Abstract
In the development of the prediction model for soil liquefaction, compared to the stress-based method, the energy-based methods proposed and developed in recent years are closer to the essence of soil liquefaction which is about the energy dissipation. Therefore, considering the weak nonlinear relationship found by the previous research, the fuzzy neural network (FNN) and BP neural network (BPNN) were adopted to try to obtain a prediction model which is the most proper to this nonlinear relationship. Firstly, the database including 284 cases obtained from laboratory test was divided into 3 separate groups denoted as training, validation set and testing sets by the ratio of 5:1:1; then, the FNN model and BPNN model were iterated to determine the model parameter by referring to the variation of fitness value and relative error of validation set; at the same time, the optimization algorithm of genetic algorithm (GA) was adopted to BPNN to find the best coefficients; besides, the parameter of \({C}_{c}\) and \({D}_{50}\) was respectively excluded from the database to test their influence degree according to the prediction error; finally, six prediction results of FNN and genetic algorithm BP neural network (GABP) were compared with the previously proposed models. The results showed that the relationship of capacity energy to the influencing parameters could not be fitted as a fully linear relationship; the FNN model can learn the role of \({C}_{c}\) in affecting the capacity energy while the GABP model needs not to take it into account; the FNN and GABP model all fitted a good weakly nonlinear relationship for the capacity energy, and the GABP model is a better prediction model for capacity energy so far.











Availability of data and material
Not applicable.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Alavi AH, Gandomi AH (2012) Energy-based numerical models for assessment of soil liquefaction. Geosci Front 3:541–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2011.12.008
Asvar F, Shirmohammadi A, Barkhordari Bafghi K (2018) Predicting potential of blast-induced soil liquefaction using neural networks and neuro-fuzzy system. Sci Iran 25:617–631. https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2017.4184
Azeiteiro RJN, Coelho PALF, Taborda DMG, Grazina JCD (2017) Energy-based evaluation of liquefaction potential under non-uniform cyclic loading. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 92:650–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.11.005
Baziar MH, Jafarian Y (2007) Assessment of liquefaction triggering using strain energy concept and ANN model: capacity energy. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 27:1056–1072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.03.007
Baziar MH, Jafarian Y, Shahnazari H et al (2011) Prediction of strain energy-based liquefaction resistance of sand-silt mixtures: an evolutionary approach. Comput Geosci 37:1883–1893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2011.04.008
Cabalar AF, Cevik A, Gokceoglu C (2012) Some applications of Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) in geotechnical engineering. Comput Geotech 40:14–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2011.09.008
Chen YR, Chen JW, Hsieh SC, Chang YT (2013) Evaluation of soil liquefaction potential based on the nonlinear energy dissipation principles. J Earthq Eng 17:54–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2012.691256
Das SK, Mohanty R, Mohanty M, Mahamaya M (2020) Multi-objective feature selection (MOFS) algorithms for prediction of liquefaction susceptibility of soil based on in situ test methods. Nat Hazards 103:2371–2393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04089-3
Dief HM, Figueroa JL (2007) Liquefaction assessment by the unit energy concept through centrifuge and torsional shear tests. Can Geotech J 44:1286–1297. https://doi.org/10.1139/T07-059
Ghani S, Kumari S, Bardhan A (2021) A novel liquefaction study for fine-grained soil using PCA-based hybrid soft computing models. Sadhana-Acad Proc Eng Sci 46:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-021-01640-1
Ghorbani A, Eslami A (2021) Energy-based model for predicting liquefaction potential of sandy soils using evolutionary polynomial regression method. Comput Geotech 129:103867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103867
Green RA (2001) Energy-based evaluation and remediation of lique- fiable soils. Ph.D. dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA
Jafariavval Y, Derakhshani A (2020) New formulae for capacity energy-based assessment of liquefaction triggering. Mar Georesour Geotechnol 38:214–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119X.2019.1566297
Javdanian H (2019) Evaluation of soil liquefaction potential using energy approach: experimental and statistical investigation. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78:1697–1708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-017-1201-6
Ke X, Chen J, Pan W, Shan Y (2020) An energy-based process evaluation for low-plasticity fine-grained soil during cyclic loading. Geo-Congress 2020 GSP 318:289–298
Kokusho T (2013) Liquefaction potential evaluations: Energy-based method versus stress-based method. Can Geotech J 50:1088–1099. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2012-0456
Kokusho T (2017) Liquefaction potential evaluations by energy-based method and stress-based method for various ground motions: supplement. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 95:40–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.01.033
Leng X, Jiang H, Zou X, Zeng X (2019) Motion feature quantization of athletic sports training based on fuzzy neural network theory. Cluster Comput 22:4631–4638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-018-2231-y
Millen MDL, Rios S, Quintero J, Viana da Fonseca A (2020) Prediction of time of liquefaction using kinetic and strain energy. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 128:105898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105898
Ni X, Ye B, Cheng Z, Ye G (2020) Evaluation of the effects of initial deviatoric stress and cyclic stress amplitude on liquefaction potential of loose and medium-dense sands: an energy-based method. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 136:106236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106236
Pham TA (2021) Application of feedforward neural network and SPT results in the estimation of seismic soil liquefaction triggering. Comput Intell Neurosci 2021:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1058825
Pirhadi N, Tang X, Yang Q, Kang F (2018) A new equation to evaluate liquefaction triggering using the response surface method and parametric sensitivity analysis. Sustain. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010112
Pirhadi N, Tang X, Yang Q (2019) Energy evaluation of triggering soil liquefaction based on the response surface method. Appl Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9040694
Rahbarzare A, Azadi M (2019) Improving prediction of soil liquefaction using hybrid optimization algorithms and a fuzzy support vector machine. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78:4977–4987. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-01445-3
Samui P, Kim D, Hariharan R (2015) Determination of seismic liquefaction potential of soil based on strain energy concept. Environ Earth Sci 74:5581–5585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4567-4
Sassa S, Takagawa T (2018) Liquefied gravity flow-induced tsunami : first evidence and comparison from the 2018 Indonesia Sulawesi earthquake and tsunami disasters. Landslides. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-018-1114-x
Sonmezer YB (2019) Energy-based evaluation of liquefaction potential of uniform sands. Geomech Eng 17:145–156. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2019.17.2.145
Towhata I (2008) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Springer, Berlin and Heidelberg, Germany
Towhata I, Ishihara K (1985) Shear work and pore water pressure in undrained shear. Soils Found 25:73–84
Tsaparli V, Kontoe S, Taborda DMG, Potts DM (2017) An energy-based interpretation of sand liquefaction due to vertical ground motion. Comput Geotech 90:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2017.05.006
Xue X, Yang X (2013) Application of the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for prediction of soil liquefaction. Nat Hazards 67:901–917. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0615-0
Zhang J, Wang Y (2020) An ensemble method to improve prediction of earthquake-induced soil liquefaction: a multi-dataset study. Neural Comput Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05084-2
Zhang W, Goh ATC, Zhang Y et al (2015) Assessment of soil liquefaction based on capacity energy concept and multivariate adaptive regression splines. Eng Geol 188:29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.01.009
Zhao Z, Duan W, Cai G (2021) A novel PSO-KELM based soil liquefaction potential evaluation system using CPT and Vs measurements. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 150:106930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106930
Funding
There is no funding to support this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and the first draft were finished by YZ; W-HC proposed the idea of this research and calibrated the model parameter; Mahmood Ahmad provided the advice about the AI technology, and revised the first draft. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, Y., Chu, WH. & Ahmad, M. The establishment of prediction model for soil liquefaction based on the seismic energy using the neural network. Environ Earth Sci 81, 114 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-022-10263-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-022-10263-6