Skip to main content
Log in

A new quantitative welding degree classification for ignimbrites

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As a pyroclastic rock type, ignimbrites may reveal varying degrees of welding depending on the temperature (> 535 ℃) and overburden pressure conditions during its formation. The welding degree of ignimbrites increases as the formation temperature and the thickness of the overburden deposit in the depositional environment escalate, which are the most crucial factors controlling the rate of welding in ignimbrites. With the increasing temperature, plastic deformation is observed in ignimbrites and the glassy minerals are being welded. Furthermore, the thickness of the overburden causes the deformation of the ash matrix in ignimbrites at the lower sections and the pumice grains are flattened at different rates. An increase in the degree of welding of ignimbrites causes an improvement in the physical and mechanical properties of the rock material as well. Within the scope of this research, petrographical, mineralogical, and geochemical studies were carried out on a total of 16 different ignimbrite types, which have different color and texture properties, obtained from three different regions of Turkey (Kayseri, Nevşehir, Ahlat) where ignimbrites extensively crop out, and the physical and mechanical properties of these samples were revealed. Consequently, a new welding classification was developed for ignimbrites considering the uniaxial compressive strength and dry unit weight. The proposed welding classification consists of six classes ranging from non-welded to highly welded. When the welding degrees of the selected ignimbrites are evaluated, Kayseri ignimbrites mostly exhibit moderate welding characteristics. Nevşehir ignimbrites, on the other hand, have a low welding degree whereas the degree of welding in Ahlat ignimbrites may vary from low to high. Additionally, long and short axis lengths of pumice grains in the ignimbrite specimens were determined by measuring under the microscope, and shape ratios were determined by different shape parameter evaluation methods. As a result, it has been concluded that the pumice grains in Kayseri and Ahlat ignimbrites have a more lenticular structure than the pumice grains in Nevşehir ignimbrites. Eventually, the welding degree classes of ignimbrites and the classification developed by using threshold values of the oblateness ratio (OR) values of pumice grains at different welding degrees are quite compatible. The proposed welding degree classification is of great importance in the selection of ignimbrites widely used as dimension stone and in terms of engineering classification of this rock type as well as it will guide to the scientific studies to be performed on ignimbrites with varying physical and mechanical properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig.12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ANON (1979) Classification of rocks and soils for engineering geological mapping part 1: rock and soil materials. Bull Int Assoc Eng Geol 19:355–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Bostancı,M. (2016) İgnimbiritlerin (Nevşehir Bölgesi) Kapiler Su Emme Davranışlarının İncelenmesi. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 79 sayfa (in Turkish).

  • Bozdağ A, Bayram AF, İnce İ, Asan K (2016) The relationship between weathering and welding degree of pyroclastic rocks in the Kilistra ancient city, Konya (Central Anatolia, Turkey). J Afr Earth Sc 123:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braney MJ, Kokelaar P (1992) A reappraisal of ignimbrite emplacement: progressive aggradation and changes from particulate to non-particulate flow during emplacement of high-grade ignimbrite. Bull Volcanol 54:504–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çadır S (2018) Piroklastik Kayaçlarda Mikro-Yapının Fiziksel ve Mekanik Özellikler Üzerine Etkisi. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 91 sayfa (in Turkish).

  • Deer WA, Howie RA, Zussman J (1992) An Introduction to the Rock-forming Minerals. Longman Scientific and Technical, ISBN 0470218096. pp 696.

  • Dinçer İ, Bostancı M (2019) Capillary water absorption characteristics of some Cappadocian ignimbrites and the role of capillarity on their deterioration. Environ Earth Sci 78:7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freundt A, Schmincke HU (1995) Eruption and emplacement of a basaltic welded ignimbrite during caldera formation on Gran Canaria. Bull Volcanol 56:640–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gifkins CC, Allen RL, McPhie J (2005) Apparent welding textures in altered pumice-rich rocks. J Volcanol Geoth Res 142:29–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gürbüz, S., 2019. Nevşehir Yöresindeki İgnimbiritlerin Dayanımının Tahmininde Schmidt Geri Sıçrama Değerlerinin Kullanımı. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 59 sf (in Turkish).

  • ISRM, 2007. The Complete ISRM Suggested Methods for Rock Characterization, Testing and Monitoring: 1974–2006. Suggested Methods Prepared by the Commission on Testing Methods, International Society for Rock Mechanics, Compilation Arranged by the ISRM Turkish National Group Ankara, Turkey. pp 628.

  • Kemikkıran, Ö., F., 2019. Nevşehir Yöresindeki İgnimbiritlerin Fiziksel ve Mekanik Özellikleri ile P-dalga Hızı Arasındaki İlişkilerin İncelenmesi. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 79 sf (in Turkish).

  • Koralay T, Özkul M, Kumsar H, Çelik SB, Pektaş K (2011) The effect of welding degree on geotechnical properties of an ignimbrite flow unit: the Bitlis castle case (Eastern Turkey). Environ Earth Sci 64:869–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korkanç M, Solak B (2016) Estimation of engineering properties of selected tuffs by using grain/matrix ratio. J Afr Earth Sc 120:160–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leake BE, Woolly AR, Arps CES, Birch WD, Gilbert MC, Grice JD, Hawthorne FC, Kato A, Kisch HJ, Krivovichev VG (1997) Nomenclature of Amphiboles. Report of the Subcommittee on Amphiboles of the International Mineralogical Association Commission on New Minerals Names, European. J Mineral 9:623–651

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsley DH, Andersen DJ (1983) A two pyroxene thermometer. J Geophys Res 88:887–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhr JF, Carmichael ISE, Varekamp JC (1984) The 1982 eruptions of El Chicón Volcano, Chiapas, Mexico: mineralogy and petrology of the anhydrite-bearing pumices. J Volcanol Geoth Res 23:69–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middlemost EAK (1994) Naming materials in the magma/igneous rock system. Earth Science Review 37:215–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon VG (1993) Microstructural controls on the geomechanical behaviour of ignimbrite. Eng Geol 35:19–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morimoto MJ, Fabries AK, Ferguson IV, Ginzburg M, Ross FA (1988) Nomenclature of pyroxenes. Mineral Mag 52:535–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mues-Schumacher U, Schumacher R, Viereck-Götte G, Lepetit P (2004) Areal distribution and bulk rock density variations of the welded İncesu ignimbrite, Central Anatolia. Turkey. Turk J Earth Sci. 13:249–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundula F, Cioni R, Rizzo R (2009) A simplified scheme for the description of textural features in welded ignimbrites: the example of San Pietro Island (Sardinia, Italy). Ital. J. Geosci. 128(3):615–627

    Google Scholar 

  • Pola A, Macías J, Crosta G, Fusi N, Martinez-Martinez J (2016) Geomechanical characterization of different lithofacies of the Cuitzeo ignimbrites. Eng Geol 214:79–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putirka KD (2008) Introduction to minerals, inclusions and volcanic processes. Rev Mineral Geochem 69:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quane SL, Russell JK (2005a) Ranking welding intensity in pyroclastic deposits. Bull Volcanology 67:129–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quane SL, Russell JK (2005b) Welding: insights from high-temperature analogue experiments. J Volcanol Geoth Res 142:67–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridolfi F (2021) Amp-TB2: an updated model for calcic amphibole thermobarometry. Minerals 11(3):324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid R (1981) Descriptive nomenclature and classification of pyroclastic deposits and fragment: recommendations of the IUGS subcommissions on the systematics of igneous rocks. Geology 9:41–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selçuk L, Beyaz T (2021) Welding intensity assessment of pyroclastic units based on engineering quality requirements. Arab J Geosci 14:382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan MF, Ragan DM (1976) Compaction of ash-flow tuffs. In: Chilingarian GV, Wolf KH (eds) Compaction of coarse-grained sediments, II. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 677–717

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith RL (1960) Zones and Zonal variations in welded ash flows. U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 354:149–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Streck MJ, Grunder AL (1995) Crystallization and welding variations in a widespread ignimbrite sheet: the Rattlesnake Tuff, eastern Oregon, USA. Bull Volcanol 57:151–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tischendorf G, Gottesmann B, Forster HJ, Trumbull RB (1997) On Li-bearing micas: estimating Li from electron microprobe analysis and an improved diagram for graphical representation. Mineral Mag 61:809–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tran NH (2007) Fracture orientation characterization: minimizing statistical modelling errors. Comput Stat Data Anal 51(6):3187–3196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker GPL (1983) Ignimbrite types and ignimbrite problems. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 17:65–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by the Scientific Research Projects Coordination Office of the Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University (project number BAP18F25). We deeply thank the Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Office for the financial support.

Funding

Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi, BAP18F25.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Authors Mutluhan Akin, Tamer Topal, İsmail Dinçer, Muge K. Akin and Ayse Orhan wrote the main manuscript text. The figures are prepared by Muge K. Akin, Ayse Orhan, Ali Ozvan and Mutluhan Akin. The laboratory tests were performed by Mutluhan Akin, İsmail Dinçer, Ahmet Orhan and Ali Ozvan. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mutluhan Akin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akin, M., Topal, T., Dinçer, İ. et al. A new quantitative welding degree classification for ignimbrites. Environ Earth Sci 82, 345 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-023-11026-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-023-11026-7

Keywords

Navigation