Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals

, Volume 72, Issue 1, pp 215–225 | Cite as

Crashworthiness of Thin-Walled Square Steel Columns Reinforced Based on Fractal Geometries

  • Ali DadrasiEmail author
  • Mehdi Beynaghi
  • Sasan Fooladpanjeh
Technical Paper


In this paper, the crashworthiness of steel thin-walled square columns was investigated. These structures were reinforced with three types of reinforcers. The first type was aluminum shells which were placed inside the steel columns based on a specific fractal geometry, and two other types were aluminum and polyurethane foams. All samples were placed under axial loading, and fractals were thinned out up to three stages. At each stage, the effectiveness of aluminum shells alone and also in the presence of polyurethane and aluminum foams has been investigated. Also, the effect of foams' location and in or out of fractal geometry, was studied. The results showed that the presence of reinforcers with different geometries and materials improved the energy absorption. As the fractal geometry of the reinforcers becomes smaller, the energy absorption capacity increases. The presence of the foams well compensated the load–displacement diagram drop after the initial peak and made the energy absorption behavior more ideal. On the other hand, polyurethane foam showed a significant effect on buckling control so that in one of the samples it prevented buckling. Comparison of the studied samples showed that the energy absorption was better when polyurethane foam prevailed. The effect of the second-stage fractal geometry was almost twice the fractal geometry of the first stage. The best choice among the discussed examples was an absorbent in the second stage with foam, in which the polyurethane foam predominated. Finally, some results were validated.


Specific energy absorption Thin-walled structure Fractal Aluminum foam Polyurethane foam 



The authors wish to put across gratitude to Mr. Kazem Karimi from Ferdowsi University of Mashhad for his great favors in presenting valuable and constructive comments.


  1. 1.
    Song J, Chen Y, and Lu G, Int J Mech Sci 66 (2013) 239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yan L, Chouw N, and Jayaraman K, Mater. Des 56 (2014) 528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mirfendereski L, Salimi M, and Ziaei-Rad S, Int J Mech Sci 50 (2008) 1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ahmad Z, Thambiratnam D P, and Tan A C C, Int J Impact Eng 37 (2010) 475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Abramowicz W, Thin Wall Struct 41 (2003) 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang R, Han L H, and Hou C C, J Costr Steel Rse 80 (2013) 188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hernalsteen P, and Leblois L C, Nucl Eng Des 37 (1976) 373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Elfetori F, Abdewi K, Sulaiman S, Hamouda A M S, and Mahdi E, Thin Wall Struct 46 (2008) 320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mikkelson L P, Int J Solids Struct 36 (1999) 643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sun H, Wang J, Shen G, and Hu P, J Mech Sci Technol 30 (2016) 3105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yang Z, Yan H, and Huang C, Thin Wall Struct 82 (2014) 24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wierzbicki T, Bhat S U, and Abramowicz W, Int J Solids Struct 29 (1992) 3269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jinhui J, and liwang Z, J. East China Shipbuild Inst 16 (2002) 28.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yao S, Sun L, and Ma X, J Mech Sci Technol 30 (2016) 1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Arabzadeh H, and Zeinoddini M, Procedia Eng 14 (2011) 648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Xin L, Jinyu X, Jingsal Z, Yuan G, Liangxue N, and Weimin L, Thin Wall Struct 95 (2015) 24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Alavi Nia A, and Parsapour M, Thin Wall Struct 74 (2014) 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ahmad Z, and Thambiratnam D P, Mater Des 30 (2009) 2393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rezvani M, and Jafarian B, Int J Mech Sci 126 (2016) 270.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhifang L, Zhichao H, and Qinghua Q, Compos Struct 175 (2017) 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Briody C, Duignan B, and Jerrams S, ECCMR 2011.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liu Z, Huang Z, and Qin Q, Compos Struct 175 (2017) 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hussein R D, Ruan D, Lu G, Guillow S, and Yoon J. W, Thin Wall Struct 110 (2017) 140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Indian Institute of Metals - IIM 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Shahrood BranchIslamic Azad UniversityShahroodIran
  2. 2.Adiban Institute of Higher EducationGarmsarIran

Personalised recommendations