Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of Friction on the Response of Small Punch Test

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Small specimen test techniques are suitable for assessing the current mechanical properties of in-service components using small volume samples compared to conventional tests. Small punch test is a reliable test method for predicting the post-yield response. The effect of lubrication of the punch-specimen interface on the load–displacement response and strain distribution in the specimen is presented here. Lubricating the punch-specimen interface reduces the ultimate load and also moves the failure site closer to the pole of the punch. It is found that the loading slope changes as a function of displacement. However, its effect on the plastic properties like strength coefficient and strain hardening exponent was considerably less (~6 % with respect to dry condition). Interrupted tests were conducted at different fractions of ultimate load which revealed that the peak strain was greater in dry condition than the lubricated case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Manahan M P, Argon A S, and Harling O K, J Nucl Mater 103, 104 (1981) 1545.

  2. Fleury E, and Ha J S, Int J Press Vessels Pip 75 (1998) 699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mao X, and Takahashi H, J Nucl Mater 150 (1987) 42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fleury E, and Ha J S, KSME Int J 12 (1998) 827.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eskner M, and Sandstrom R, J Test Eval 32 (2004) 1.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Isselin J, and Shoji T, J Test Eval, 37 (2009) 1.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bayoumi M R, and Bassim M N, Int J Fract, 23 (1983) 71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Baik J M, Kameda J, and Buck O, ASTM STP 888 (1986) 92.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dobes F, and Milicka K, Mater Sci Eng A 510–511 (2009) 440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Izaki T, Kobayashi T, Kusumoto V, and Kanaya A, Int J Press Vessels Pip 86 (2009) 637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bai T, Chen P, and Guan K, Mater Sci Eng A 561 (2012) 498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim J H, Oh S I, and Kobayashi S, Int J Mach. Tool Des Res, 18 (197) 209.

  13. Lee H S, and Yang D Y, Int J Mech Sci 33 (1991) 435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang Y M, Int J Adv Manuf Technol 33 (2007) 1114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Marciniak Z, Duncan J L, and Hu S J, Mechanics of Sheet Metal Forming, (2nd edn.), Butterworth-Heinemann, London (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Prakash R V, and Arunkumar S, ASTM STP 1576 6 (2014) 168.

    Google Scholar 

  17. García T E, Rodríguez C, Belzunce F J, Suárez C, J Alloys Compd 582 (2014) 708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Xu Y, Ning G, Zhang C, Yu Q, Xu Y, Int J Press Vessels Pip 77 (2000) 715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raghu V. Prakash.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prakash, R.V., Arunkumar, S. Influence of Friction on the Response of Small Punch Test. Trans Indian Inst Met 69, 617–622 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-015-0769-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-015-0769-4

Keywords

Navigation