Abstract
Using molecular dynamics (MD) simulation, the pressure bonding of Cu54Zr46 metallic glass (MG) was performed under the introduction of an oxygen layer at the interface with different thicknesses. The results indicated that the evolution of the oxide layer in the joint zone was consistent with the inverse logarithmic law, which meant that the oxide growth occurred through an ionic drift process. It was also found that the high concentration of oxygen at the interface led to the deterioration of Cu-centered clusters, while the low content of oxygen intensified the backbone of the matrix in the vicinity of base metal. Moreover, the MD outcomes demonstrated that the diffusivity of elements increased with the rise of system temperature, leading to the widening of the joint zone. It was also revealed that an optimized oxygen layer tuned the strain distribution in the joint zone and increased the bonding strength. On the other hand, the thicker oxide layer led to the brittleness of the joint zone, so that a catastrophic failure with a sharp necking event occurred under the tensile loading. In total, this work shed light on the importance of oxide layer and system temperature on the joining performance of MGs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Zou Y M, Wu Y S, Li K F, Tan C L, Qiu Z G, and Zeng D C, Mater Lett 272 (2020) 127824.
Samavatian M, Gholamipour R, and Samavatian V, Comput Mater Sci 186 (2021) 110025. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.110025.
Luo X, Meng M, Li R, Li Z, Cole I S, Chen X -B, and Zhang T, Mater Des 196 (2020) 109109.
Jiao Y, Brousseau E, Ayre W N, Gait-Carr E, Shen X, Wang X, Bigot S, Zhu H, and He W, Appl Surf Sci 547 (2021) 149194.
Li H, Li Z, Yang J, Ke H B, Sun B, Yuan C C, Ma J, Shen J, and Wang W H, Sci China Mater 64 (2021) 964. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40843-020-1561-x.
Yu X, Huang J, Shao L, Zhang Y, Fan D, Kang Y, and Yang F, Mater Res Express 6 (2018) 26511.
Li J F, Sun Y H, Ding D W, Wang W H, and Bai H Y, J Non Cryst Solids 537 (2020) 120016. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2020.120016.
Liao C, Liu M, Zhang Q, Dong W, Zhao R, Li B, Jiao Z, Song J, Yao W, Zhao S, Bai H, and Wang W -H, Sci China Mater 64 (2021) 979. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40843-020-1533-x.
Feng J, Chen P, and Zhou Q, J Mater Eng Perform 27 (2018) 2932. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-018-3396-5.
Hanliang L, Ning L, Xiaojie L, Xin S, Tao S, and Zhanguo M, J Manuf Process 45 (2019) 115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.06.035.
Wang D, Li N, and Liu L, Intermetallics 93 (2018) 180. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intermet.2017.12.006.
Jamili-Shirvan Z, Haddad-Sabzevar M, Vahdati-Khaki J, and Yao K -F, J. Non Cryst Solids 544 (2020) 120188. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2020.120188.
Singh R, Gupta P, and Yedla N, Mol Simul 45 (2019) 1549. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08927022.2019.1661411.
Jiang M, Can Y, Xiaodi L, Baoshuang S, Quanfeng H, Fucheng L, Tianyu W, Dan W, Xiong L, Xiaoyu W, Yunjiang W, Feng G, Pengfei G, Weihua W, and Yong Y, Sci Adv 5 (2021) eaax7256. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax7256.
Zhang Y, Li J, Zhou H, Hu Y, Ding S, and Xia R, J. Mater Sci 56 (2021) 15906. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-021-06336-9.
Li X, Liang X, Zhang Z, Ma J, and Shen J, Scr Mater 185 (2020) 100. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.03.059.
Huang Z, Fu J, Li X, Wen W, Lin H, Lou Y, Luo F, Zhang Z, Liang X, and Ma J, Sci China Mater (2021). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40843-021-1723-6.
Zhou W H, Duan F H, Meng Y H, Zheng C C, Chen H M, Huang A G, Wang Y X, and Li Y, Acta Mater 220 (2021) 117345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2021.117345.
Pacheco V, Karlsson D, Marattukalam J J, Stolpe M, Hjörvarsson B, Jansson U, and Sahlberg M, J Alloys Compd 825 (2020) 153995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.153995.
Wang C, Shang S -L, You J, Bocklund B, Wang Y, Wang H -Y, and Liu Z -K, Metall Mater Trans A 52 (2021) 2501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-021-06242-4
Zhang M, Cai H, Zhang J, Li Q, Wang Y, Huang T, Liu J, and Wang X, Corros Sci 182 (2021) 109275. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2021.109275.
Cao D, Wu Y, Li H X, Liu X J, Wang H, Wang X Z, and Lu Z P, Intermetallics 99 (2018) 44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intermet.2018.05.007.
Kim Y -M, and Lee B -J, J Mater Res 23 (2008) 1095. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2008.0130.
Tuckerman M E, Alejandre J, López-Rendón R, Jochim A L, and Martyna G J, J Phys A Math Gen 39 (2006) 5629.
Liang T, Shan T -R, Cheng Y -T, Devine B D, Noordhoek M, Li Y, Lu Z, Phillpot S R, and Sinnott S B, Mater Sci Eng R Rep 74 (2013) 255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2013.07.001.
Stukowski A, Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 18 (2009) 15012.
Narula M L, Tare V B, and Worrell W L, Metall Trans B 14 (1983) 673. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02653953.
Domagala R F, and McPherson D J, JOM 6 (1954) 238. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03398005.
Yang J C, Kolasa B, Gibson J M, and Yeadon M, Appl Phys Lett 73 (1998) 2841.
Chen C -H, Yamaguchi T, Sugawara K, and Koga K, J Phys Chem B 109 (2005) 20669.
Xu Z, Rosso K M, and Bruemmer S, Phys Chem Chem Phys 14 (2012) 14534.
Cabrera N, and Mott N F, Rep Prog Phys 12 (1949) 163.
Garruchet S, Politano O, Arnoux P, and Vignal V, Solid State Commun 150 (2010) 439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssc.2009.12.012.
Nakamura R, Toda T, Tsukui S, Tane M, Ishimaru M, Suzuki T, and Nakajima H, J Appl Phys 116 (2014) 33504.
Bokov D O, Suksatan W, Widjaja G, Khoiri A, Mahmoud M Z, Al Mashhadani Z I, Jabbar A H, Chupradit S, Abbas H, and Kadhim M M, Appl Phys A 128 (2022) 1.
Samavatian M, Gholamipour R, Amadeh A A, and Mirdamadi S, J Non Cryst Solids 506 (2019) 39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2018.12.007.
Zhang J, Oganov A R, Li X, Dong H, and Zeng Q, Phys Chem Chem Phys 17 (2015) 17301.
Martens G, Rabe P, Schwentner N, and Werner A, Phys Rev B 17 (1978) 1481.
Murty B S, Ping D H, Hono K, and Inoue A, Appl Phys Lett 76 (2000) 55.
Zhang J, Wang X, and Li M, J. Alloys Compd. 881 (2021) 160521.
Yang X Y, Ye Y Y, Kramer M J, and Sordelet D J, J Alloys Compd 484 (2009) 914. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.05.078.
Zhang L, Jiang B T, Liang Y F, Huang Y J, and Sun J F, Mater Charact 174 (2021) 111001. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2021.111001.
Delogu F, Molecular dynamics study of size effects in the compression of metallic glass nanowires, Phys Rev B 79 (2009) 184109.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Jasim, S.A., Jabbar, A.H., Bokov, D.O. et al. The Effects of Oxide Layer on the Joining Performance of CuZr Metallic Glasses. Trans Indian Inst Met 76, 239–247 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-022-02739-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-022-02739-7