Advertisement

Effect of Shielding Gases in Autogenous Laser Welding of P92 Material

  • B. ShanmugarajanEmail author
  • P. Sathiya
  • G. Buvanashekaran
Technical Paper
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

Shielding gases are used in laser welding mainly for protecting the weldment from contamination during welding and solidification. However, the change in shielding gas composition has shown to alter the properties of the laser welds. In the present work, the effect of shielding gases in CO2 laser welding on metallurgical, hardness and indentation creep properties of P92 material was studied. Experiments were carried out in bead on plate mode using three different shielding gases, viz., Ar, He and Ar + 20% N2. Defect-free welding could be achieved with a wide range of parameters with all the three shielding gases used for experimentation. With respect to bead geometry characteristics, He resulted in good penetration with narrow width followed by Ar + 20% N2 and then Ar. The microstructural analyses indicated that welds had tempered martensitic structure after post-weld heat treatment (PWHT) with no deleterious δ-ferrite phase for a wide range of heat inputs. δ-ferrite phase could be observed at very high heat inputs (> 360 J/mm). The amount of δ-ferrite is dependent on the shielding gas composition. High heat input welds made with Ar + N2 gas mixture had very low δ-ferrite content compared to welds made with He. Hardness values were comparatively higher for welds made with Ar + N2 mixture in both as-welded and PWHT conditions. Indentation creep properties of welds were better than the base material. Among the three shielding gases experimented, welds made with Ar + N2 mixture had superior indentation creep properties followed by welds made with Ar and finally He.

Keywords

P92 Laser welding Shielding gas Argon Helium Argon + Nitrogen Indentation creep testing 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors are thankful to the management of BHEL for allowing us to carry out the presented work and also for permitting us to publish the same. The authors thankfully acknowledge Dr. G. Padmanabham, Director, ARCI, for permitting us to carry out the trials using the facilities at ARCI and the contributions of Mr. K. V. Phani Prabhakar, Scientist ‘E’ and Mr. E. Anbu Rasu, TO of ARCI in carrying out the laser welding trials. Sincere thanks to Mr. R. Easwaran, GM-IC/WRI and Labs for the continuous support and guidance. The authors thankfully acknowledge Dr. R. Nagalakshmi, Mr. R. Ravibharath, Mr. Johnson Clawrence and Mr. P. Mouragane of WRI for their support in characterization of weldments.

References

  1. 1.
    Glowacki M H, J Phys D Appl Phys 28 (1995) 2051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Motlagh NSH, Parvin P, Jandaghi M, and Torkamany MJ, Opt Laser Technol 54 (2013) 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chung BG, Rhee S, and Lee CH, Mater Sci Eng A 272 (1999) 357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    El-Batahgy AM, Mater Lett 32 (1997) 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Reisgen U, Schleser M, Morkov O, and Ahmed E, Appl Surf Sci 257 (2010) 1401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mei L, Chen G, Jin X, Zhang Y, and Wu Q, Opt Lasers Eng 47 (2009) 1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Keskitalo M, Sundqvist J, Mantyjarvi K, Powell J, and Kaplan AFH, Phys Procedia 78 (2015) 222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Patschger A, Sahib C, Bergmann JP, and Bastick A, Phys Procedia 12 (2011) 46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Keskitalo M, Mantyjarvi K, Sundqvist J, Powell J, and Kaplan AFH, J Mater Process Technol 216 (2014) 381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lai R, Cai Y, Wu Y, Li F, and Hua X, J Mater Process Technol 231 (2016) 397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sibillano T, Ancona A, Berardi V, Schingaro E, Baisle G, and Lugara PM, Opt Lasers Eng 44 (2006) 1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang H, Shi Y, Gong S, and Duan A, J Mater Process Technol 184 (2007) 379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gao M, Zheng X, and Hu Q, J Mater Process Technol 184 (2007) 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fellman A, and Kujanppa V, J Laser Appl 18 (2006) 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kubon Z, Foldyna V, and Vodarek V, in Proceedings of Conference on Advances in Materials Technology for Fossil Power Plants (1998) p 257.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Falat L, Vyorstkova A, Homolova V, and Svoboda M, Eng Fail Anal 16 (2009) 2114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vyrostkova A, Homolova V, Pecha J, and Svoboda M, Mater Sci Eng A 480 (2008) 289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mohyla P, Kubon Z, Cepi R, and Samardzic I, Metabk 53 (2014) 175.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shanmugarajan B, Sathiya P, and Buvanashekaran G, J Manuf Process 24 (2016) 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hong SG, Lee WB, and Park CG, J Nucl Mater 288 (2001) 202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sam S, Das CR, Ramasubbu V, Albert SK, Bhaduri AK, Jayakumar T, and Rajendra Kumar E, J Nucl Mater 455 (2014) 343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lin YC, and Chen PY, Mater Sci Eng A 307 (2001) 165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chu SNG, and Li JCM, J Mater Sci 12 (1977) 2200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gibbs WS, Wang SH, Matlock DK, and Olson DL, Weld J 64 (1985) 153s.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Indian Institute of Metals - IIM 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Shanmugarajan
    • 1
    Email author
  • P. Sathiya
    • 2
  • G. Buvanashekaran
    • 1
  1. 1.Welding Research Institute, Bharat Heavy Electricals LtdTiruchirapalliIndia
  2. 2.National Institute of TechnologyTiruchirapalliIndia

Personalised recommendations