Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Ecological engineers or underground plumbers? Mechanisms of the biological activities in controlling soil pipes and gully headcuts

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Investigating soil pipes and pipe collapses that lead to gully headcut formation, and considering the role of biological activities leads to a better understanding of soil erosion processes. Soil organisms and animal activities can both increase soil erosion by creating underground tunnels that may lead to the formation of soil pipes, and decrease it by reinforcing plant presence, soil porosity, and soil stability as a result of their mixing activities. The main aim of this study was to assess the role of plant and animal species on soil pipe formation in a semi-arid region affected severely by piping and gully erosion. The study was conducted in the Sarakhs Plain, in the Razavi Khorasan Province in Iran. Four study sites were selected: a slope with erosion (i.e., gully headcuts and pipe collapses), a slope without erosion, a location with dominant plant species (i.e., Artemisia annua, Camphorosma monspeliaca), and a location with dominant animal species [i.e., Formicidae (ants), termites, and Libycus Merio]. Four groups of methods were applied: bioecological tests (microbial respiration and biomass, ecological stoichiometry, and spatial point pattern analysis), geophysical test (ground penetration radar—GPR), geochemical–microscopic tests (scanning electron microscope—SEM, energy-dispersive X-ray—EDX, microanalysis TIN section, X-ray diffraction), and pedological analyses (doing soil profiles in the field and laboratory analyses of physical and chemical properties of soil samples taken in the field) to design models which can help to explain the formation of closed depressions, underground tunnels, and gully headcuts. The results showed that wherever the microbial respiration was increased, the greater the number of underground tunnels was formed. In the case of ecological stoichiometry, there was a significant difference between the slope without erosion and other test locations. The positive relationship between soil piping and biological activities was proved by bivariate pair correlation tests. The effects of soil organisms on piping were positively recognized using GPR. The results of EDX in the slope with erosion showed the presence of SiO2 and Al2O3, although there were small amounts of Na (Albite) and Ca (Wollastonite) in regions with dominant animal species, and K (MAD-10 Feldspar) in regions with dominant plant species. The TIN section made on the slope with erosion showed high silt content in comparison with the slope without erosion. The physical and chemical soil properties in four test groups, using the Duncan statistical test, showed the highest levels of significance in silt content, calcium carbonate, and bulk density. Finally, we have presented models of soil piping processes resulting from the action of living organisms. We confirmed a complex relationship between biological activity and soil pipe formation underlining the need for further interdisciplinary research on these relationships to better understand land degradation processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Alaboz P, Dengiz O, Demir S, Şenol H (2021) Digital mapping of soil erodibility factors based on decision tree using geostatistical approaches in terrestrial ecosystem. CATENA 207:105634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkon PU (1999) Microhabitat to landscape impacts: crested porcupine digs in the Negev Desert highlands. J Arid Environ 41(2):183–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen DC, Cardinale BJ, Wynn-Thompson T (2016) Plant biodiversity effects in reducing fluvial erosion are limited to low species richness. Ecology 97(1):17–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayele GK, Gessess AA, Addisie MB, Tilahun SA, Tebebu TY, Tenessa DB, Langendoen EJ, Nicholson CF, Steenhuis TS (2016) A biophysical and economic assessment of a community-based rehabilitated gully in the Ethiopian highlands. Land Degrad Dev 27:270–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babu GLS, Vasudevan AK (2008) Seepage velocity and piping resistance of coir fiber mixed soils. J Irrig Drain Eng-Asce 134:485–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee AK (1972) Morphology and genesis of ’pipe structure’ in ferralitic soils of Midnapore District, West Bengal. J Indian Soc Soil Sci 20:399–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Berberoglu S, Cilek A, Kirkby M, Irvine B, Donmez C (2020) Spatial and temporal evaluation of soil erosion in Turkey under climate change scenarios using the Pan-European Soil Erosion Risk Assessment (PESERA) model. Environ Monit Assess 192:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berendse F, van Ruijven J, Jongejans E, Keesstra S (2015) Loss of plant species diversity reduces soil erosion resistance. Ecosystems 18:881–888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernatek-Jakiel A, Nadal-Romero E (2022) Can soil piping impact environment and society? Identifying new research gaps. Earth Surf Process Landf. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernatek-Jakiel A, Kacprzak A, Stolarczyk M (2016) Impact of soil characteristics on piping activity in a mountainous area under a temperate climate (Bieszczady Mts., Eastern Carpathians). CATENA 141:117–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernatek-Jakiel A, Vannoppen W, Poesen J (2017) Assessment of grass root effects on soil piping in sandy soils using the pinhole test. Geomorphology 295:563–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchart E, Albrecht A, Brown G, Decaens T, Duboisset A, Lavelle P, Mariani L, Roose E (2004) Effects of tropical endogeic earthworms on soil erosion. Agric Ecosyst Environ 104(2):303–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burri K, Gromke C, Graf F (2013) Mycorrhizal fungi protect the soil from wind erosion: a wind tunnel study. Land Degrad Dev 24:385–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bruyn LL, Conacher AJ (1990) The role of termites and ants in soil modification—a review. Soil Res 28(1):55–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Faulkner H (2007) Improvements to the dispersion status of piped gully soils following reworking and stabilisation by vegetation. CATENA 70(3):410–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2006.11.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank-Kamenetskaya OV, Ivanyuk GY, Zelenskaya MS, Izatulina AR, Kalashnikov AO, Vlasov DY, Polyanskaya EI (2019) Calcium oxalates in lichens on surface of apatite-nepheline ore (Kola Peninsula, Russia). Minerals 9:656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funmilayo O (1977) Distribution and abundance of moles (Talpa europea L.) in relation to physical habitat and food supply. Oecologia 30(3):277–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geng H, Liu R, Zheng W, Zhang Y, Xie R, Guo Y, Pan B (2021) Interaction between animal burrowing and loess cave formation in the Chinese Loess Plateau. Front Earth Sci 9:806921. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.806921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghalandarayeshi S, Nord-Larsen T, Johannsen VK, Larsen JB (2017) Spatial patterns of tree species in Suserup Skov—a semi-natural forest in Denmark. For Ecol Manag 406:391–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gholamhosseinian A, Sepehr A, Sohrabi M, Emadodin I (2021) Assessing the role of lichens in the prevention of dust emission in dryland: case study at north-eastern Iran. Aeol Res 50:100697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths BS, Spilles A, Bonkowski M (2012) C:N:P stoichiometry and nutrient limitation of the soil microbial biomass in a grazed grassland site under experimental P limitation or excess. Ecol Process 1:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guida G, Nicosia A, Settanni L, Ferro V (2023) A review on effects of biological soil crusts on hydrological processes. Earth Sci Rev 243:104516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden J (2005) Piping and woody plants in peatlands: cause or effect? Water Resour Res 41(6):W06009. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Illian J, Penttinen A, Stoyan H, Stoyan D (2008) Statistical analysis and modelling of spatial point patterns, vol 70. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jouquet P, Janeau JL, Pisano A, Sy HT, Orange D, Minh LTN, Valentin C (2012) Influence of earthworms and termites on runoff and erosion in a tropical steep slope fallow in Vietnam: a rainfall simulation experiment. Appl Soil Ecol 61:161–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang H, Fahey TJ, Bae K, Fisk M, Sherman RE, Yanai RD, See CR (2016) Response of forest soil respiration to nutrient addition depends on site fertility. Biogeochemistry 127:113–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kariminejad N, Hosseinalizadeh M, Pourghasemi HR, Bernatek-Jakiel A, Alinejad M (2019) GIS-based susceptibility assessment of the occurrence of gully headcuts and pipe collapses in a semi-arid environment: Golestan Province, NE Iran. Land Degrad Dev 30:2211–2225. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kariminejad N, Hosseinalizadeh M, Pourghasemi HR, Tiefenbacher JP (2021) Change detection in piping, gully head forms, and mechanisms. CATENA 206:105550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King C, Baghdadi N, Lecomte V, Cerdan O (2005) The application of remote-sensing data to monitoring and modelling of soil erosion. CATENA 62:79–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lan G, Getzin S, Wiegand T, Hu Y, Xie G, Zhu H, Cao M (2012) Spatial distribution and interspecific associations of tree species in a tropical seasonal rain forest of China. PLoS ONE 7(9):e46074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Bayon RC, Moreau S, Gascuel-Odoux C, Binet F (2002) Annual variations in earthworm surface-casting activity and soil transport by water runoff under a temperate maize agroecosytem. Geoderma 106:121–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma B, Zhu W, Huang Q (2021) Imaging shallow fault structures by three-dimensional reverse time migration of ground penetration radar data. J Appl Geophys 190:104342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng X, Kooijman AM, Temme AJAM, Cammeraat ELH (2022) The current and future role of biota in soil-landscape evolution models. Earth Sci Rev 226:103945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montanarella L, Pennock DJ, McKenzie N, Badraoui M, Chude V, Baptista I, Mamo T, Yemefack M, Aulakh MS, Yagi K, Hong SY, Vijarnsorn P, Zhang GL, Arrouays D, Black H, Krasilnikov P, Sobocká J, Alegre J, Henriquez CR, Mendonça-Santos MDL, Taboada M, Espinosa-Victoria D, AlShankiti A, AlaviPanah SK, Mustafa Elsheikh EA, Hempel J, Arbestain MC, Nachtergaele F, Vargas R (2016) World’s soils are under threat. Soil 2:79–82. https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2-79-2016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuutinen V, Butt KR (2003) Interaction of Lumbricus terrestris L. burrows with field subdrains. Pedobiologia 47(5–6):578–581

    Google Scholar 

  • Onda Y, Itakura N (1997) An experimental study on the burrowing activity of river crabs on subsurface water movement and piping erosion. Geomorphology 20(3–4):279–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-555X(97)00029-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orgiazzi A, Panagos P (2018) Soil biodiversity and soil erosion: it is time to get married: adding an earthworm factor to soil erosion modelling. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 27:1155–1167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker GG, Higgins CG (1990) Piping and pseudokarst in drylands. In: Higgins CG, Coates DR (eds) Groundwater geomorphology. the role of subsurface water in earth-surface processes and landforms. Geological Society of America Special Paper 252. Boulder, pp 77–110. https://doi.org/10.1130/SPE252-p77

  • Poesen J (2018) Soil erosion in the Anthropocene: research needs. Earth Surf Proc Landf 43:64–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichman OJ, Seabloom EW (2002) The role of pocket gophers as subterranean ecosystem engineers. Trends Ecol Evol 17:44–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ripley BD (1977) Modelling spatial patterns. J Roy Stat Soc Ser B (methodol) 39:172–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy P, Pal SC, Chakrabortty R, Towfiqul Islam ARM, Chowdhuri I, Saha A (2023) The role of indigenous plant species in controlling the erosion of top soil in sub-tropical environment: in-situ field observation and validation. J Hydrol 625:129993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sardans J, Janssens IA, Ciais P, Obersteiner M, Peñuelas J (2021) Recent advances and future research in ecological stoichiometry. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 50:125611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaetzl RJ, Johnson DL, Burns SF, Small TW (1989) Tree uprooting: review of terminology, process, and environmental implications. Can J for Res 19:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scimeca M, Bischetti S, Lamsira HK, Bonfiglio R, Bonanno E (2018) Energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) microanalysis: a powerful tool in biomedical research and diagnosis. Eur J Histochem EJH 62(1)

  • Sidle RC, Noguchi S, Tsuboyama Y, Laursen K (2001) A conceptual model of preferential flow systems in forested hillslopes: evidence of self-organization. Hydrol Process 15(10):1675–1692. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somasundaram J, Singh RK, Prasad SN, Sethy BK, Kumar A, Ramesh K, Lakaria BL (2011) Management of black Vertisols characterized by pot-holes in the Chambal region, India. Soil Use Manag 27:124–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun C, Lux S, Müller E, Meffert M, Gerthsen D (2020) Versatile application of a modern scanning electron microscope for materials characterization. J Mater Sci 55:13824–13835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker BB, Kurtz LT (1961) Calcium and magnesium determinations by EDTA titrations. Soil Sci Soc Am J 25:27–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Afferden M, Hansen AM, Kaiser C, Chapelain N (2006) Laboratory test system to measure microbial respiration rate. Int J Environ Pollut 26:220–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verachtert E, Van Den Eeckhaut M, Poesen J, Deckers J (2010) Factors controlling the spatial distribution of soil piping erosion on loess-derived soils: a case study from central Belgium. Geomorphology 118:339–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verachtert E, Van Den Eeckhaut M, Martínez-Murillo JF, Nadal-Romero E, Poesen J, Devoldere S, Wijnants N, Deckers J (2013) Impact of soil characteristics and land use on pipe erosion in a temperate humid climate: field studies in Belgium. Geomorphology 192:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vos M, Wolf AB, Jennings SJ, Kowalchuk GA (2013) Micro-scale determinants of bacterial diversity in soil. FEMS Microbiol Rev 37:936–954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu G, Zhao C, Jalilian A, Waagepetersen R, Zhang J, Guan Y (2020) Nonparametric estimation of the pair correlation function of replicated inhomogeneous point processes. Electron J Stat 14:3730–3765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Liu J, Yang Y, Yang X (2021) Application of GPR detection technology in Beijing Bell and Drum Towers’ safety detection. In: 2021 4th international conference on geoinformatics and data analysis, pp 35–40

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (FUM), Mashhad, Iran. Proofreading of this publication has been supported by a grant from the Faculty of Geography and Geology under the Strategic Programme Excellence Initiative at the Jagiellonian University.

Funding

The authors have not disclosed any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Engineering, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

    Narges Kariminejad

  2. Lands Division, Department of Resources, Queensland Government, Ipswich, QLD, 4305, Australia

    Adel Sepehr

  3. Faculty of Geography and Geology, Institute of Geography and Spatial Management, Jagiellonian University, Ul. Gronostajowa 7, 30-387, Kraków, Poland

    Anita Bernatek-Jakiel

  4. Instituto Pirenaico de Ecología, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (IPE-CSIC), Campus de Aula Dei, P.O. Box 13.034, Zaragoza, Spain

    Estela Nadal-Romero

  5. Australian Rivers Institute and School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, Australia

    Mehran Rezaei Rashti

Authors
  1. Narges Kariminejad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Adel Sepehr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anita Bernatek-Jakiel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Estela Nadal-Romero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mehran Rezaei Rashti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The manuscript is written by the activities of all authors together. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Narges Kariminejad or Adel Sepehr.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

We further confirm that any aspect of the work covered in this manuscript that has involved human patients has been conducted with the ethical approval of all relevant bodies and that such approvals are acknowledged within the manuscript. We confirm that the manuscript has been read and approved by all named authors. We also confirm that the order of authors listed in the manuscript has been approved by all named authors.

Consent for publication

We understand that this Corresponding Author is the sole contact for the Editorial process. He is responsible for communicating with the other authors about progress, submissions of revisions, and final approval of proofs.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kariminejad, N., Sepehr, A., Bernatek-Jakiel, A. et al. Ecological engineers or underground plumbers? Mechanisms of the biological activities in controlling soil pipes and gully headcuts. Environ Earth Sci 82, 595 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-023-11302-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-023-11302-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation