energy storage for managing wind power fluctuations. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 22(1), 197–205 (2007) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McDowall, J.: Integrating energy storage with wind power in weak electricity grids. J. Power Sources 162, 959–964 (2006) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wan, Y., Bucaneg, D.: Short-term power fluctuations of large wind power plants. In: 21st ASME Wind Energy Symposium, Reno, NV, 2002 Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    EPRI-DOE: Handbook of Energy Storage for Transmission or Distribution Applications. EPRI-DOE (2002) Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    NGK Insulators: Overview of NAS battery for load management. In: CEC Energy Storage Workshop (2005) Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wiser, R., Bolinger, M.: 2008 Wind Technologies Market Report. US DOE (2008) Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    DeCesaro, J., Porter, K., Milligan, M.: Wind energy and power system operations: a review of wind integration studies to date. Electr. J. 22(10), 34–43 (2009) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    EIA: Natural Gas Navigator. Retrieved 12 7, 2009, from US Energy Information Administration. (2009, 10 30)
  16. 16.
    ERCOT: ERCOT Protocols, Section 6: Ancillary Services. Retrieved Nov 27, 2009, from ERCOT—Current Protocols. (2009, Oct 28)
  17. 17.
    Morthorst: Wind power and the conditions at a liberalized power market. Wind Energy 6, 297–308 (2003) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Department of Communications: Marine and Natural Resources. (2004). Renew. Electr. (2010) Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kanter, J.: A Record for Wind in Ireland. Retrieved December 15, 2009, from Green, Inc. blog— (2009, August 11)
  20. 20.
    HECO: Power Facts. Retrieved December 17, 2009, from Hawaii Electric Company. (2009, July)
  21. 21.
    State of Hawaii: Energy Agreement Among the State of Hawaii, Division of Consumer Advocacy of the Department of Commerce & Consumer Affairs, and Hawaiian Electric Companies (2008) Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    DOE/NETL: Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants—Volume 1: Bituminous Coal and Natural Gas to Electricity (2007) Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lazard: Levelized Cost of Energy Analysis—Version 2.0. Presentation at NARUC (2008) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Engineering & Public PolicyCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA
  2. 2.Department of Materials Science & EngineeringCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA
  3. 3.Tepper School of BusinessCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations