Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of different chemical agents in the single extraction of some potentially toxic elements (PTEs) from contaminated soils

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Single-extraction methods are one of the common ways to study the mobility of potentially toxic elements (PTEs) in artificially contaminated soils. The present study was aimed to evaluate the power of eight chemical agents to mobilize five PTEs including cadmium (Cd), cobalt (Co), copper (Cu), nickel (Ni), and zinc (Zn) in 25 soils spiked with two contamination levels (T1 and T2) and the effect of soil properties on PTEs extractable by different extractants using statistical analysis and multivariable regression. Regarding average values of the relative percentage of PTEs extracted of their total amounts in contaminated soils, EDTA was the strongest reagent except for Co, while NaNO3 was the weakest one. pH showed a negative correlation with CaCl2-extractable Cd, Co, Ni, and Zn, DTPA- and EDTA-extractable Ni, HNO3-extractable Cd, Co, Cu, and Zn, MgCl2-, NaNO3-, and NH4NO3-extractable Co, Ni, and Zn, and NH4OAc-extractable Cd, Co, and Zn. Cation exchange capacity (CEC) was negatively significantly correlated with HNO3-extractable Cd, while it had a positive significant correlation with MgCl2-extractable Cd. Organic matter (OM) showed a negative correlation with HNO3-extractable Cd and Zn, whereas it had a positive correlation with NH4NO3-extractable Cu. Equivalent calcium carbonate (ECC) was negatively significantly correlated with CaCl2-extractable Cd, Co, and Ni, EDTA-extractable Co, Cu, Ni, and Zn, HNO3-extractable Cd, Co, Cu, Ni, and Zn, MgCl2- and NaNO3-extractable Zn, NH4NO3-extractable Cd, Co, Ni, and Zn, and NH4OAc-extractable Cd and Co. According to the results, pH and ECC were the most effective parameters among soil properties in multivariable regression equations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adriano DC (2001) Trace elements in the terrestrial environments: biogeochemistry, bioavailability and risks of metals, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin, p 896

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad R, Tehsin Z, Malik ST, Asad SA, Shahrzad M, Bilal M, Shah MM, Khan SA (2016) Phytoremediation potential of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.): identification and characterization of heavy metals responsive genes. Clean Soil Air Water 44:195–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez JM, Lopez-Valdivia LM, Novillo J, Obrador A, Rico MI (2006) Comparison of EDTA and sequential extraction tests for phytoavailability prediction of manganese and zinc in agricultural alkaline soils. Geoderma 132:450–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakircioglu D, Kurtulus YB, İbar H (2011) Comparison of extraction procedures for assessing soil metal bioavailability to wheat grains. Clean Soil Air Water 39(8):728–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behera SK, Singh MV, Singh KN, Todwal S (2011) Distribution variability of total and extractable zinc in cultivated acid soils of India and their relationship with some selected soil properties. Geoderma 162:242–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattani I, Fragoulis G, Boccelli R, Capri E (2006) Copper bioavailability in the rhizosphere of maize (Zea mays L.) grown in two Italian soils. Chemosphere 64:1972–1979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatzistathis T, Alifragis D, Therios I, Dimassi K (2014) Comparison of three micronutrient soil-test extractants in three Greek soil types. Commun Soil Sci Plan 45:381–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derakhshan Nejad Z, Jung MC, Kim KH (2018) Remediation of soils contaminated with heavy metals with an emphasis on immobilization technology. Environ Geochem Health 40:927–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Santiago-Martín A, Valverde-Asenjo I, Quintana JR, González-Huecas C, Lafuente AL (2013) Soil properties affecting metal extractability patterns in periurban calcareous agricultural soils in the Mediterranean area. Int J Environ Res 7:831–840

    Google Scholar 

  • Diarra I, Kotra KK, Prasad S (2021) Assessment of biodegradable chelating agents in the phytoextraction of heavy metals from multi–metal contaminated soil. Chemosphere 273:128483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Laing G, Rinklebe J, Vandecasteele B, Meers E, Tack FMG (2009) Trace metal behaviour in estuarine and riverine floodplain soils and sediments: a review. Sci Total Environ 407:3972–3985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esnaola MV, Bermond A, Millán E (2000) Optimization of DTPA and calcium chloride extractants for assessing extractable metal fraction in polluted soils. Commun Soil Sci Plan 31:13–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gluhar S, Kaurin A, Lestan D (2020) Soil washing with biodegradable chelating agents and EDTA: technological feasibility, remediation efficiency and environmental sustainability. Chemosphere 257:127226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta SK, Aten CC (1993) Comparison and evaluation of extraction media and their suitability in a simple model to predict the biological relevance of heavy metal concentrations in contaminated soils. J Environ Anal Chem 51:25–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta AK, Sinha S (2007) Assessment of single extraction methods for the prediction of bioavailability of metals to Brassica juncea L. Czern. (var. Vaibhav) grown on tannery waste contaminated soil. J Hazard Mater 149:144–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer D, Keller C (2002) Changes in the rhizosphere of metal-accumulating plants evidenced by chemical extractants. J Environ Qual 31:1561–1569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jalali M, Hourseresht Z (2017) Metal Extractability in binary and multi-metals spiked calcareous soils. Commun Soil Sci Plan 48:1089–1104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jalali M, Hurseresht Z (2020) Assessment of mobile and potential mobile trace elements extractability in calcareous soils using different extracting agents. Front Environ Sci Eng 14(1):7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jalali M, Khanlari ZV (2007) Redistribution of fractions of zinc, cadmium, nickel, copper andlead in contaminated calcareous soils treated with EDTA. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 53:519–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabata-Pendias A (2011) Trace element in soils and plants, 4th edn. CRC Press, New York, p 739

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaurin A, Gluhar S, Tilikj N, Lestan D (2020) Soil washing with biodegradable chelating agents and EDTA: effect on soil properties and plant growth. Chemosphere 260:127673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim RY, Yoon JK, Kim TS, Yang JE, Owens G, Kim KR (2015) Bioavailability of heavy metals in soils: definitions and practical implementation—a critical review. Environ Geochem Health 37:1041–1061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Shuman LM (1996) Redistribution of forms of zinc, cadmium and nickel in soils treated with EDTA. Sci Total Environ 191:95–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay WL, Norvell WA (1978) Development of a DTPA test for zinc, iron, manganese and copper. Soil Sci Soc Am J 42:421–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu Y, Gong Z, Zhang G, Burghardt W (2003) Concentration and chemical speciations of Cu, Zn, Pb and Cr of urban soils in Nonjing, China. Geoderma 115:101–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo P, Xiao X, Han X, Ma Y, Sun X, Jiang J, Wang H (2019) Application of different single extraction procedures for assessing the bioavailability of heavy metal(loid)s in soils from overlapped areas of farmland and coal resources. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:14932–14942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makino T, Sugahara K, Sakurai Y, Takano H, Kamiya T, Sasaki K, Itou T, Sekiya N (2006) Remediation of cadmium contamination in paddy soils by washing with chemicals: selection of washing chemicals. Environ Pollut 144:2–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massas I, Ehaliotis C, Gerontidis S, Sarris E (2009) Elevated heavy metal concentrations in top soils of an Aegean island town (Greece): total and available forms, origin and distribution. Environ Monit Assess 151:105–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBride MB, Pitiranggon M, Kim B (2009) A comparison of tests for extractable copper and zinc in metal-spiked and field-contaminated soil. Soil Sci 174:439–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin MJ, Zarcinas BA, Stevens DP, Cook N (2000) Soil testing for heavy metals. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 31:1661–1700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menzies NW, Donn MJ, Kopittke PM (2007) Evaluation of extractants for estimation of the phytoavailable trace metals in soils. Environ Pollut 145:121–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moral R, Gilkes RJ, Moreno-Caselles J (2002) A comparisons of extractants for heavy metals in contaminated soils from Spain. Commun Soil Sci Plan 33:2781–2791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novozamsky I, Lexmond THM, Houba VJGA (1993) Single extraction procedure of soil for evaluation of uptake of some heavy metals by plants. J Environ Anal Chem 51:47–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rékási M, Filep T (2006) Effect of microelement loads on the element fractions of soil and plant uptake. Agrokém Talajt 55(1):213–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims JT, Kline JS (1991) Chemical fractionation and plant uptake of heavy metals in soils amended with co-composed sewage sludge. J Environ Qual 20:387–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soriano-Disla JM, Calupiña-Moya RD, Martínez-Martínez S, Zornoza R, Faz A, Acosta JA (2018) Evaluation of the performance of chemical extractants to mobilise metals for remediation of contaminated samples. J Geochem Explor 193:22–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks DL (1996) Environmental soil chemistry. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sposito G, Lund J, Chang AC (1983) Trace metal chemistry in arid-zone field soils amended with sewage sludge: I. Fractionation of Ni, Cu, Zn, Cd and Pb in solid phases. Soil Sci Soc Am J 46:260–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takáč P, Szabová T, Kozáková Ľ, Benková M (2009) Heavy metals and their bioavailability from soils in the long-term polluted Central Spiš region of SR. Plant Soil Environ 55(4):167–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takeda A, Tsukada H, Takaku Y, Hisamatsu S, Inaba J, Nanzyo M (2006) Extractability of major and trace elements from agricultural soils using chemical extraction methods: application for phytoavailability assessment. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 52:406–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tessier A, Campbell PGC, Bisson M (1979) Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals. Anal Chem 51:844–851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Ranst E, Verloo M, Demeyer A, Pauwels JM (1999) Manual for the soil chemistry and fertility laboratory. In: Communications in Agricultural & Applied Biological Sciences. Ghent University, p 243

  • Van Thinh N, Osanai Y, Adachi T, Voung BTS, Kitano I, Chung NT, Thai PK (2021) Removal of lead and other toxic metals in heavily contaminated soil using biodegradable chelators: GLDA, citric acid and ascorbic acid. Chemosphere 263:127912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Shi L, Zhai L, Zhang H, Wang S, Zou J, Shen Z, Lian C, Chen Y (2021) Analysis of the long-term effectiveness of biochar immobilization remediation on heavy metal contaminated soil and the potential environmental factors weakening the remediation effect: a review. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 207:111261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wear JI, Evans CE (1968) Relationship of zinc uptake by corn and sorghum to soil zinc measured by three extractants. Soil Sci Soc Am J 32:543–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng FR, Ali S, Zhang HT, Ouyang YN, Qiu BY, Wu FB, Zhang GP (2011) The influence of pH and organic matter content in paddy soil on heavy metal availability and their uptake by rice plants. Environ Pollut 159:84–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhai X, Li Z, Huang B, Luo N, Huang M, Zhang Q, Zeng G (2018) Remediation of multiple heavy metal-contaminated soil through the combination of soil washing and in situ immobilization. Sci Total Environ 635:92–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

    Mohsen Jalali & Ziba Hurseresht

  2. Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran

    Faranak Ranjbar

Authors
  1. Mohsen Jalali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ziba Hurseresht
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Faranak Ranjbar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Faranak Ranjbar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work and have no conflicts of interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jalali, M., Hurseresht, Z. & Ranjbar, F. Comparison of different chemical agents in the single extraction of some potentially toxic elements (PTEs) from contaminated soils. Environ Earth Sci 81, 282 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-022-10403-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-022-10403-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation