Abstract
Sulfentrazone is an important herbicide in the management of weeds that are difficult to control in crops such as soybeans and sugarcane. With the increase in cases of herbicide-resistant weeds, the trend is that pre-emergence application of sulfentrazone will be more widespread in the coming years. This may result in a greater likelihood of contamination of subsurface waters. Thus, it is essential to understand sulfentrazone leaching, considering the chemical, physical and structural heterogeneity that exists along the soil profile to estimate the potential for contamination of this herbicide in the soil more accurately. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate sulfentrazone leaching in horizons A, B, and C as well as their mixtures, AB and ABC, in an Ultisol and an Oxisol. The test was performed using 50-cm columns containing the soil horizons subjected to 60 mm of precipitation. Sulfentrazone leaching presented the following increasing order in Ultisol: A < AB < ABC < B < C, and in the Oxisol, it was A < ABC < AB < C < B. Therefore, sulfentrazone leaching occurs heterogeneously in Ultisol and Oxisol profiles and the influence of the horizons on sulfentrazone leaching is different between soils since they have different natures from their formation. Furthermore, sulfentrazone leaching is facilitated in the deeper horizons of both soils, which increases the potential for groundwater contamination when this herbicide exceeds the first 10 cm of the soil surface.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Alletto L, Coquet Y, Benoit P et al (2010) Tillage management effects on pesticide fate in soils. A Review. Agron Sustain Dev 30:367–400
Andrade SRB, Silva AA, Queiroz MELR et al (2010) Sorção e dessorção do ametryn em argissolo vermelho-amarelo e latossolo vermelho-amarelo com diferentes valores de PH. Planta Daninha 28:177–184
ANVISA (2003) Ministério da Saúde-MS Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária-ANVISA
Biondino D, Borrelli L, Critelli S et al (2020) A multidisciplinary approach to investigate weathering processes affecting gneissic rocks (Calabria, southern Italy). CATENA 187:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2019.104372
Braga DF, Freitas FCL, Rocha PRR et al (2016) Leaching of sulfentrazone in soils from the sugarcane region in the northeast region of Brazil. Planta Daninha 34:161–169. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582016340100017
Costa AIG, Queiroz MELR, Neves AA et al (2015) Mobility and persistence of the herbicide fomesafen in soils cultivated with bean plants using SLE/LTP and HPLC/DAD. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:3457–3466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3557-5
Deere DU, Patton FD (1971) Slope Stability in Residual Soils. In: Proceedings of the 4th Pan American Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. San Juan, Puerto Rico. pp 87–170
Delle Site A (2001) Factors affecting sorption of organic compounds in natural sorbent / water systems and sorption coefficients for selected pollutants. a review. J Phys Chem Ref Data 30:187–439
Embrapa (2017) Manual de Métodos de Análise de Solo, 3rd edn.
European Weed Research Council (1964) EWRC - Notes and News. Weed Res 4:88–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.1964.tb00275.x
FAOSTAT (2017) FAOSTAT. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/EP. Accessed 4 May 2020
Faustino LA, Freitas MAM, Passos ABRJ et al (2015) Mobilidade do sulfentrazone em solos com diferentes características físicas e químicas. Planta Daninha 33:795–802. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582015000400018
INMETRO (2016) Coordenação Geral de Acreditação ORIENTAÇÃO SOBRE VALIDAÇÃO DE MÉTODOS ANALÍTICOS
Korres NE, Norsworthy JK, Mauromoustakos A (2019) Effects of palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) establishment time and distance from the crop row on biological and phenological characteristics of the weed: implications on soybean yield. Weed Sci 67:126–135. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2018.84
Langaro AC, Barros JPA, Souza MF et al (2019) Estimation of sulfentrazone leaching in isolated application and in mixture with glyphosate. Planta Daninha. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582019370100017
Langaro AC (2018) Sorção e lixiviação do sulfentrazone em latossolo vermelho-amarelo aplicado de forma isolada e em mistura com formulações de glyphosate. Universidade Federal de Viçosa
Madalão JC, Silva AA, Faria AT et al (2019) Leaching and persistence of sulfentrazone when mixed with adjuvants. Planta Daninha. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582019370100088
MAPA (2020) Ministério da Agricultura Pecuária e Abastecimento. http://agrofit.agricultura.gov.br/agrofit_cons/principal_agrofit_cons. Accessed 11 Jun 2019
Martins EC, Melo VF, Abate G (2019) Sorption and desorption of diuron on Typic Argiudoll, Oxic Argiudoll and on their clay fractions: environmental aspects. J Environ Sci Heal Part B Pestic Food Contam Agric Wastes. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2019.1655376
Melo CAD, Medeiros WN, Tuffi Santos LD et al (2010) Lixiviação de sulfentrazone, isoxaflutole e oxyfluorfen no perfil de três solos1. Planta Daninha 28:385–392. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582010000200018
Miltner A, Bombach P, Schimdt-Brücken B, Kästner M (2012) SOM genesis: microbial biomass as a significant source. Biogeochemistry 111:41–55
Monquero PA, Silva PV, Silva Hirata AC et al (2010) Lixiviação e persistência dos herbicidas sulfentrazone e imazapic. Planta Daninha 28:185–195. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582010000100022
Passos ABRJ, Freitas MAM, Gonçalves VA et al (2015) Leaching of sulfentrazone in soils of reforestation in Brazil. Environ Earth Sci 74:1211–1215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4110-7
Ribani M, Bottoli CBG, Collins CH et al (2004) Validação em métodos cromatográficos e eletroforéticos. Quim Nova 27:771–780. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-40422004000500017
USEPA (2009) USEPA - United States Environmental Protection Agency - office of prevention, pesticides and toxic substances
Vermeire M-L, Cornélis J-T, Van Ranst E et al (2018) Soil microbial populations shift as processes protecting organic matter change during podzolization. Front Environ Sci 6:1–16
Weber JB, Mahnken GE, Swain LR (1999) Evaporative effects on mobility OF 14C-labeled triasulfuron and chlorsulfuron in soilS. Soil Sci 164:414–427
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the FAPEMIG, CNPq, and CAPES. This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Brasil (CAPES), Finance Code 001.
Funding
CNPq and CAPES financed the research with scholarship and in the writing of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
LHBJ conducted the research and wrote much of the manuscript; EMGS assisted in the interpretation of the data and in the writing of the manuscript; ACMA assisted in the interpretation of the data and in the writing of the manuscript; PSRS assisted in the evaluation of the experiment and corrected the writing of the manuscript; DFP assisted in the evaluation of the experiment and corrected the writing of the manuscript; AAS was the research advisor and corrected the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Appendix 1
Chemical structure of sulfentrazone in two (A) and three (B) dimensions. Source: Chemicalize.
Appendix 2
Percentage of similarity between the variables: sorghum intoxication at 7 (INT 7) and 14 (INT 14) days after emergence, shoot (SDM), root (RDM) and total (TDM) dry matter in Ultisol horizons.
Appendix 3
Percentage of similarity between the variables: sorghum intoxication at 7 (INT 7) and 14 (INT 14) days after emergence, shoot (SDM), root (RDM) and total (TDM) dry matter in Oxisol horizons.
Appendix 4
Photograph of sorghum plants 14 days after emergence treated with sulfentrazone (1000 g ha−1) in horizons A, B, C, AB and ABC of a Ultisol.
Appendix 5
Photograph of sorghum plants 14 days after emergence, treated with sulfentrazone (1000 g ha−1) in horizons A, B, C, AB and ABC of an Oxisol.
Appendix 6
Chromatograms extracted from the matrix of horizons A, B, C, AB and ABC of a Ultisol, with (black line) and without (red line) the presence of sulfentrazone at a concentration of 1 mg L−1, at a retention time (tR) of 8.4 min.
Appendix 7
Chromatograms extracted from the matrix of horizons A, B, C, AB and ABC of an Oxisol, with (black line) and without (red line) the presence of sulfentrazone at a concentration of 1 mg L−1, at a retention time (tR) of 8.4 min.
Appendix 8
Analytical curves with matrix overlapping of horizons A, B, C, AB and ABC of a Ultisol.
Appendix 9
Analytical curves with matrix overlapping of horizons A, B, C, AB and ABC of an Oxisol.
Appendix 10
Dispersion of the regression residuals of the analytical response as a function of the concentration of sulfentrazone applied to horizons A, B, C, AB and ABC of a Ultisol.
Appendix 11
Dispersion of the regression residuals of the analytical response as a function of the concentration of sulfentrazone applied to horizons A, B, C, AB and ABC of an Oxisol.
Appendix 12
Detection (DL) and quantification limits (QL) of the sulfentrazone extraction method in horizons A, B, C, AB and ABC of a Ultisol and an Oxisol.
Soil | Horizons | DL (mg kg−1) | QL (mg kg−1) |
---|---|---|---|
Ultisol | A | 0.0036 | 0.0118 |
B | 0.0028 | 0.0093 | |
C | 0.0029 | 0.0095 | |
AB | 0.0146 | 0.0482 | |
ABC | 0.0006 | 0.0020 | |
Oxisol | A | 0.0066 | 0.0219 |
B | 0.0184 | 0.0607 | |
C | 0.0252 | 0.0830 | |
AB | 0.0225 | 0.0743 | |
ABC | 0.0210 | 0.0692 |
Appendix 13
Recovery percentage (%R) obtained by the analysis of extracts from horizons A, B, C, AB and ABC of a Ultisol and an Oxisol, fortified at three concentration levels of sulfentrazone.
Theoretical concentration (mg kg−1) | Real concentration (Average) (mg kg−1) | % R |
---|---|---|
Ultisol—horizon A | ||
0.2 | 0.14 | 71.09 |
0.6 | 0.68 | 113.02 |
1.0 | 1.01 | 101.44 |
Ultisol—horizon B | ||
0.2 | 0.14 | 71.02 |
0.6 | 0.65 | 108.03 |
1.0 | 0.93 | 92.87 |
Ultisol—horizon C | ||
0.2 | 0.14 | 71.12 |
0.6 | 0.66 | 109.61 |
1.0 | 0.95 | 94.76 |
Ultisol—horizon AB | ||
0.2 | 0.16 | 81.39 |
0.6 | 0.62 | 103.65 |
1.0 | 0.90 | 90.21 |
Ultisol—horizon ABC | ||
0.2 | 0.15 | 75.86 |
0.6 | 0.66 | 109.76 |
1.0 | 0.94 | 94.31 |
Oxisol—horizon A | ||
0.2 | 0.18 | 91.31 |
0.6 | 0.61 | 102.31 |
1.0 | 0.98 | 98.08 |
Oxisol—horizon B | ||
0.2 | 0.21 | 105.60 |
0.6 | 0.69 | 114.37 |
1.0 | 0.99 | 99.32 |
Oxisol—horizon C | ||
0.2 | 0.21 | 102.97 |
0.6 | 0.60 | 99.48 |
1.0 | 0.94 | 93.70 |
Oxisol—horizon AB | ||
0.2 | 0.22 | 108.14 |
0.6 | 0.63 | 105.06 |
1.0 | 0.86 | 85.79 |
Oxisol—horizon ABC | ||
0.2 | 0.19 | 95.24 |
0.6 | 0.56 | 94.09 |
1.0 | 0.86 | 85.80 |
Appendix 14
Average concentration and variation coefficient (VC) obtained from extraction in horizons A, B, C, AB and ABC of a Ultisol and an Oxisol, fortified at three concentration levels of sulfentrazone in three replicates.
Theoretical concentration (mg kg−1) | Real concentration (Average) (mg kg−1) | VC (%) |
---|---|---|
Ultisol—horizon A | ||
0.2 | 0.13 | 9.09 |
0.6 | 0.68 | 5.88 |
1.0 | 1.01 | 0.67 |
Ultisol—horizon B | ||
0.2 | 0.14 | 15.04 |
0.6 | 0.65 | 8.59 |
1.0 | 0.93 | 5.50 |
Ultisol—horizon C | ||
0.2 | 0.14 | 9.49 |
0.6 | 0.66 | 2.49 |
1.0 | 0.95 | 3.11 |
Ultisol—horizon AB | ||
0.2 | 0.16 | 13.50 |
0.6 | 0.62 | 8.05 |
1.0 | 0.90 | 9.61 |
Ultisol—horizon ABC | ||
0.2 | 0.15 | 5.88 |
0.6 | 0.66 | 7.06 |
1.0 | 0.94 | 2.95 |
Oxisol—horizon A | ||
0.2 | 0.18 | 2.90 |
0.6 | 0.61 | 5.60 |
1.0 | 0.98 | 6.40 |
Oxisol—horizon B | ||
0.2 | 0.21 | 3.86 |
0.6 | 0.69 | 6.29 |
1.0 | 0.99 | 11.31 |
Oxisol—horizon C | ||
0.2 | 0.21 | 4.27 |
0.6 | 0.60 | 6.06 |
1.0 | 0.94 | 14.32 |
Oxisol—horizon AB | ||
0.2 | 0.22 | 5.89 |
0.6 | 0.63 | 5.63 |
1.0 | 0.86 | 2.47 |
Oxisol—horizon ABC | ||
0.2 | 0.19 | 3.68 |
0.6 | 0.56 | 1.97 |
1.0 | 0.86 | 2.20 |
Appendix 15
Average concentration and variation coefficient (VC) obtained from extraction in horizons A, B, C, AB and ABC of a Ultisol and an Oxisol, fortified at three concentration levels of sulfentrazone in three replicates, for the different days of analysis.
Theoretical concentration (mg kg−1) | Real concentration (mg kg−1) | Average (mg kg−1) | VC (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 1 | Day 2 | Day 3 | |||
Ultisol—horizon A | |||||
0.2 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.15 | 16.47 |
0.6 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 4.55 |
1.0 | 1.01 | 1.26 | 1.27 | 1.18 | 13.85 |
Ultisol—horizon B | |||||
0.2 | 0.14 | 0.18 | 0.19 | 0.17 | 19.24 |
0.6 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 7.88 |
1.0 | 0.93 | 1.07 | 1.07 | 1.02 | 8.86 |
Ultisol—horizon C | |||||
0.2 | 0.16 | 0.20 | 0.21 | 0.19 | 13.97 |
0.6 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 3.38 |
1.0 | 0.95 | 1.06 | 1.08 | 1.03 | 6.62 |
Ultisol—horizon AB | |||||
0.2 | 0.16 | 0.19 | 0.20 | 0.18 | 13.19 |
0.6 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 6.52 |
1.0 | 0.90 | 1.03 | 1.04 | 0.99 | 8.99 |
Ultisol—horizon ABC | |||||
0.2 | 0.17 | 0.21 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 17.25 |
0.6 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 5.25 |
1.0 | 0.94 | 1.11 | 1.06 | 1.04 | 7.67 |
Oxisol—horizon A | |||||
0.2 | 0.18 | 0.24 | 0.21 | 0.21 | 16.19 |
0.6 | 0.61 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 5.96 |
1.0 | 0.98 | 1.12 | 1.09 | 1.06 | 9.20 |
Oxisol—horizon B | |||||
0.2 | 0.21 | 0.24 | 0.25 | 0.23 | 8.37 |
0.6 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 6.02 |
1.0 | 0.99 | 1.13 | 1.15 | 1.09 | 11.29 |
Oxisol—horizon C | |||||
0.2 | 0.21 | 0.24 | 0.26 | 0.23 | 11.07 |
0.6 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.61 | 0.60 | 5.48 |
1.0 | 0.94 | 1.05 | 1.07 | 1.02 | 14.15 |
Oxisol—horizon AB | |||||
0.2 | 0.22 | 0.26 | 0.27 | 0.25 | 16.02 |
0.6 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 4.65 |
1.0 | 0.86 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.94 | 6.88 |
Oxisol—horizon ABC | |||||
0.2 | 0.19 | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.20 | 6.54 |
0.6 | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.57 | 2.55 |
1.0 | 0.86 | 0.83 | 0.87 | 0.85 | 2.20 |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Júnior, L.H.B., da Silva, E.M.G., de Aguiar, A.C.M. et al. Sulfentrazone mobility in columns filled with ultisol and oxisol horizons. Environ Earth Sci 81, 101 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-10165-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-10165-z