Skip to main content
Log in

A computational model for estimation of 226Ra and 228Ra concentrations in sludge from petrol exploitation, based on radiation-level measurements on stored packages

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the context of the naturally occurring radioactive material associated with petrol exploitation, it is important to determine the concentrations of 226Ra and 228Ra in contaminated sludge originated from this activity and stored in packages. Although measurements based on chemical analyses of samples from package content can be done, difficulties associated with the collection and analyses of samples may be avoided by employing theoretical models based on the emitting radiation levels from the mentioned packages. This article presents a methodology to estimate 226Ra and 228Ra concentrations in sludge stored in cylindrical drums, employing a model developed in the Mathematica software. The model takes into consideration the radiation levels measured at one meter from the top surface of the waste package containing the contaminated sludge. It also takes into consideration packaging dimensions, waste density, time of measurement, among other factors, and allows the determination of all radionuclides concentrations in the sludge, helping to minimize the costs associated with sampling and analyses. Moreover, this proposed model is an alternative solution to pre-existing methods and can also assist operators, regulators, and decision-makers in the prediction of short- and long-term radiological impacts on human beings and on the environment, due to the disposal of waste containing naturally occurring radioactive materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdel-Sabour M (2015) NORM in waste derived from oil and gas production. Middle east waste management summit. Promedia International Limited, Cairo, p 25

    Google Scholar 

  • Agbalagba EO, Avwiri GO, Ononugbo CP (2013) Activity concentration and radiological impact assessment of 226Ra, 228Ra and 40K in drinking waters from (OML) 30, 58 and 61 oil fields and host communities in Niger Delta region of Nigeria. J Environ Radioact 116:197–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2012.08.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attallah MF, Awwad NS, Aly HF (2012) Environmental radioactivity of TE-NORM waste produced from petroleum industry in Egypt: review on characterization and treatment. Natural Gas–Extraction to End Use. IntechOpen, London. https://doi.org/10.5772/CHAPTERDOI

  • Babatunde BB, Sikoki FD, Avwiri GO, Chad-Umoreh YE (2019) Review of the status of radioactivity profile in the oil and gas producing areas of the Niger delta region of Nigeria. J Environ Radioact 202:66–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.01.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bé M, Chisté V, Dulieu C, Browne E, Chechev V, Kuzmenko N, Kondev F, Luca A, Galan M, Pierce A, Huang X (2008) Table of Radionuclides (Vol. 4–A = 133 to 252). Bureau Internationaldes Poids et Mesures, Sèvres, França.

  • Bé M-M, Chisté V, Dulieu C, Mougeot X, Browne E, Chechev V, Kuzmenko N, Kondev F, Luca A, Galan M, Nichols A, Arinc A, Huang X (2010) Table of Radionuclides (Vol. 5–A = 22 to 244). Bureau International des Poids et Mesures, Sèvres, França.

  • Bonczyk M, Samolej K (2019) Testing of the radon tightness of beakers and different types of sealing used in gamma-ray spectrometry for 226Ra concentration determination in NORM. J Environ Radioact 205:55–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czolowski ED, Santoro RL, Srebotnjak T, Shonkoff SBC (2017) Environmental health perspectives–toward consistent methodology to quantify populations in proximity to oil and gas development: a national spatial analysis and review. Environ Health Perspect 125:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP1535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diyashev RN, Takhautdinov SF, Antonov GP, Diyashev IR, Zaitsev VI (1994) Disposal of naturally occurring radioactive materials in oil production. SPE health, safety and environment in oil and gas exploration and production. SPE-Society of Petroleum Engineers, London, p 11

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA (1993) Diffuse norm wastes-waste characterization and perliminary risk assessment. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA (2016) TENORM: Oil and Gas Production Wastes. In: United States Environ. Prot. Agency. https://www.epa.gov/radiation/tenorm-oil-and-gas-production-wastes. Accessed 21 Jun 2018.

  • Oil Industry International Exploration and Production Forum (1988) Low specific activity scale: origin, treatment and disposal. Report No. 6.6/127. International Association of Oil & Gas Producers (OGP), London

  • Godoy JM, da Cruz RP (2003) 226Ra and 228Ra in scale and sludge samples and their correlation with the chemical composition. J Environ Radioact 70:199–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0265-931X(03)00104-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grung M, Ruus A, Holth TF, Sidhu RS, Eriksen DØ, Hylland K (2009) Bioaccumulation and lack of oxidative stress response in the ragworm H. diversicolor following exposure to 226Ra in sediment. J Environ Radioact 100:429–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2009.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamlat MS, Djeffal S, Kadi H (2001) Assessment of radiation exposures from naturally occurring radioactive materials in the oil and gas industry. Appl Radiat Isot 55:141–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-8043(01)00042-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilbron PFL, Xavier AM, Guerrero JP, Pontedeiro EM, Alves RN (2002) Development of a model to determine transport indexes and labelling for uranium and thorium ores or concentrates consignments. Int J Radioact Mater Transp 13:101–109. https://doi.org/10.1179/rmt.2002.13.2.101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilal MA, Attallah MF, Mohamed GY, Fayez-Hassan M (2014) Evaluation of radiation hazard potential of TENORM waste from oil and natural gas production. J Environ Radioact 136:121–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2014.05.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland B (1998). Experience with operations involving NORM in the United Kingdom (UK) and some other regions. Report of the RCA Expert Advisory Group Meeting to review and develop radiation protection guidance for naturally occurring radioactive materials in the oil and gas and other mineral extraction and processing industries. Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Lucas heights, Sydney, 16–20 March.

  • Hrichi H, Baccouche S, Belgaied JE (2013) Evaluation of radiological impacts of tenorm in the Tunisian petroleum industry. J Environ Radioact 115:107–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2012.07.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwaoka K, Yonehara H (2012) Database of the radioactivity of norm used as industrial raw materials. Radiat Prot Dosim 152:444–449. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncs067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia G, Jia J (2012) Determination of radium isotopes in environmental samples by gamma spectrometry, liquid scintillation counting and alpha spectrometry: a review of analytical methodology. J Environ Radioact 106:98–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2011.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston JE, Lim E, Roh H (2019) Impact of upstream oil extraction and environmental public health: a review of the evidence. Sci Total Environ 657:187–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2018.11.483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landsberger S, Brabec C, Canion B, Hashem J, Lu C, Millsap D, George G (2013) Determination of 226Ra, 228Ra and 210Pb in NORM products from oil and gas exploration: problems in activity underestimation due to the presence of metals and self-absorption of photons. J Environ Radioact 125:23–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2013.02.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luttrell WE, Jederberg WW, Still KR (2008) Toxicology principles for the industrial hygienist. The American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA), Fairfax

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Matta LE, Godoy JM, Reis MC (2002) 226Ra, 228Ra and 228Th in scale and sludge samples from the Campos Basin oilfield E&P activities. Radiat Prot Dosim 102:175–178. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohamad Puad HA, Muhd Noor MY (2004) Behaviors of 323Th, 238U, 228Ra and 226Ra on combustion of crude oil terminal sludge. J Environ Radioact 73:289–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2003.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nabhani AL, Khan F, Yang M (2016) Scenario-based risk assessment of TENORM waste disposal options in oil and gas industry. J Loss Prev Process Ind 40:55–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2015.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsvik PA, Berntssen MHG, Hylland K, Eriksen DØ, Holen E (2012) Low impact of exposure to environmentally relevant doses of 226Ra in Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) embryonic cells. J Environ Radioact 109:84–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2012.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omar M, Ali HM, Abu MP, Kontol KM, Ahmad Z, Ahmad SHSS, Sulaiman I, Hamzah R (2004) Distribution of radium in oil and gas industry wastes from Malaysia. Appl Radiat Isot 60:779–782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2004.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paranhos Gazineu MH, De Araújo AA, Brandão YB, Hazin CA, Godoy JMO (2005) Radioactivity concentration in liquid and solid phases of scale and sludge generated in the petroleum industry. J Environ Radioact 81:47–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2004.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parmaksiz A, Ağuş Y, Bulgurlu F, Bulur E, Öncü T, Özkök YÖ (2015) Measurement of enhanced radium isotopes in oil production wastes in Turkey. J Environ Radioact 141:82–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2014.12.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paschoa AS. (1997). NORM and the Brazilian non-nuclear industries. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Radiological Problems with Natural Radioactivity in the Non-Nuclear Industry.

  • Reed G (2019) Yeast technology. Springer, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich AL, Crosby EC (2013) Analysis of reserve pit sludge from unconventional natural gas hydraulic fracturing and drilling operations for the presence of technologically enhanced naturally occurring radioactive material (TENORM). NEW Solut A 23:117–135. https://doi.org/10.2190/ns.23.1.h

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockwell T (1956) Reactor shielding design manual. technical director, naval reactors branch, division of reactor development, United States Atomic Energy Commission. U.S. Department of Energy, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Scot ML (1998) Naturally occurring radioactive materials in non-nuclear industry. In: Proceedings of NORM II 2nd International Symposium. Krefeld, Germany, pp 163–167.

  • Smith KP, Blunt DL, Williams GP, Tebes CL (1996) Radiological dose assessment related to management of naturally occurring radioactive materials generated by the petroleum industry (No. ANL/EAD-2). Argonne National Lab., IL (United States). 10.2172/414355

  • Snavely ES (1989) Radionuclides in produced water-a literature review. Am Pet Inst Publ 5404:1–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Strand T, Lysebo I, Kristensen D, Birovljev A (1997) Deposits of naturally occurring radioactivity in production of oil and natural gas. Radioaktive avleiringer i olje- og gassproduksjon. U.S. Department of Energy, Technical Report NRPA-1997:1

  • Torres L, Yadav OP, Khan E (2018) Risk assessment of human exposure to Ra-226 in oil produced water from the Bakken Shale. Sci Total Environ 626:867–874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turhan Ş, Arikan IH, Demirel H, Güngör N (2011) Radiometric analysis of raw materials and end products in the Turkish ceramics industry. Radiat Phys Chem 80:620–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2011.01.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uğur FA, Turhan Ş, Şahan H, Şahan M, Gören E, Gezer F, Yeğingil Z (2013) Investigation of the activity level and radiological impacts of naturally occurring radionuclides in blast furnace slag. Radiat Prot Dosim 153:502–508. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncs131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfram S (1999) The Mathematica Book, 3rd edn. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Brazilian Nuclear Energy Commission (CNEN), the Civil Engineering Program of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (PEC/COPPE/UFRJ), for supporting the development of this research, as well as FAPERJ, CAPES and CNPQ, important funding research institutions in the state of Rio de Janeiro and Brazil, to reviewers and editors for their suggestions and contributions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Corbiniano Silva.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Silva, C., Heilbron Filho, P.F.L., Pérez Guerrero, J.S. et al. A computational model for estimation of 226Ra and 228Ra concentrations in sludge from petrol exploitation, based on radiation-level measurements on stored packages. Environ Earth Sci 79, 489 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-020-09237-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-020-09237-3

Keywords

Navigation