Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparing the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Pure Copper Sheets Subjected to Different Types of Constrained Dies Pressing

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study conducts a comparative analysis of microstructures and properties in 99.9% pure copper sheets processed through constrained die pressing methods: groove, studded (CSP), and modified studded (Modified-CSP). The study involved analyzing the metallography of the microstructure, dislocation density using Debye–Scherrer analysis, residual stress using XRD-sin2ψ method, and strain distribution using DEFORM-3D software. The results show that all methods led to a decrease in grain size, improving the copper sheets’ ultimate tensile strength (UTS). CSP showed the most significant improvement in UTS. All techniques successfully reduced residual stress, with CSP using 45° studs being the most effective. However, the increased strain observed in Modified-CSP did not result in maximum UTS due to grain reduction limitations. In conclusion, CSP showed the most promising combination of refined microstructure and improved mechanical properties, making it the superior method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Valiev R Z, Islamgaliev R K, and Alexandrov I V, Prog Mater Sci 45 (2000) 103.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Khodabakhshi F, Kazeminezhad M, and Kokabi A H, Mater Sci Eng A 529 (2011) 237.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Khodabakhshi F, Kazeminezhad M, and Kokabi A H, Materials Characterization 69 (2012) 71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Khodabakhshi F, Kazeminezhad M, and Kokabi A H, Mater Sci Eng A 637 (2015) 12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Khelfa T, Rekik M A, Muñoz-Bolaños J A, Cabrera-Marrero J M, and Khitouni M, Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95 (2018) 1165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. El-Tahawy M, Gubicza J, Huang Y, Choi H L, Choe H M, Lábár J L, and Langdon T G, Mater Sci Forum 879 (2016) 502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. S.S.Hosseini Faregh and A. Hassani, International Journal of Material Forming 11 (2018) 175

  8. Khatami R, Fattah-alhosseini A, Mazaheri Y, Keshavarz M K, and Haghshenas M, Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93 (2017) 681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Khodabakhshi F, Abbaszadeh M, Mohebpour S R, and Eskandari H, In J Adv Manuf Technol 73 (2014) 1291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Torkestani and M.R. Dashtbayazi, A new method for severe plastic deformation of the copper sheets, Mater Sci Eng A 737 (2018) 236

  11. Kaykha M M, and Dashtbayazi M R, Metals 12 (2022) 193.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Torkestani A, and Dashtbayazi M R, Int J Mater Res 111 (2020) 594.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. S.S. Hosseini Faregh, R. Raiszadeh and M.R. Dashtbayazi, J Mater Eng Performance 2023

  14. Nazari F, Honarpisheh M, and Zhao H, Micron 132 (2020) 102843

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. C. E04, Test Methods for Determining Average Grain Size.

  16. Luo Q, and Jones A H, Surf Coat Technol 205 (2010) 1403.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. ASTM, ASTME8 / E8M-11, Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials, ASTM International West Conshohocken, PA: USA, (2016)

  18. Gordon R J, and William H C, Eng Fract Mech 21 (1985) 31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Čížek A, Orlová A, and Pařízek F, Czechoslov J Phys B 18 (1968) 1061.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kumar S S S, and Raghu T, Mater Des 88 (2015) 799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Krishnaiah A, Chakkingal U, and Venugopal P, Mater Sci Eng A 410–411 (2005) 337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. S.S. Satheesh Kumar and T. Raghu, Mechanical behaviour and microstructural evolution of constrained groove pressed nickel sheets, J. Mater. Process. Technol, 213 (2013) 214

  23. Khakbaz F, and Kazeminezhad M, Mater Sci Eng A 523 (2012) 26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mou X, Peng K, Zeng J, Shaw L L, and Qian K W, J Mater Process Technol 211 (2011) 590.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Meyers M A, Mishra A, and Benson D J, Prog Mater Sci 51 (2006) 427.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. V. Hauk, Structural and residual stress analysis by nondestructive methods: Evaluation-Application-Assessment, (1997). ISBN: 9780444824769.

  27. Sergo V, Pezzotti G, Sbaizero O, and Nishida T, Acta Mater 46 (1998) 1701.

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Węglewski, W. Basista, M, Manescu, A, Chmielewski, M, Pietrzak, K, and Schubert, T, Compos. Part B, 67 (2014) 119–124

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Metallurgy and Materials Science, School of Engineering, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Jomhoori Eslami Blvd., P.O.Box 76186, Kerman, Iran

    S. S. Hosseini Faregh & R. Raiszadeh

  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Jomhoori Eslami Blvd., P.O.Box 76186, Kerman, Iran

    M. R. Dashtbayazi

Authors
  1. S. S. Hosseini Faregh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Raiszadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. R. Dashtbayazi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. S. Hosseini Faregh.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Faregh, S.S.H., Raiszadeh, R. & Dashtbayazi, M.R. Comparing the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Pure Copper Sheets Subjected to Different Types of Constrained Dies Pressing. Trans Indian Inst Met 77, 727–735 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-023-03165-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-023-03165-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation