Skip to main content
Log in

Efficiency of micropollutant removal through artificial recharge and riverbank filtration: case studies of Káraný, Czech Republic and Dresden-Hosterwitz, Germany

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of pharmaceuticals and personal care products’ (PPCP) removal in the waterworks at Káraný (Czech Republic) and Dresden-Hosterwitz (Germany). Both waterworks use similar technology of drinking water production (combination of bank filtration and artificial recharge) and have similar river water quality (Jizera and Elbe river). A comparison of 2-year monitoring results shows high efficiency of removing PPCP contained in river water. However, at both waterworks, there are groups of substances for which natural treatment steps alone are not sufficient. In the case of Káraný, it is benzotriazole, sulfamethoxazole, and methylparaben; in the Dresden waterworks, it is oxypurinol, sulfamethoxazole, carbamazepine, and lamotrigine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Data is available through the University of Life Sciences, Department of Water Resources and Environmental Modeling in Prague.

Abbreviations

GAC:

Granular activated carbon filtration

PPCPs:

Pharmaceutical and personal care products

WWTP:

Waste water treatment plant

MAR:

Managed aquifer recharge

ESI+:

Electrospray ionization at positive voltage

ESI−:

Electrospray ionization at negative voltage

LOD:

Limits of detection

LOQ:

Limit of quantification

UHQ:

Ultra-high quality

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Káraný Waterworks and DREWAG-Stadtwerke Dresden GmbH for enabling monitoring and assessment of interpretations and the laboratory of the Vltava River Basin Authority for assistance in the interpretation of laboratory data.

Funding

This research was completed with support from the boDEREC-CE project. This project has received funding from the European Union´s INTERREG Research and Development Programme under Project Index Number CE1412. 

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ZH and YA prepared the manuscript and all authors read and approved the manuscript, DR and YA took part in fieldwork and performed graphical and statistical interpretations. ZH and YA interpreted the data, and ZH and TG were responsible for the overall coordination of the research and editing of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zbyněk Hrkal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hrkal, Z., Adomat, Y., Rozman, D. et al. Efficiency of micropollutant removal through artificial recharge and riverbank filtration: case studies of Káraný, Czech Republic and Dresden-Hosterwitz, Germany. Environ Earth Sci 82, 155 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-023-10785-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-023-10785-7

Keywords

Navigation