Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Landscape ecological risk assessment of Yulin Region in Shaanxi Province of China

  • Thematic Issue
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Landscape ecological risk assessment is a basic content of studying the relationship between landscape and ecosystem. It can reveal the spatial–temporal heterogeneity and scale effects of ecological risks, and provide the comprehensive spatial characterization and visualization of multisource risks. Yulin is a typical agropastoral zone in the north of China. Land use and land cover (LULC) changes are frequent and intense, and the landscape ecological environment is very fragile. This study analyzed the change characteristics of land use and land cover of Yulin by ArcGIS, assessed the landscape ecological risks using 4 landscape metrics, and discussed the spatial–temporal trends and the influencing factors for the landscape ecological risk. The results show that the absolutely dominant land use and land cover types in Yulin are grassland and cultivated land. The changes mainly happened in grassland, artificial surface, cultivated land, and bare land, with the variation of − 2.83%, 1.85%, 1.35%, and − 0.23%, respectively. High landscape ecological risks are mainly distributed in Yuyang and part of Jingbian. Most part of Yulin region belongs to the risk grade of Low/Medium and Medium. No statistically significant temporal trends of landscape ecological risk is observed. Variation of grassland, cultivated land, and bare land has more impacts on the landscape fragmentation than other land use and land cover. Risk grades of High and Medium/High mainly cover the lower normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) region (0.1–0.4) at the edge of the Mu Us desert. The relationship between the landscape ecological risk and the NDVI reveals that the extent, continuity, pattern, and the type of vegetation cover are influencing factors for the landscape ecological risk from the view of the local habitats. The study results may be helpful for the vegetation restoration, land use planning, and sustainable development of the Yulin and other similar regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ai J, Yu K, Zeng Z, Yang L, Liu Y, Liu J (2022) Assessing the dynamic landscape ecological risk and its driving forces in an island city based on optimal spatial scales: Haitan Island China. Ecol Indic 137:108771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akcakaya HR (2001) Linking population-level risk assessment with landscape and habitat models. Sci Total Environ 274:283–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(01)00750-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aksu GA, Musaoglu N, Uzun A (2017) An auxiliary tool for landscape evaluation: ecological risk analysis based on analytic hierarchy process. Fresenius Environ Bull 26:84–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayre KK, Landis WG (2012) A Bayesian approach to landscape ecological risk assessment applied to the upper Grande Ronde Watershed, Oregon. Hum Ecol Risk Assess Int J 18:946–970. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2012.707925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett GW, Barrett TL, Wu J (2015) History of landscape ecology in the United States. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bayliss P, van Dam RA, Bartolo RE (2012) Quantitative ecological risk assessment of the Magela Creek Floodplain in Kakadu National Park, Australia: comparing point source risks from the ranger uranium mine to diffuse landscape-scale risks. Hum Ecol Risk Assess Int J 18:115–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2012.632290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourgoin C, Oszwald J, Bourgoin J, Gond V, Blanc L, Dessard H, Phan TV, Sist P, Läderach P, Reymondin L (2020) Assessing the ecological vulnerability of forest landscape to agricultural frontier expansion in the central highlands of Vietnam. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 84:101958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2019.101958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao Q, Zhang X, Lei D, Guo L, Sun X, Kong F, Wu J (2019) Multi–scenario simulation of landscape ecological risk probability to facilitate different decision–making preferences. J Clean Prod 227:325–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • (CGIAR) Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research (2021) CGIAR–CSI SRTM–SRTM 90m DEM Digital elevation database. https://srtm.csi.cgiar.org/. Accessed 12 Apr 2021

  • Chen J, Dong B, Li H, Zhang S, Peng L, Fang L, Zhang C, Li S (2020) Study on landscape ecological risk assessment of Hooded Crane breeding and overwintering habitat. Environ Res 187:109649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher JT, Burton AC, Nolan L, Roy L (2020) Influences of landscape change and winter severity on invasive ungulate persistence in the Nearctic boreal forest. Sci Rep 10:8742. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65385-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Focks A (2014) The Challenge: landscape ecotoxicology and spatially explicit risk assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem 33:1193–1193. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.2568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT, Godron M (1986) Landscape ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Friggens M, Mueller S, Williams M (2020) Using science management partnerships to develop landscape level indicators and assessments to measure vulnerability of Pinon-Juniper woodlands. Ecol Ind. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong J, Cao E, Xie Y, Xu C, Li H, Yan L (2021) Integrating ecosystem services and landscape ecological risk into adaptive management: Insights from a western mountain–basin area China. J Environ Manag 281:111817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He S, Wu J (2019) Relationships of groundwater quality and associated health risks with land use/land cover patterns: a case study in a loess area, northwest China. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 25(1–2):354–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2019.1570463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He S, Li P, Wu J, Elumalai V, Adimalla N (2020) Groundwater quality under land use/land cover changes: a temporal study from 2005 to 2015 in Xi’an, northwest China. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 26(10):2771–2797. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2019.1684186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández C, Echeverría C, Nelson C (2021) Evolution and emerging research trends in the ecological impacts of landscape change: perspectives from a Chilean biodiversity hotspot. Landscape Ecol 36:1587–1603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-021-01247-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes CM, Brown CD, Hamer M, Jones R, Maltby L, Posthuma L, Silberhorn E, Teeter JS, Warne MSJ, Weltje L (2018) Prospective aquatic risk assessment for chemical mixtures in agricultural landscapes. Environ Toxicol Chem 37:674–689. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.4049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson AR (2002) Landscape ecotoxicology and assessment of risk at multiple scales. Hum Ecol Risk Assess Int J 8:127–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/20028091056773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson GD, Patil GP (2007) Landscape pattern analysis for assessing ecosystem condition. Springer, US

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan A, Hepcan Ş (2009) An examination of ecological risk assessment at landscape scale and the management plan. In: Illangasekare TH, Mahutova K, Barich JJ (eds) Decision support for natural disasters and intentional threats to water security. Springer, Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 237–251

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kapustka LA, Galbraith H, Luxon M, Yocum J (2001) Using landscape ecology to focus ecological risk assessment and guide risk management decision-making. Toxicol Ind Health 17:236–246. https://doi.org/10.1191/0748233701th121oa

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinmann JU, Wang M (2017) Modeling individual movement decisions of brown hare (Lepus europaeus) as a key concept for realistic spatial behavior and exposure: a population model for landscape-level risk assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem 36:2299–2307. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.3760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leuven R, Poudevigne I (2002) Riverine landscape dynamics and ecological risk assessment. Freshw Biol 47:845–865. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00918.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li P (2020) Meeting the environmental challenges. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 26(9):2303–2315. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2020.1797472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li P, Wu J (2019) Sustainable living with risks: meeting the challenges. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 25(1–2):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2019.1584030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li P, Qian H, Howard KWF, Wu J (2015) Building a new and sustainable “Silk Road economic belt.” Environ Earth Sci 74(10):7267–7270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4739-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li P, Qian H, Zhou W (2017) Finding harmony between the environment and humanity: an introduction to the thematic issue of the Silk Road. Environ Earth Sci 76(3):105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6428-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Wang Y, Xie S, Sun R, Cheng X (2020) Impacts of landscape multifunctionality change on landscape ecological risk in a megacity, China: a case study of Beijing. Ecol Ind 117:106681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin Y, Hu X, Zheng X, Hou X, Zhang Z, Zhou X, Qiu R, Lin J (2019) Spatial variations in the relationships between road network and landscape ecological risks in the highest forest coverage region of China. Ecol Ind 96:392–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu YS, Zhang XP, Li XW, Jay G (2003) Mechanism and regulation of land degradation in Yulin district. J Geog Sci 13(2):217–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu W, Liu J, Kuang W (2020) Spatio–temporal characteristics of soil protection efforts of the Grain for Green Project in northern Shaanxi Province. J Geog Sci 30(3):401–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo F, Liu Y, Peng J, Wu J (2018) Assessing urban landscape ecological risk through an adaptive cycle framework. Landsc Urban Plan 180:125–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallette A, Plummer R, Baird J (2022) Assessing ecological conditions for landscape management: a comparative analysis of field measurements and perceptions. Landsc Res. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2022.2081675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann D, Mangalasseril MA, Rankavat S, Joshi PK (2021) Spatio-temporal variations in landscape ecological risk related to road network in the Central Himalaya. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 27:289–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2019.1710693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marta S, Brunetti M, Manenti R, Provenzale A, Ficetola GF (2021) Climate and land-use changes drive biodiversity turnover in arthropod assemblages over 150 years. Nat Ecol Evol 5:1291–1300. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01513-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Ene E (2012) FRAGSTATS v4: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical and continuous maps. Computer software program produced by the authors at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html. Accessed 5 Apr 2021

  • Mo W, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Zhuang D (2017) Impacts of road network expansion on landscape ecological risk in a megacity, China: a case study of Beijing. Sci Total Environ 574:1000–1011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondal B, Sharma P, Kundu D, Bansal S (2021) Spatio-temporal assessment of landscape ecological risk and associated drivers: a case study of Delhi. Environ Urban ASIA 12:S85–S106. https://doi.org/10.1177/09754253211007830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muradyan VS, Asmaryan ShG (2015) Applying landscape-ecological concept and GIS modelling for assessing and mapping of ecological situation of mountainous landscapes (on the case of Syunik marz, Armenia). Geocarto Int 30:1077–1091. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2015.1013065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newbold T, Hudson LN, Hill SLL, Contu S, Lysenko I, Senior RA, Börger L, Bennett DJ, Choimes A, Collen B, Day J, De Palma A, Díaz S, Echeverria-Londoño S, Edgar MJ, Feldman A, Garon M, Harrison MLK, Alhusseini T, Ingram DJ, Itescu Y, Kattge J, Kemp V, Kirkpatrick L, Kleyer M, Correia DLP, Martin CD, Meiri S, Novosolov M, Pan Y, Phillips HRP, Purves DW, Robinson A, Simpson J, Tuck SL, Weiher E, White HJ, Ewers RM, Mace GM, Scharlemann JPW, Purvis A (2015) Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature 520:45–50. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • (NGCC) National Geomatics Center of China. GlobeLand30 (2021) http://www.globallandcover.com/home_en.html. Accessed 12 Apr 2021

  • Ntshanga NK, Procheş S, Slingsby JA (2021) Assessing the threat of landscape transformation and habitat fragmentation in a global biodiversity hotspot. Austral Ecol 46:1052–1069. https://doi.org/10.1111/aec.13037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Office of Shaanxi Local Gazetteers. 1994. Local gazetteers of Yulin region (2021) http://dfz.shaanxi.gov.cn/sqzlk/xbsxz/sxdyl/yls_16204/yldqz/ (in Chinese). Accessed 12 Apr 2021

  • Ran P, Hu S, Frazier AE, Qu S, Yu D, Tong L (2022) Exploring changes in landscape ecological risk in the Yangtze River Economic Belt from a spatiotemporal perspective. Ecol Ind 137:108744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seitz NE, Westbrook CJ, Dubé MG, Squires AJ (2013) Assessing large spatial scale landscape change effects on water quality and quantity response in the lower Athabasca River basin. Integr Environ Assess Manag 9:392–404. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.1336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semenchuk P, Plutzar C, Kastner T, Matej S, Bidoglio G, Erb K-H, Essl F, Haberl H, Wessely J, Krausmann F, Dullinger S (2022) Relative effects of land conversion and land-use intensity on terrestrial vertebrate diversity. Nat Commun 13:615. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28245-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaanxi Provincial Platform of Common Geospatial Information Services (2021) Atlas of natural resources and environment in Shaanxi Province. http://210.74.129.74:81/sxatlas/SXMAPVIEW_HJ.aspx (in Chinese). Accessed 12 Apr 2021

  • Suter GW, Norton SB (2019) Ecological risk assessment☆. In: Fath B (ed) Encyclopedia of ecology, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 402–406

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tarazona D, Tarazona G, Tarazona J (2021) A simplified population-level landscape model identifying ecological risk drivers of pesticide applications, part one: case study for large herbivorous mammals. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18:7720. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18157720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topping CJ, Dalby L, Skov F (2016) Landscape structure and management alter the outcome of a pesticide ERA: evaluating impacts of endocrine disruption using the ALMaSS European Brown Hare model. Sci Total Environ 541:1477–1488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.10.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Zhang J, Liu J, Wang G, He R, Elmahdi A, Elsawah S (2011) Water resources planning and management based on system dynamics: a case study of Yulin city. Environ Dev Sustain 13(2):331–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang B, Ding M, Li S, Liu L, Ai J (2020) Assessment of landscape ecological risk for a cross–border basin: a case study of the Koshi River Basin, central Himalayas. Ecol Ind 117:106621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Liu X, Zhao C, Chang Y, Liu Y, Zang F (2021a) Spatial–temporal pattern analysis of landscape ecological risk assessment based on land use/land cover change in Baishuijiang national nature reserve in Gansu Province. China Ecological Indicators 124:107454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Xie T, Yu X, Zhang C (2021b) Simulation of soil loss under different climatic conditions and agricultural farming economic benefits: the example of Yulin City on Loess Plateau. Agric Water Manag 244:106462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfram J, Stehle S, Bub S, Petschick LL, Schulz R (2021) Water quality and ecological risks in European surface waters–monitoring improves while water quality decreases. Environ Int 152:106479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank Group (2013) Loess Plateau watershed rehabilitation project. https://projects.worldbank.org/en/projects-operations/project-detail/P003540?lang=en&tab=overview. Accessed 16 Apr 2021

  • Wu J (2007) Landscape ecology: pattern, process, scale and hierarchy, 2nd edn. Higher Education Press, Beijing (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J (2008) Landscape ecology. In: Jørgensen SE, Fath BD (eds) Encyclopedia of ecology. Academic Press, Oxford, pp 2103–2108

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wu W, Chen Z, Li Y, Wang Y, Yan J, Song C (2019) Land engineering and its role for sustainable agriculture in the agro–pastoral ecotone: a case study of Yulin, Shaanxi Province China. J Geogr Sci 29(5):818–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xing L, Hu M, Wang Y (2020) Integrating ecosystem services value and uncertainty into regional ecological risk assessment: a case study of Hubei Province, Central China. Sci Total Environ 740:140126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu XL (2021) China annual vegetation index (NDVI) spatial distribution data set. Data registration and publication system of resource and environmental science data center. Chin Acad Sci. https://doi.org/10.12078/2018060601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu J, Zhao H, Yin P, Wu L, Li G (2019) Landscape ecological quality assessment and its dynamic change in coal mining area: a case study of Peixian. Environ Earth Sci 78(24):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Q, Guo P, Jin M, Qi J (2021a) Multi-scenario landscape ecological risk assessment based on Markov–FLUS composite model. Geomat Nat Haz Risk 12:1449–1466. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2021.1931478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu W, Wang J, Zhang M, Li S (2021b) Construction of landscape ecological network based on landscape ecological risk assessment in a large–scale opencast coal mine area. J Clean Prod 286:125523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan J, Li G, Qi G, Qiao H, Nie Z, Huang C, Kang Y, Sun D, Zhang M, Kang X, Yao X (2021) Landscape ecological risk assessment of farming-pastoral ecotone in China based on terrain gradients. Hum Ecol Risk Assess Int J 27:2124–2141. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2021.1956300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang B, Wang Q, Xu X (2018) Evaluation of soil loss change after Grain for Green Project in the Loss Plateau: a case study of Yulin China. Environ Earth Sci 77(8):304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu H, Liu X, Kong B, Li R, Wang G (2019) Landscape ecology development supported by geospatial technologies: a review. Eco Inform 51:185–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Peng J, Liu Y, Wu J (2017) Coupling ecosystem services supply and human ecological demand to identify landscape ecological security pattern: a case study in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region China. Urban Ecosyst 20(3):701–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Chang WJ, Zhu ZC, Hui Z (2020a) Landscape ecological risk assessment of Chinese coastal cities based on land use change. Appl Geogr 117:102174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Chen C, Wang J, Yang D, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Gao M (2020b) The spatial granularity effect, changing landscape patterns, and suitable landscape metrics in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, 1995–2015. Ecol Ind 114:106259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong Y, Cheng J, Meng L, Zhang W (2020) Ecological vulnerability assessment and cause analysis of the Farming–Pastoral zone in Northern China—taking Yulin City as an example. In: Wang L, Wu Y, Gong J (eds) Proceedings of the 6th China high resolution earth observation conference (CHREOC 2019). Springer, Singapore, pp 157–166

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zurlini G, Rossi O, Ferrarini A, Rossi P, Petrosillo I, Zaccarelli N (2004) Ecological risk assessment through landscape science approaches. In: Teaf CM, Yessekin BK, Khankhasayev MK (eds) Risk assessment as a tool for water resources decision-making in Central Asia. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 155–173

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The editors and reviewers are sincerely acknowledged for their instructive and detailed comments on the early versions of this article.

Funding

The following funding sources supported this research: the Key Laboratory of Degraded and Unused Land Consolidation Engineering of the Ministry of Natural Resources (SXDJ2019–13), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (CHD300102291507), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41971033), the Natural Science Basic Research in Shaanxi Province of China (Program No. 2019JM–512), the Programme of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities (B08039), Fund Project of Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Land Consolidation (2019–JC01).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The study conception was designed by BX and YZ. All authors contributed to the data collection and processing. The calculation and analysis were performed by BX and YZ. The first draft of the manuscript was written by BX. Previous versions of the manuscript were discussed by all authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Bin Xu or Yan Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of a Topical Collection in Environmental Earth Sciences on “Recent Advances in Environmental Sustainability”, Guest edited by Peiyue Li.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, B., Ji, K., Qi, B. et al. Landscape ecological risk assessment of Yulin Region in Shaanxi Province of China. Environ Earth Sci 81, 510 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-022-10636-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-022-10636-x

Keywords

Navigation