A New Hot Tearing Assessment by Using Stepped Ring Core Mold and the Effect of Strontium on the Hot-Tearing Resistance of Al–6 wt% Zn Based Alloy
- 395 Downloads
Abstract
Automobile and aerospace industries use thin wall aluminium alloy castings which provide lighter structures with excellent mechanical properties. Production of thin wall castings is more challenging due to hot tear formation. Lack of fluidity in molten alloy causes hot tears and must be addressed in thin wall castings of Al-alloys. The present study is focused on a new technique known as stepped ring mould casting. It is possible to assess the hot tear susceptibility of Al–6Zn alloys by varying ring thickness to find out the critical thickness for occurrence of hot tears. The alloy was cast using different strontium (Sr) concentrations (0.2, 0.4, 0.6%). Effects of strontium concentrations were studied in terms of fluidity, porosity content, microstructure and tensile properties of Al–6Zn alloy. In the present work, unmodified and Sr modified alloy casts were characterized by SEM, EDS and XRD respectively. Al–6Zn ingots were procured by master alloy route. Repetition of stepped ring test on the critical thickness showed that hot tear were successfully eliminated significantly due to the addition of Sr. On the other hand, 0.6% Sr also exhibited a good amount of porosity and decrease in elongation. Shorter fluidity length was observed in 0.2% Sr modified alloy. Mechanical and metallographic tests revealed that the alloy castings modified with 0.4% Sr offered better results in yield strength, less porosity and an improved hot tear resistance at micro and macro levels.
Keywords
Al–6Zn alloy Hot tearing Microstructure FractographyNotes
Acknowledgements
We thank Mr. Harit (Gold medalist-Metal casting), Mr. Baleshwar, senior lab technicians in foundry laboratory of Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, mechanical division for giving technical advices in performing casting experiments successfully.
References
- 1.Campbell J, Complete Casting Handbook, 2nd edn, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford (1991).Google Scholar
- 2.Liao C, Chen J, and Pan C, Proc Eng 27 (2012) 805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Birru A K, Benny K, and Mahapatra M M, Trans Indian Inst Met 65 (2012) 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Viswanathan S, and Apelian D, ASM Handbook (2008), vol 15.Google Scholar
- 5.Eskin G, and Katgerman L, Metall Mater Trans A 38A (2007) 1511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Rappaz M, and Drezet JM, Metall Mater Trans A 30 (1999) 449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Li S, Hot Tearing in Cast Aluminum Alloys, PhD dissertation (2010).Google Scholar
- 8.Clyne T W, Mater Sci Eng 65 (1983) 111.Google Scholar
- 9.Birru A K, and Benny K, Int J Adv Manuf Technol 45 (2009) 851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Kwon Y D, and Lee Z H, Mater Sci Eng A 360 (2003) 372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Lashgari H, Sufizade R, and Emamy A R, Mater Des 31 (2010) 2187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Esfahani M, Nasr N, and Niroumand B, Mater Charact 61 (2010) 318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Liang S M, Engstler M, and Groten V, J Alloys Compd 610 (2014) 443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Liao C, Chen J, and Li Y, J Mater Sci Technol 28 (2012) 524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Langan T J, Pickens J R, Heubaum F H, and Kramer L S, Aluminum Alloy Formulations for Reduced Hot Tear Susceptibility, US20080299001 A1.Google Scholar
- 16.Lin S, Aliravci C, and Pekguleryuz M, Metall Mater Trans A 38 (2007) 1056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Ravi K R, Pillai R M, and Amaranathan K R, J Alloys Compd 456 (2008) 201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Sui Y, Wang Q, and Wang G, J Alloys Compd 622 (2015) 572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Prukkanon W, Srisukhumbowornchai N, and Limmaneevichitr C, J Alloys Compd 487 (2009) 453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Eskin G, and Katgerman L, Metal Mater Trans A 38A (2007) 1511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Eskin G, and Suyitno A, Progress Mater Sci 49 (2004) 629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Nafisi S, and Ghomashchi R, J Alloys Compd 436 (2007) 86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Reza N M, and Niroumand B, Metall Mater Trans A 45 (2014) 3699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Srikanth S, and Jacob T K, Mater Res Adv Tech 82 (1991) 675.Google Scholar
- 25.Vijeesh V, and Ravi M, Mater Perform Charact 2 (2014) 296.Google Scholar
- 26.Razaghian A, and Emamy M, Mater Charact 60 (2009) 1361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Dargusch M S, Zhu S M, and Nie J F, Scr Mater 60 (2009) 116.Google Scholar
- 28.Li M, and Wang H, Mater Des 31 (2010) 2483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Nasresfahani M, and Niroumand B, Met Mater Int 14 (2010) 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Viswanathan S, and Apelian D, ASM Handbook (2008), vol 15.Google Scholar
- 31.Okamoto H, J Phase Equilib Diffus 26 (2005) 394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Liao C, and Pan C, Proc Eng 27 (2012) 805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Sequoia S, Bruzzone G, and Merlo F, J Less Common Met 39 (1975) 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Liang S M, Engstler M, and Groten V, J Alloys Compd 610 (2014) 443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar