Abstract
Xanthan gum biopolymers have gained increasing attention in geotechnical engineering due to the effectiveness and environmental-friendliness, and are proposed as a potential alternative to conventional materials for soil stabilization. Cyclic wetting and drying are the crucial factors that affect the behavior of surface soil, which are also a major challenge for biopolymer applications. This study aims to investigate the strength durability of xanthan gum-treated soil during wetting–drying cycles. The soil was treated with different contents of xanthan gum (0, 0.5, 1.5% by the mass of dry soil) and a total of 12 wetting–drying cycles were applied. Unconfined compression tests were performed to evaluate the changes in soil mechanical properties. The changes in microstructure were observed using nuclear magnetic resonance technology and scanning electrical microscopy. The results showed that soil mechanical properties decreased significantly in the first four cycles, and then tended to equilibrium. The compressive strength of soil treated with 1.5% xanthan gum could be approximately twice than that of non-treated soil after 12 cycles, and its strength reduction caused by wetting–drying cycling is about 20% less than that of the latter. When increasing the water content at drying stage, specimens subjected to wetting–drying cycles with less moisture change presented higher compressive strength, in which case the effectiveness of biopolymer treatment can be maximally retained. Xanthan gum treatment conferred great resistance to wetting–drying cycling due to its cementation and aggregation effects. The presence of xanthan gum leads to more inter-aggregate pores with a radius of about 0.1–1 μm and limits the development of macropores. The strengthening effect of xanthan gum depends on direct clay particle–biopolymer interactions and inter-particle connection formed by xanthan gum matrix. From the results, xanthan gum biopolymers can significantly improve the mechanical properties of soil at shallow depth even after wetting–drying cycles.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data will be made available on request.
References
Bouazza A, Gates WP, Ranjith PG (2009) Hydraulic conductivity of biopolymer-treated silty sand. Géotechnique 59:71–72. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2007.00137
Cabalar AF, Wiszniewski M, Skutnik Z (2017) Effects of xanthan gum biopolymer on the permeability, odometer, unconfined compressive and triaxial shear behavior of a sand. Soil Mech Found Eng 54:356–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11204-017-9481-1
Chang I, Im J, Prasidhi AK, Cho GC (2015a) Effects of xanthan gum biopolymer on soil strengthening. Constr Build Mater 74:65–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.10.026
Chang I, Prasidhi AK, Im J, Shin HD, Cho GC (2015b) Soil treatment using microbial biopolymers for anti-desertification purposes. Geoderma 253:39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.04.006
Chang I, Im J, Cho GC (2016) Geotechnical engineering behaviors of gellan gum biopolymer treated sand. Can Geotech J 53:1658–1670. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2015-0475
Che W, Liu J, Hao S, Ren J, Song Z, Bu F (2022) Application of colloid-sand coating treated by a hydrophilic polysaccharide biopolymer material for topsoil stability control. Geoderma 424:115994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.115994
Chen R, Ding X, Ramey D, Lee I, Zhang L (2016) Experimental and numerical investigation into surface strength of mine tailings after biopolymer stabilization. Acta Geotech 11:1075–1085. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-015-0420-x
Chen C, Wu L, Perdjon M, Huang X, Peng Y (2019) The drying effect on xanthan gum biopolymer treated sandy soil shear strength. Constr Build Mater 197:271–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.120
Chen C, Wu L, Harbottle M (2020) Exploring the effect of biopolymers in near-surface soils using xanthan gum-modified sand under shear. Can Geotech J 57:1109–1118. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2019-0284
Cheng Z, Geng X (2021) Soil consistency and interparticle characteristics of various biopolymer types stabilization of clay. Geomech Eng 27:103–113. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2021.27.2.103
Dehghan H, Tabarsa A, Latifi N, Bagheri Y (2019) Use of xanthan and guar gums in soil strengthening. Clean Technol Environ Policy 21:155–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-018-1625-0
Deng Y, Yue X, Liu S, Chen Y, Zhang D (2015) Hydraulic conductivity of cement-stabilized marine clay with metakaolin and its correlation with pore size distribution. Eng Geol 193:146–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.04.018
Garcia-Ochoa F, Santos VE, Casas JA, Gómez E (2000) Xanthan gum: production, recovery, and properties. Biotechnol Adv 18:549–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0734-9750(00)00050-1
Hamid W, Lemboye K, Dhowian A (2022) Characteristics and treatment of expansive soil using biopolymer. Arab J Geosci 15:411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-09690-3
Horpibulsuk S, Rachan R, Chinkulkijniwat A, Raksachon Y, Suddeepong A (2010) Analysis of strength development in cement-stabilized silty clay from microstructural considerations. Constr Build Mater 24:2011–2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.03.011
Hu Z, Peng K, Li L, Ma Q, Xiao H, Li Z, Ai P (2019) Effect of wetting-drying cycles on mechanical behaviour and electrical resistivity of unsaturated subgrade soil. Adv Civ Eng 2019:3465327. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3465327
Khatami HR, O’Kelly BC (2013) Improving mechanical properties of sand using biopolymers. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 139:1402–1406. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0000861
Kumar SA, Sujatha ER, Pugazhendi A, Jamal MT (2023) Guar gum-stabilized soil: a clean, sustainable and economic alternative liner material for landfills. Clean Technol Environ Policy 25:323–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02032-z
Kwon YM, Ham SM, Kwon TH, Cho GC, Chang I (2020) Surface-erosion behaviour of biopolymer-treated soils assessed by EFA. Geotech Lett 10:106–112. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgele.19.00106
Latifi N, Horpibulsuk S, Meehan CL, Abd Majid MZ, Rashid ASA (2016) Xanthan gum biopolymer: an eco-friendly additive for stabilization of tropical organic peat. Environ Earth Sci 75:825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5643-0
Latifi N, Horpibulsuk S, Meehan CL, Abd Majid MZ, Tahir MM, Mohamad ET (2017) Improvement of problematic soils with biopolymer—an environmentally friendly soil stabilizer. J Mater Civ Eng 29:04016204. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0001706
Lee S, Chang I, Chung MK, Kim Y, Kee J (2017) Geotechnical shear behavior of xanthan gum biopolymer treated sand from direct shear testing. Geomech Eng 12:831–847. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2017.12.5.831
Lee S, Chung M, Park HM, Song KI, Chang I (2019) Xanthan gum biopolymer as soil-stabilization binder for road construction using local soil in Sri Lanka. J Mater Civ Eng 31:06019012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0002909
Muguda S, Booth SJ, Hughes PN, Augarde CE, Perlot C, Bruno AW, Gallipoli D (2017) Mechanical properties of biopolymer-stabilised soil-based construction materials. Geotech Lett 7:309–314. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgele.17.00081
Noorzad R, Ta’negonbadi B (2018) Mechanical properties of expansive clay stabilized with lignosulphonate. Q J Eng Geol Hydrog 51:483–492. https://doi.org/10.1144/qjegh2017-050
Rahmati M, Pohlmeier A, Abasiyan SMA, Weihermueller L, Vereecken H (2019) Water retention and pore size distribution of a biopolymeric-amended loam soil. Vadose Zone J 18:180205. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj201811.0205
Rashid ASA, Latifi N, Meehan CL, Manahiloh KN (2017) Sustainable improvement of tropical residual soil using an environmentally friendly additive. Geotech Geol Eng 35:2613–2623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-017-0265-1
Rehan R, Nehdi M (2005) Carbon dioxide emissions and climate change: policy implications for the cement industry. Environ Sci Policy 8:105–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2004.12.006
Seo S, Lee M, Im J, Kwon YM, Chung MK, Cho GC, Chang I (2021) Site application of biopolymer-based soil treatment (BPST) for slope surface protection: In-situ wet-spraying method and strengthening effect verification. Constr Build Mater 307:124983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124983
Singh SP, Das R (2020) Geo-engineering properties of expansive soil treated with xanthan gum biopolymer. Geomech Geoeng 15:107–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2019.1632495
Smitha S, Rangaswamy K (2020) Effect of biopolymer treatment on pore pressure response and dynamic properties of silty sand. J Mater Civ Eng 32:04020217. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0003285
Soldo A, Miletic M, Auad ML (2020) Biopolymers as a sustainable solution for the enhancement of soil mechanical properties. Sci Rep 10:267. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-57135-x
Sujatha ER, Atchaya S, Sivasaran A, Keerdthe RS (2021) Enhancing the geotechnical properties of soil using xanthan gum-an eco-friendly alternative to traditional stabilizers. Bull Eng Geol Environ 80:1157–1167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-020-02010-7
Sun Y, Zhai C, Xu J, Cong Y, Qin L, Zhao C (2020) Characterisation and evolution of the full size range of pores and fractures in rocks under freeze-thaw conditions using nuclear magnetic resonance and three-dimensional x-ray microscopy. Eng Geol 271:105616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105616
Ta’negonbadi B, Noorzad R (2017) Stabilization of clayey soil using lignosulfonate. Transp Geotech 12:45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2017.08.004
Tang CS, Cui YJ, Shi B, Tang AM, Liu C (2011) Desiccation and cracking behaviour of clay layer from slurry state under wetting-drying cycles. Geoderma 166:111–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.07.018
Tang CS, Wang DY, Cui YJ, Shi B, Li J (2016a) Tensile strength of fiber-reinforced soil. J Mater Civ Eng 28:04016031. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0001546
Tang CS, Wang DY, Shi B, Li J (2016b) Effect of wetting-drying cycles on profile mechanical behavior of soils with different initial conditions. CATENA 139:105–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2015.12.015
Tang CS, Cheng Q, Leng T, Shi B, Zeng H, Inyang HI (2020) Effects of wetting-drying cycles and desiccation cracks on mechanical behavior of an unsaturated soil. CATENA 194:104721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2020.104721
Tian BG, Cheng Q, Tang CS, Zeng H, Xu JJ, Shi B (2022) Effects of compaction state on desiccation cracking behaviour of a clayey soil subjected to wetting-drying cycles. Eng Geol 302:106650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106650
Wang S, Zhao X, Zhang J, Jiang T, Wang S, Zhao J, Meng Z (2023) Water retention characteristics and vegetation growth of biopolymer-treated silt soils. Soil till Res 225:105544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2022.105544
Zhao Y, Ren S, Jiang D, Liu R, Wu J, Jiang X (2018) Influence of wetting-drying cycles on the pore structure and mechanical properties of mudstone from simian mountain. Constr Build Mater 191:923–931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.069
Zhou C, So PS, Chen XW (2020) A water retention model considering biopolymer-soil interactions. J Hydrol 586:124874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124874
Acknowledgements
This research work was supported by Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (Grant no. KYCX21_0533) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 41902300).
Funding
This research work was supported by Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (Grant no. KYCX21_0533) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 41902300).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Zhihao Chen: Investigation, Writing – original draft, Funding acquisition. Jin Liu: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. Ying Wang: Investigation, Validation. Changqing Qi: Methodology, Writing – review & editing, Funding acquisition. Xiaofan Ma: Investigation. Wenyue Che: Writing – review & editing. Ke Ma: Investigation.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, Z., Liu, J., Wang, Y. et al. Wetting–drying effects on the mechanical performance of xanthan gum biopolymer-stabilized soil. Environ Earth Sci 83, 197 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-024-11483-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-024-11483-8