Skip to main content
Log in

Study of Fluid Flow and Mixing Behaviour of a Vacuum Degasser

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent times the demand of ultra-low carbon steel (ULCS) with improved mechanical properties such as good ductility and good workability has been increased as it is used to produce cold-rolled steel sheets for automobiles. For producing ULCS efficiently, it is necessary to improve the productivity of the vacuum degassers such as RH, DH and tank degasser. Recently, it has been claimed that using a new process, called REDA (revolutionary degassing activator), one can achieve the carbon content below 10 ppm in less time. As such, REDA process has not been studied thoroughly in terms of fluid flow and mass transfer which is a necessary precursor to understand and design this process. Therefore, momentum and mass transfer of the process has been studied by solving momentum and species balance equations along with k–ε turbulent model in two-dimension (2D) for REDA process. Similarly, computational fluid dynamic studies have been made in 2D for tank and RH degassers to compare them with REDA process. Computational results have been validated with published experimental and theoretical data. It is found that REDA process is the most efficient among all these processes in terms of mixing efficiency. Fluid flow phenomena have been studied in details for REDA process by varying gas flow rate, depth of immersed snorkel in the steel, diameter of the snorkel and change in vacuum pressure. It is found that design of snorkel affects the melt circulation in the bath significantly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kitamura S, Miyamoto K, and Tsujino R, Tetsu to Hagane 80 (1994) 101.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Domgin J F, Gardin P, Saint-Raymond H, Stouvenot F, and Huin D, Steel Res Int 76 (2005) 5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kitamura S, Harashima K, Tsutsumi N, and Yano M, Tetsu to Hagane 80 (1994) 213.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nobuhiro M, Felicia L, Hiroshi N, Gupta G S, and Shin-ya K, ISIJ Int 50 (2010) 89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kitamura S, Aoki H, Miyamoto K, Furuta H, Yamashita K, and Yonezawa K, ISIJ Int 40 (2000) 455.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Taniguchi S, Okada Y, Sakai A, and Kikuchi A, in Proc of 6th Int Iron & Steel Congress, ISIJ, Nagoya (1990), 394.

  7. Guo D, and Irons G A, Metall Mater Trans B 31 (2000) 1447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mondal M, Gupta G S, Kitamura S, and Maruoka N, in Proc CHEMECA 2008, Perth, Sept 2008.

  9. Mondal M, Maruoka N, Kitamura S, and Gupta G S, Arch Metall Mater 55 (2010) 1131.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kitamura S, Aoki H, and Miyamoto K, 8th Japan–China Symp On Sci & Tech of Iron & Steel, (1998), p 110.

  11. Aoki H, Kitamura S, and Miyamoto K, I & SM, (1999), 17.

  12. Guo D, and Irons G A, Mater Trans B 31B (2000b) 1457.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Johansen S T, and Boysan F, Metall Mater Trans B 19B (1988) 755.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Joo S, and Guthrie R I L, Metall Trans B 23B (1992) 765.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Szekely J, and Asai S, Trans ISIJ 15 (1975) 270.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mazumdar D, and Guthrie R I L, Metall Mater Trans B 16B (1985) 83.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Park Y, Doo W, Yi K, and An S, ISIJ Int 40 (2000) 749.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Park Y, and Yi K, ISIJ Int 43 (2003) 1403.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Launder B E, and Spalding D B, Comp Methods Appl Mech Eng 3 (1974) 269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shrirabe K, and Szekely J, Trans ISIJ 23 (1983), 465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Johansen S T, Robertson D G C, Woje K, Engh T A, Metall Mater Trans B 19B (1988) 745.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhu M Y, Inomoto T, Sawada I, and Hsiao T C, ISIJ Int 35 (1995) 472.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kuwabara T, Umezawa K, Mori K, and Watanabe H, Trans Iron Steel Inst Japan 28 (1988) 305.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kurokawa N, in Proc of 5th Int Conf for Licenses of the RH Process, Thyssen Stahl Aktiengesellschaft, Duisburg, (1987) p 61.

  25. Neifer M, Rodi S, and Sucker D, Steel Res 64 (1993) 54.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

One of the authours (GSG) would like to thank Tohoku University (IMRAM, Sendai, Japan) for inviting him as Visiting Professor.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. S. Gupta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mondal, M.K., Maruoka, N., Kitamura, S. et al. Study of Fluid Flow and Mixing Behaviour of a Vacuum Degasser. Trans Indian Inst Met 65, 321–331 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-012-0136-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-012-0136-7

Keywords

Navigation