Abstract
In order to improve sintering strength, the response surface method (RSM) was used to optimize the porosity of sinter based on the actual process parameters of sintering production. The basicity, fuel ratio and fuel particle size were chosen as the design parameters. The porosity of sinter and the drum index were adopted as the responses. A quadratic polynomial model was established, and a three-factor optimization design analysis was carried out. The research results showed that basicity and fuel ratio had significant effects on porosity and drum index, and fuel particle size had little effect on them. The interactions between basicity and fuel ratio, fuel ratio and fuel particle size were significant. A binomial model of sinter porosity and drum index was established by analyzing the experimental results. Through the analysis of RSM, the optimum sintering parameters (basicity, fuel ratio, fuel particle size) could be considered to be 2.15, 71.19 and 5.50%. In addition, industrial experiments under the optimal sintering parameters show that the porosity of sinter decreases to 20.07% and the drum index increases to 78.43%. After the optimization, the sintering strength is improved, which helps to reduce the production cost of blast furnace.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Zhao X L, Tie J, Pan W, Iron and Steel 48 (2013) 18.
Zhang W X, Huang Y L, Zhang Z W, modern mining 7 (2018) 118.
Yang Y H, Standish N, ISIJ Int 31 (1991) 468.
Bhagat R P, Chattoraj U S, Goswami M C, Steel Res Int 78 (2007) 451.
Umadevi T, Bandopadhyay U K, Mahapatra P C, Steel Res Int 81 (2010) 419.
Ma H Z, Xie H W, Wang Y N, Yan C, Green Process Synth 7 (2018) 460.
Ampomah W, Balch R S, Cather M, Will R, Gunda D, Dai Z, Appl Energy 22 (2017) 195.
William A, Robert B, Robert W, Martha C, Dhiraj G, Zhen X D, Energy Procedia 34 (2017) 114.
Zhang X, Zhong Q, Liu C, Rao M J, Peng Z W, Li G H, Jiang T, Sci Rep 11 (2021) 176.
Liu D M, Evans G, Loo C, Chem Eng Res Des 130 (2018) 129.
Xia J, Liu S P, Zhang B, Chen Y G, Metals 11 (2021) 197.
Mirazimi S M J, Rashchi F, Saba M, Sep Purif Technol 116 (2013) 175.
Song H K, Wu S L, Zhou H, China Metallurgy 29 (2019) 15.
Loo C E, Leung W, ISIJ Int 43 (2007) 1393.
Long H, Wu X, Chun T, Di Z, Yu B, Metall Trans B 47 (2016) 1.
Liu D, Loo C E, Evans G, Int J Miner Process 149 (2016) 56.
Lu L, Manuel J, JOM 73 (2021) 306.
Tobin H, Tom H, Geoffrey E, Bélinda G, Powder Technol 339 (2018) 81.
Hou, Choi, Choi, Kang, Ironmaking Steelmaking 38 (2011) 379.
Duckworth W, J Am Ceram Soc 36 (1953) 68.
Simona J, Pavlina P, Silvie B, Alexandria Eng J 57 (2018) 1657.
Harvey T, Honeyands T,Damien O, ISIJ Int 60 (2020) 73.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yi, Z., Liu, Q. & Qin, J. Optimization of Sintering Strength Based on Response Surface Methodology. Trans Indian Inst Met 74, 3085–3092 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-021-02384-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-021-02384-6