Skip to main content

Variability in groundwater flow and chemistry in the Mekong River alluvial aquifer (Thailand): implications for arsenic and manganese occurrence

Abstract

Arsenic (As) is widespread in alluvial aquifers along rivers draining the Himalayas but has received little attention along the Mekong River upstream of its delta. This study investigates linkages among groundwater recharge, flow, chemistry, and river stage at two sites along the Mekong River in northeast Thailand. Hydraulic head and chemistry were monitored in January and June 2014. In addition, hydraulic head and electrical conductivity were continuously logged at one site from January 2014 to March 2015. During the dry season, groundwater tends to flow toward the river, and saline water from shallow evaporites can intrude the alluvial aquifer. As stage rises, hydraulic-gradient reversals can result in groundwater-river water mixing, thereby promoting geochemical disequilibrium. Groundwater chemistry reflects silicate, carbonate, and evaporite weathering; multiple redox reactions; and spatial and temporal variability in recharge. Concentrations of As and manganese (Mn) in groundwater exceeded drinking-water guidelines by as much as an order of magnitude. Results suggest As is mobilized in groundwater by reduction of ferric (oxyhydr)oxides, consistent with the findings elsewhere in South and Southeast Asia. Upwelling of saline water can increase the solubility of (oxyhydr)oxide phases that sequester Mn and As, can complex Mn and can mobilize adsorbed As oxyanions. Conversely, influxes of oxic river water could promote (oxyhydr)oxide precipitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Availability of data and material

Datalogger measurements are available at https://doi.org/10.4211/52abfd80ae794c0588d133897dcfafa3 (CUAHSI Hydroshare). Other data generated as part of this study are available from the authors upon request.

Code availability

Software used in this study is publicly available (US Geological Survey 2018, 2020).

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the National Research Council of Thailand for permission to conduct this project (# 2774); staff of the Groundwater Resources Institute at Khon Kaen University for logistical support; land owners at the study sites for access; the Mekong River Commission and Thai Meteorological Department for data; Joshua Benton for drafting Fig. 1; and the journal reviewers for their constructive suggestions, which improved the manuscript.

Funding

The authors acknowledge the U.S. National Science Foundation (grants IIA-1338204 and IIA-1338213) and Khon Kaen University for funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan E. Fryar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report no potential conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

12665_2021_9522_MOESM1_ESM.docx

Supplementary file1 Fig. S1. Mekong River stage at Vientiane (VI) and daily rainfall at Sri Chiang Mai (SCM) and Tha Bo (TB) for calendar year 2014. Rainfall data were not available for November–December 2014 at SCM. Stars denote sampling periods (DOCX 59 KB)

12665_2021_9522_MOESM2_ESM.docx

Supplementary file2 Fig. S2. Mekong River stage and daily rainfall at Nakhon Phanom (NP) and Mukdahan (MUK) for January 2014–March 2015 (DOCX 64 KB)

12665_2021_9522_MOESM3_ESM.docx

Supplementary file3 Fig. S3. Plot of SC vs. pH; rectangular outlines denote transects at Sri Chiang Mai site (SCM) and well nests at That Phanom (TP). Dashed circles represent spatial outliers (PN3/21 and PN4/21) (DOCX 48 KB)

12665_2021_9522_MOESM4_ESM.tif

Supplementary file4 Fig. S4. Piper plot showing major-ion compositions. Red and blue denote water samples collected in January and June 2014, respectively. Symbols: triangle = Sri Chiang Mai site groundwater; clover = That Phanom groundwater; square = Sri Chiang Mai river water; circle = That Phanom river water (TIF 3940 KB)

12665_2021_9522_MOESM5_ESM.docx

Supplementary file5 Fig. S5. Mean and median monthly values (1968–2015) of δ18O and δ2H for Bangkok GNIP samples (IAEA/WMO 2020) (DOCX 63 KB)

12665_2021_9522_MOESM6_ESM.pdf

Supplementary file6 Table S1. Location, completion information, and hydraulic head for wells monitored in this study. Table S2. Calculated saturation indices for phases that may control groundwater chemistry and charge balance error. Table S3. Proportions of upgradient groundwater (from TW-2 or OW-17) and Mekong River water in wells OW-22 and OW-37 at Sri Chiang Mai based on isotope end-member mixing calculations (PDF 298 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fryar, A.E., Schreiber, M.E., Pholkern, K. et al. Variability in groundwater flow and chemistry in the Mekong River alluvial aquifer (Thailand): implications for arsenic and manganese occurrence. Environ Earth Sci 80, 225 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09522-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09522-9

Keywords

  • Arsenic
  • Groundwater
  • Mekong River
  • Salinization
  • Thailand