Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dynamic Compression Deformation and Constitutive Model of Extruded Mg–1Zn–2Y Bar

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The dynamic compression tests of Mg–1Zn–2Y (wt.%) alloy were carried out by a split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) device at room temperature and a strain rate of 1524–2106 s−1. Based on the electron back-scattering diffraction test result, it was found that with the increase in the strain rate, the proportion of {10_12} 1tensile twinning-basal slip participating in the deformation first increased and then decreased. While the proportion of prismatic < a > slip, pyramidal < a > slip, pyramidal < c + a > slip, dynamic recrystallization, and grain boundary slip in deformation increased gradually. The Johnson–Cook constitutive model of Mg–1Zn–2Y alloy was established by the experimental data. The result of constitutive simulation was very accurate, and the error was controlled within 6%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liu Z, Shi WF, Li JQ, and Mao PL, China Metal Bullet 39 (2009) 21.

  2. Neethu N, Hassan N A, and Kumar R R, Trans Indian Inst Met 10 (2020).

  3. Alan A, and Luo R, Materials Science Forum 419 (2003) 57.

  4. Chen X, Jia Y, and Liao Q, J Alloy Compd 774 (2019) 710.

  5. Hirsch J, and Al-Samman T, Acta Mater 61 (2013) 818.

  6. Zhang J, Wang W, Zhang, T, Yan, Z, and Shi N, Trans Indian Inst Met 37 (2021).

  7. Fata A, Tavakkoli V, and Mohebbi MS, Trans Indian Inst Met 73 (2020) 2601.

  8. Huang X, Suzuki K, and Chino Y, Mater Sci Eng A 633 (2015) 144.

  9. Máthis K, Chmelík F, and M Janecek, Acta Mater 54 (2006) 5361.

  10. Mi A, My B, and De C, Acta Mater 203 (2021) 116491.

  11. Yang Z, Chisholm M F, and Duscher G, Acta Mater 61 (2013) 350.

  12. Hagihara K, Okamoto T, and Izuno H, Acta Mater 109 (2016) 90.

  13. Ju YL, Kim DH, and Lim HK, Mater Lett 29 (2005) 3801.

  14. Chaman-Ara M, Ebrahimi GR, and Ezatpour HR, Chinese J Nonferr Metals 28 (2018) 629.

  15. Mathis K, Farkas G, and Garces G, Mater Lett 190 (2017) 86.

  16. Moon YH, Yi JJ, J Mater Process Tech 70 (1997) 194.

  17. Dong Y, Liu Z, Mao PL, Yu JC, and Wang Z, J Shenyang Univers Tech37(2015) 393.

  18. Li HX, Li C, Ren YP, and Qin GW, J Northeastern Univers (Natur Sci) 36 (2015) 1102.

  19. Niu L, Cao M, and Liang Z, Mater Sci Eng A 789 (2020) 139612.

  20. Qian X, Peng X, and Song Y, Nucl Mater Eng 24 (2020) 100768.

  21. Tang WR, Liu SM, and Liu Z, Mater Sci Eng A 809 (2021) 140994.

  22. Tang WR, Liu SM, and Liu Z, Mater Sci Eng A 780 (2020)139208.1.

  23. Ahmad RI, and Shu WD, Mater Sci Eng A 592 (2014) 40.

  24. Feng F, Huang SY, and Meng ZH, Mater Sci Eng A 594 (2014) 334.

  25. Hou Q Y, and Wang J T, Comput Mater Sci50 (2010) 147.

  26. Wu P D, Guo X Q, and Qiao H, Acta Mater 122 (2017) 369.

  27. Najafizadeh A, and Jonas JJ, Isij Int 46 (2006) 1679.

  28. Nave MD, and Barnett MR, Scr Mater 51 (2004) 881.

  29. Liu YY, Shenyang Univer Technol (2018)

  30. Yamagata H, Scr Metall Mater 27 (1992) 727.

  31. Xiao J, and Shu DW, Metals Mater Inter 21 (2015) 823.

  32. Tang WR, Liu Z, and Liu SM, J Magn Alloys 8 (2020) 1144.

  33. Li WX, Central South Univers Press, (2005) 11.

  34. Zhang F, Liu Z, and Wang Y, J Magn Alloys 8 (2020) 172.

  35. Liu DH, Meng WJ, and Meng JP, J Plast Eng 25 (2018) 161.

  36. Zhou X, Liu X, and Cui S, International J Imp Eng 131 (2019) 282.

  37. Wang J, Yuan X, and Jin P, Materials Res Express 7 (2020) 026522.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The experiment was completed in the Key Laboratory of Magnesium Alloys and the Processing Technology of Liaoning Province. Thanks to all the members of the laboratory. Furthermore, this work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51571145), City of Ningbo "science and technology innovation 2025" major special project (new energy vehicle lightweight magnesium alloy material precision forming technology) (No. 2018B10045).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mechanical and Control Engineering, Baicheng Normal University, Baicheng, 137000, People’s Republic of China

    Wanru Tang & Shuang Kang

  2. School of Mechanical Engineering, Shenyang University of Technology, Shenyang, 110870, People’s Republic of China

    Shuang Kang

  3. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shenyang University of Technology, Shenyang, 110870, People’s Republic of China

    Zheng Liu

Authors
  1. Wanru Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shuang Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zheng Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuang Kang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tang, W., Kang, S. & Liu, Z. Dynamic Compression Deformation and Constitutive Model of Extruded Mg–1Zn–2Y Bar. Trans Indian Inst Met 74, 2967–2975 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-021-02372-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-021-02372-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation