Skip to main content
Log in

Optimized Strength of Chopped Strand Mat Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polyester Laminates with Single-Edge Notch under the Effects of Notch Shape/Size and Strain Rate

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The chopped strand mat (CSM) glass fiber-reinforced polyester composite is commonly used for building and repairing in various industrial fields. Its sensitivity to the edge notches has not been considered well in the literature. This paper studies the notch tensile strength (NTS) and fracture characteristics of the proposed composite under the influence of each of the strain rate, notch shape and size with three levels. Nine tests have been designed according to the Taguchi’s orthogonal array. Then, analysis of variance (ANOVA) has been applied to analyze the experimental results of the NTS. Different models of SEN specimens were simulated to predict the stress distribution and concentration. Results reveal that the notch size, notch shape and strain rate have the effectiveness of 46.7, 40 and 6.4% on the failure stress, respectively. The smallest U-shape notch and lowest strain rate conditions achieve highest notch tensile stress. The numerical simulation results confirm the experimental results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Suresha B, Chandramohan G, and Renukappa N, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 103 (2007) 2472.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dadfar M, and Ghadami F, Mater. Des. 47 (2013) 16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sathishkumar T, Satheeshkumar S, and Naveen J, J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 33 (2014) 1258.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nayak S, Heckadka S, Sadanand R, Bharadwaj K, Pokharna H, and Sanjeev A, J. Eng. Fib. Fabr. 12 (2017) 155.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nayak S, Heckadka S, Thomas L, and Baby A, MATEC Web of Conferences 144 (2018) 2025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fung W 2002 Coated and laminated textiles (Woodhead Publishing)

  7. Andersson C, Dartman T, Gredinger P, Asplund J, and Strandqvist H, Mech. Compos. Mater. 34 (1998) 525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Arifin A, Abdullah S, Rafiquzzaman M, Zulkifli R, Wahab D, and Arifin A, Mater. Des. 59 (2014) 475.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaleemulla K, and Siddeswarappa B, Int. J. Mater. Prod. Technol. 31 (2008) 283.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hong C, and Ji W, Compos. Commun. 17 (2020) 28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang Z, Jiang J, and Chen N, J. Appl. Mech. Mater. 341 (2013) 49.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tarnowski K, Nikbin K, Dean D, and Davies C, Exp. Mech. 58 (2018) 1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Papanicolaou G, Mouzakis D, Kosmidou T, and Economopoulos G, Polym. Compos. 27 (2006) 177.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Suman S, Khan M, Pathak M, and Singh R, Procedia Eng. 173 (2017) 1185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Avci A, Arikan H, and Akdemir A, Cem. Concr. Compos. 34 (2004) 429.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mahmoud M, Polym.-Plast. Technol. Eng. 42 (2003) 659.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Woo S, and Choi N, Compos. Sci. Technol. 67 (2007) 1451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nguyen M, and Waas A, Compos. Struct. 279 (2021) 114731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Welsh L, and Harding J, J. Phys. Colloq. 46 (1985) 405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang S, Soden P, and Soden P, Compos. 17 (1986) 100.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lindhagen J, and Berglund L, Polym. Compos. 18 (1997) 40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Al-alkaw H, Al-Fattal D, and Baghdad B 2013 J. Eng. Sustain. Dev. 17

  23. Ichikawa D, Hamada H, and Ohtani A, Open. J. Compos. Mater. 8 (2018) 110.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. ASTM D1990 2019.

  25. ASTM D5083 2017.

  26. ASTM E1457-15 2015.

  27. ASTM E1820-15 2015.

  28. ASTM D3039-17 2017.

  29. Kovač P, Rodić D, Pucovski V, Mankova I, Savkovic B, and Gostimirović M, J. Prod. Eng. 15 (2012) 1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to acknowledge the Mechanical Engineering Department of Sulaimani Polytechnic University for their support. Special thanks to the Mechanical Department of Koya University for their Assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rzgar M. Abdalrahman.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdalrahman, R.M. Optimized Strength of Chopped Strand Mat Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polyester Laminates with Single-Edge Notch under the Effects of Notch Shape/Size and Strain Rate. Trans Indian Inst Met 76, 2857–2864 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-023-02979-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-023-02979-1

Keywords

Navigation