Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The impact of agricultural land use change on agricultural GHG emissions in China

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The agricultural field is a major source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Therefore, we aimed to estimate agricultural GHG emissions to aid the reduction of GHG emissions from agricultural systems. We used the emission factor method, CLUMondo model to quantitatively calculate agricultural GHG emissions at the interprovincial and regional scales in China. Additionally, we qualitatively analysed the spatial distribution, carbon source structure, and gas types of agricultural GHG emissions at various stages. The results revealed that the spatial pattern of agricultural land in 2035 will generally be consistent with that in 2020 under the natural development scenario. Overall, agricultural GHG emissions will continue to increase. The simulation results showed that in east, south, southwest, and central China, the agricultural GHG emissions remained high, and gradually, the region in the southwest and northeast China emerged as an agglomeration of provinces with high agricultural GHG emissions. Notably, crop farming and animal husbandry acted as the primary source of agricultural GHG emissions in China. Overall, methane emissions increased marginally, nitrous oxide emissions increased substantially, and their proportion gradually approached 50%. Thus, to reduce the agricultural GHG emissions in China, the GHG emissions from crop farming and animal husbandry should be reduced. The target spatial pattern construction should be that of agricultural land with low GHG emissions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data and materials can be obtained from the author on reasonable request.

References

  • Amundson R, Berhe AA, Hopmans JW et al (2015) Soil and human security in the 21st century. Science 348(6235):1261071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai Z, Ma L, Jin S et al (2016) Nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium flows through the manure management chain in China. Environ Sci Technol 50(24):13409–13418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyer RM, Hua FY, Martin PA et al (2022) Relocating croplands could drastically reduce the environmental impacts of global food production. Commun Earth Environ. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00360-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burney JA, Davis SJ, Lobell DB (2010) Greenhouse gas mitigation by agricultural intensification. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:12052–12057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson KM, Gerber JS, Mueller ND et al (2017) Greenhouse gas emissions intensity of global croplands. Nat Clim Change 7:63–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S, Gong B (2021) Response and adaptation of agriculture to climate change: evidence from China. J Dev Econ 148:102557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen KX, Tao WH, Fang XL et al (2022a) Carbon neutrality assessment and planning application path in territorial spatial planning. Planners 38:134–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen MP, Cui YR, Jiang S et al (2022b) Toward carbon neutrality before 2060: trajectory and technical mitigation potential of non-CO2 greenhouse gas emissions from Chinese agriculture. J Clean Prod 368:133186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark MA, Domingo NGG, Colgan K et al (2020) Global food system emissions could preclude achieving the 1.5℃ and 2℃ climate change targets. Science 370(6517):705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cong XH, Shi FZ, Ruan XM et al (2019) Effects of nitrogen application rate on nitrogen use efficiency and key enzymes for carbon and nitrogen metabolism in different rice varieties. J Henan Agric Univ 53(03):325–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui X, Zhou F, Ciais P et al (2021) Global mapping of crop-specific emission factors highlights hotspots of nitrous oxide mitigation. Nature Food 2:886–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debonne N, van Vliet J, Heinimann A et al (2018) Representing large-scale land acquisitions in land use change scenarios for the Lao PDR. Reg Environ Change 18:1857–1869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Ecology and Environment of Guangdong Province (2020) Guidelines for greenhouse gas inventorying in the cities, counties and districts of Guangdong province (Trial). http://gdee.gd.gov.cn/attachment/0/505/505999/3026402.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2023

  • Ding ML, Yang XN, Zhao RQ et al (2022) Optimization of territorial space pattern under the goal of carbon neutrality: theoretical framework and practical strategy. J Nat Resour 37(5):1137–1147

    Google Scholar 

  • Eitelberg DA, van Vliet J, Doelman JC et al (2016) Demand for biodiversity protection and carbon storage as drivers of global land change scenarios. Global Environ Change 40:101–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans CD, Peacock M, Baird AJ et al (2021) Overriding water table control on managed peatland greenhouse gas emissions. Nature 593(7860):548–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan SL, Zhang L, Zeng ZS et al (2017) Factors influencing land intensive use of development zone in regions with different levels of economic development: a case study in Fujian Province. China Land Sci 31:51–58

    Google Scholar 

  • He ZC, Zhao CH, Li GY et al (2020) From spatial planning to land use change: difference, current situation, challenge, and future direction. City Plan Rev 044:9–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong C, Burney JA, Pongratz J et al (2021) Global and regional drivers of land-use emissions in 1961–2017. Nature 589:554–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong C, Zhao H, Qin Y et al (2022) Land-use emissions embodied in international trade. Science 376:597–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: the Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for policymakers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007b) Climate Change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability: contribution of working group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2012) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation: special report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2013) Climate Change 2013: the Physical Science Basis Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2022) “Mitigation pathways compatible with 1.5°C in the context of sustainable development.” In: Global Warming of 1.5°C: IPCC Special Report on Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels in context of strengthening response to climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Janssens-Maenhout G, Crippa M, Guizzardi D et al (2017) EDGAR v4.3.2 global atlas of the three major greenhouse gas emissions for the period 1970–2012. Earth Syst Sci Data Discuss. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-959-2019

  • Jin G, Deng XZ, Zhao XD et al (2018) Spatiotemporal patterns in urbanization efficiency within the Yangtze River Economic Belt between 2005 and 2014. J Geogr Sci 28:1113–1126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Bai J, Ralph O (1998) Assessment of biomass resource availability in China[M]. China Environmental Science Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu M, Yang L (2021) Spatial pattern of China’s agricultural carbon emission performance. Ecol Indicat 133:108345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Vitousek P, Chang Y et al (2015) Evidence for a historic change occurring in China. Environ Sci Technol 50:505–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of Hefei (2022) Report on the Development of China’s Straw Industry 2021. http://nyncj.hefei.gov.cn/zwxx/ztzl/jgzhlyzt/14835943.html. Accessed 15 Jan 2023

  • Ministry of Ecology and Environment, PRC (2018) Third national communication on climate change of the People’s Republic of China. http://www.mee.gov.cn/ywgz/ydqhbh/wsqtkz/201907/P020190701762678052438.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2023

  • National Development and Reform Commission, PRC (2011) Guidelines for Provincial Greenhouse Gas Inventories (Trial). http://www.cbcsd.org.cn/sjk/nengyuan/standard/home/20140113/download/shengjiwenshiqiti.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2023

  • Poore J, Nemecek T (2018) Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science 360:987–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudel TK, Coomes OT, Moran E et al (2005) Forest transitions: towards a global understanding of land-use change. Glob Environ Chang 15(1):23–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian HQ, Xu RT, Canadell JG et al (2020) A comprehensive quantification of global nitrous oxide sources and sinks. Nature 586(7828):248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verburg PH, Alexander P, Evans T et al (2019) Beyond land cover change: towards a new generation of land use models. Curr Opin Environ Sustainability 38:77–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu YL, Zhang P, Yu YY et al (2021) Progress review on and prospects for non-grain cultivated land in China from the perspective of food security. China Land Sci 35:116–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang BL, Yang QY, Lu CY et al (2011) Effect on economic development of regional land use change indifferent development phase: forty counties in chongqing as the research object. Econ Geogr 31:1539–1544+7

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang G, Lu F, Zhao H et al (2017) Residue usage and farmers’ recognition and attitude toward residue retention in China’s croplands. J Agro-Environ Sci 36:981–988

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang WJ, Yan SJ, Zhang J et al (2021) Win-win strategy for national food security and agricultural double-carbon goals. Sci Agric Sinica 54:3892–3902

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang XX, Wu LY, Ma XZ et al (2022) Dynamic computable general equilibrium simulation of agricultural greenhouse gas emissions in China. J Clean Prod 345:131122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao RQ, Huang XJ, Zhong TY et al (2013) Carbon effect evaluation and low-carbon optimization of regional land use. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng 29:220–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu XH, Zhang Y, Zhu YY (2023) Regional regulation and interregional coordination of cultivated land protection inChina from the perspective of “greater food” approach. Acta Geogr Sin 78:2147–2162

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 42171395, No. 41801298), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China (Grant BK20220126, BK20180348).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Geography and Ocean Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023, China

    Hu Yi & Li Manchun

  2. College of Public Administration, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China

    Jiang Penghui

  3. Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science and Technology, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023, China

    Hu Yi, Jiang Penghui & Li Manchun

  4. Key Laboratory for Land Satellite Remote Sensing Applications of Ministry of Natural Resources, Nanjing, 210023, China

    Hu Yi, Jiang Penghui & Li Manchun

Authors
  1. Hu Yi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jiang Penghui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Li Manchun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, HY; methodology, HY; investigation, JP; writing—original draft preparation, HY; writing—review and editing, LM. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiang Penghui.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 57 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yi, H., Penghui, J. & Manchun, L. The impact of agricultural land use change on agricultural GHG emissions in China. Environ Earth Sci 83, 61 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-023-11369-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-023-11369-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation