Abstract
This paper attempts to trace the development of an unusual and skilled class of alloys, of binary high-tin bronze (i.e. alloys of only copper with a higher percentage of tin), which are found from surprisingly early contexts from Indian antiquity. In particular, the deliberate use was made of binary beta bronze with around 22–24 % tin, specifically exploiting the properties of higher hot-forgability of bronze of this composition due to the formation of the high temperature beta intermetallic compound phase of 22.9 % tin. Quenching resulted in the retention of the beta phase, yielding a musical alloy with golden lustre and improved tensile strength as compared to the as-cast state. Examples of hot forged and quenched high-tin beta bronzes studied by the author from the South Indian Iron Age and megalithic cultures from Tamil Nadu and Maharashtra and Gandharan Grave Culture of Taxila are summarised here ranking amongst the earliest and most finely wrought such finds. There are technological and morphological similarities to surviving high-tin bronze crafts practices documented by the author in Kerala since 1990. Since the 1990’s she has also documented the making of high-tin delta bronze mirrors at Aranmula with a composition closer to the pure delta phase of 32.6 % tin, which instead exploited the specular properties this alloy while managing its brittleness. Although it is difficult to speculate about origins, a long standing practice of using binary tin–bronzes (i.e. only copper–tin alloys) can be detected going back to Harappan bronzes which also seem to be predominantly binary bronzes with not much lead added to them. Though most of these seem to be low-tin bronze, the presence of a couple with higher tin of about 20 % is also notable in terms of the above discussion.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allchin B, and Allchin R, Rise of Civilisation in India and Pakistan, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1982).
Amiet P, Halim M A, Jansen M, Jarrige C, Les CitésOubliées de l’Indus. Musée National des Arts AsiatiquesGuimet and Association Française d’Action Artistiques, Paris (1988).
Bennett A, and Glover I, in Southeast Asian Archaeology, (ed) Glover I, University of Hull, Yorkshire (1990) 187.
Biswas A K, Minerals and Metals in Ancient India, Vol. I, D K Printworld, New Delhi (1996).
Breeks J W, An Account of the Primitive Tribes and Monuments of the Nilgiris, India Office, London (1873).
Chakrabarti D K, and Lahiri N, Copper and its Alloys in Ancient India, Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi (1996).
Craddock P T, in (eds) Oddy W A, and Zwalf W, Aspects of Tibetan Metallurgy, British Museum occasional paper no. 15, London (1981) 23.
Gunter A, and Jett P, Ancient Iranian Metalwork, Arthur M Sackler Gallery and the Freer Gallery of Art, Washington (1992).
Jarrige J-F, Arts Asiatiques 50 (1995) 5.
Keay J, India Discovered. The Achievement of the British Raj, Windward (1981).
Kenoyer J M, Ancient Cities of the Indus Valley Civilization, Oxford University Press, Karachi (1998).
Leshnik L S, South Indian ‘Megalithic’ Burials. The Pandukal Complex, Franz Steiner, Weisbaden (1974).
Paramasivan S, ‘Investigations on ancient Indian metallurgy: a pre-historic bronze bowl’. In: Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences, Sex A (1941) 13.
Mackay E, Further Excavations at Mohenjo daro, Government of India Press, New Delhi (1938).
Malroney C, Archaeology of South India- accomplishments and prospects. In: Burton Stein (Ed). Essays in South India. The University Press of Hawaii, Hawaii (1975).
Marshall J, Mohenjo daro and the Indus Civilization, Vol. 3, Arthur Probsthain, London (1931).
Marshall J, Taxila, University Press, Cambridge (1951).
Meeks N, in Metal Plating and Patination-Cultural, Technical and Historical Developments, (eds) La Niece S, and Craddock P, Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford (1993) 247.
Muhly J D, Am J Archaeol 89 (1985) 275.
Paramasivan S, Investigations on ancient Indian metallurgy. In: Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences on a pre-historic bronze bowl 13 (1941) 87.
Pillai S G K, Pillai R M, and Damodaran A D, J Met 44 (1992) 40.
Rajpitak W, and Seeley N J, World Archaeol 11 (1979) 31.
Reedy C, in The Crossroads of Asia. Transformation of Image and Symbol in the Art of Ancient Afghanistan and Pakistan, (eds) Errington E, Cribb J, Claringbull M, The Ancient India and Iran Trust, Cambridge (1992) 241.
Schulten C, J Met 48 (1996) 60.
Srinivasan S, in South Asian Archaeology, (eds) Parpola A, and Koskikallio P, In: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference of the European Association of South Asian Archaeologists held in Helsinki University, 5–9 July 1993 SuomalainenTiedeakatemia, Vol. II, Helsinki (1994) 695.
Srinivasan S, The Enigma of the Dancing ‘Pancha-loha’ (Five-metalled) Icons: Archaeometallurgical and Art Historical Investigations on South Indian Bronzes, Unpublished Ph D Thesis, University College, London (1996).
Srinivasan S, South Asian Studies 13 (1997a) 209.
Srinivasan S, in Archaeological Sciences 1995, (eds) Sinclair A, Slater A, and Gowlett J, In: Proceedings of a conference on the application of scientific techniques to the study of archaeology, Liverpool, July 1995, Oxbow Monograph 64, Oxford (1997b) 136.
Srinivasan S, in Archaeometallurgy in India, (ed) Tripathi V, In: Proceedings of the First National Seminar in Indian Archaeometallurgy held in Oct 1991, Varanasi, Sharda Publishing Ltd., New Delhi (1998a) 241.
Srinivasan S, J Met (1998b) 50.
Srinivasan S, and Glover I, J Hist Metall 29 (1995) 69.
Srinivasan S, and Glover I, Current Science 93 (2007) 35.
Srinivasan S, in Encyclopedia of the History of Science, Technology and Medicine in Non-Western Cultures, Vol. 2, (ed) Selin H, Springer, Berlin (2008) 1699.
Srinivasan S, in ‘50 years of Southeast Asian Archaeology: Essays in Honour of Ian Glover,’ (eds) Bellina B, Pryce O, Bacus E, Christie J W, River Books, Bangkok (2010) 239.
Srinivasan S, and Glover I, Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings in Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology V, Vol. 462, (eds) Vandiver P, Druzik J, Merkel J, Stewart J, Warrendale (1997) 81.
Srinivasan S, and Ranganathan S, Trans Indian Inst Met 59 (2006) 829.
Srinivasan S, Ranganathan S, and Suwas ‘Ultra high-carbon steels and high-tin bronzes:insights into mechanical properties and processing from Indian traditional knowledge’, Poster and published abstract, ICSMA 16, International conference on Strength of Materials, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, Aug 19–24, (2012).
Acknowledgments
The past support in the analyses of Institute of Archaeology, University College London the Freer Gallery of Art, Smithsonian Institution, Washington is acknowledged and currently of National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bangalore and Indian Institute of Science, Department of Metallurgy. The author is grateful to her husband Digvijay Mallah for the assistance in the fieldwork in Kerala to the artisan workshops in the early 1990’s which rank amongst the earliest identifications made of these crafts as binary high-tin bronze crafts. The support of late N. Seeley, I. Glover, A. Bennet, J. A. Charles, N. Meeks, London, T. Chase, P. Jett, Smithsonian, S. Ranganathan, NIAS & IISc, Bangalore, V.N. Misra, Deccan College, M. Kenoyer, R. Allchin, R. Krishnamurthy, Dinamalar and K. Rajan, Tamil University, Tanjavur and Kalyadi Copper Unit of Hutti Gold Mines, are acknowledged as well as the past support to the research of Railway Mine and Plantation Equipment, London, British Council, New Delhi, Ancient India and Iran Trust, UK and DST. Some of the preliminary ideas in this paper had been put forth at a conference on ‘Indus Archaeology’ held at University of Wisconsin Madison in 1998 organised by Mark Kenoyer and the author is grateful for the earlier support of the Homi Bhabha Research Council, Mumbai, and S. M. Chitre and H. D. Pajnigar in this.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Srinivasan, S. Megalithic and Continuing Peninsular High-Tin Binary Bronzes: Possible Roots in Harappan Binary Bronze Usage?. Trans Indian Inst Met 66, 731–737 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-013-0291-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-013-0291-5