Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Using shallow groundwater modeling to frame the restoration of a wet prairie in the Oak Openings Region, Ohio, USA: GSSHA model implementation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The hydrologic characteristics of the Oak Openings Region in northwest Ohio, USA, a globally rare ecosystem are not well understood. Currently, the Oak Openings supports globally rare oak savanna and wet prairie habitats. The wet prairies in the region have been drained by ditches and encroached by invasive plants, which have altered the natural flow making it an unusually variable and artificial system. A shallow groundwater model was implemented using the Gridded Surface Subsurface Hydrologic Analysis (GSSHA) software to simulate continuous, long-term groundwater and surface water interaction in a small subwatershed in the Oak Openings Region. The implemented GSSHA model simulates physical processes such as infiltration, evapotranspiration, snowmelt, overland flow, and interaction of groundwater with ditches. The model was calibrated using a time series of water table elevations collected in the field. Although the model tends to slightly underestimate water table elevations (mean and standard deviation percent differences of less than 1%), statistical analysis indicate a good fit between observed and simulated water table elevations (Nash Sutcliffe Efficiency Index of 0.78). The model would be a useful tool for the preservation of natural areas such as wet prairies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abella SR, Jaeger JF, Gehring DH, Jacksy RG, Menard KS, High K (2001) Restoring historic plant communities in the Oak Openings region of northwest Ohio. Ecol Restor 19:155–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajami H, Evans JP, McCabe MF, Stisen S (2014) Reducing the spin-up time of integrated surface water–groundwater models. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 18:5169–5179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) FAO irrigation and drainage paper no. 56. Crop evapotranspiration. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MP, Woessner WW (1992) The role of the postaudit in model validation. Adv Water Resour 15:167–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aquaveo LLC (2016) WMS, The Watershed Modeling System (2016), version 10.0.13, Provo, UT. http://www.aquaveo.com/WMS

  • Bachmat Y (1978) Utilization of numerical groundwater models for water resource management (vol 78, no. 12). Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory

  • Becker RH, Zmijewski KA, Crail T (2013) Seeing the forest for the invasives: mapping buckthorn in the Oak openings. Biol Invasions 15:315–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulton AJ, Findlay S, Marmonier P et al (1998) The functional significance of the hyporheic zone in streams and rivers. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29:59–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer LG, Vankat JL (2004) Description of vegetation of the oak openings of northwestern Ohio at the time of Euro-American settlement. Ohio J Sci 104:76–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow VT (1959) Open channel hydraulics. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen JE (1986) Population forecasts and confidence intervals for Sweden: a comparison of model-based and empirical approaches. Demography 23:105–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Angelo DJ, Webster JR, Gregory SV, Meyer JL (1993) Transient storage in Appalachian and Cascade mountain streams as related to hydraulic characteristics. J North Am Benthol Soc 12:223–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dent JB, Blackie MJ (1979) Model-Evaluation. Systems simulation in agriculture. Springer, London, pp 94–117

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Downer CW, Ogden FL (2004) GSSHA: model to simulate diverse stream flow producing processes. J Hydrol Eng 9:161–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downer CW, James WF, Byrd A, Eggers GW (2002a) Gridded surface subsurface hydrologic analysis (GSSHA) model simulation of hydrologic conditions and restoration scenarios for the Judicial Ditch 31 Watershed, Minnesota. DTIC Document

  • Downer CW, Ogden FL, Martin WD, Harmon RS (2002b) Theory, development, and applicability of the surface water hydrologic model CASC2D. Hydrol Process 16:255–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downer CW, Pradhan NR, Skahill BE et al (2014) Simulating the effects of drainage and agriculture on hydrology and sediment in the Minnesota River Basin. In: AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, pp 1166

  • Elderhorst WIM (1984) The role of modelling in the development of African groundwater resources. IAHS-AISH Publ, pp 185–191

  • Eyster T (2013) Stream restoration on the Princeton University campus. Undergraduate Senior Thesis, Princeton University

  • Findlay S (1995) Importance of surface-subsurface exchange in stream ecosystems: the hyporheic zone. Limnol Oceanogr 40:159–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Follum ML, Downer CW (2013) Snow water equivalent modeling capabilities of the GSSHA watershed model (No. ERDC/CHL-TR-13-4). Engineer Research and Development Center, Coastal and Hydraulic Laboratory, Vicksburg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth JL (1970) A geologist looks at the natural vegetation map of Ohio. Ohio J Sci 70:180–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner R, Haase G (2004) Plant communities of the Oak Openings. In: Grigore MT (ed) Living in the Oak openings: a homeowner’s guide to one of the world’s last great places. The nature conservancy. Homewood Press, Toledo, pp 11–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomezdelcampo E, Coode K (2013) Hydrologic Monitoring of a wet prairie restoration in the Oak Openings Region, Ohio, USA. In AGU Meeting of the Americas Abstracts, pp 71

  • Gowdish LC (2007) An improved Green-Ampt soil infiltration and redistribution method and its application to 1-dimensional and quasi 3-dimensional (point source) flow domains. Dissertation, University of Florida

  • Grigore MT (2004) Geology and its role in plant communities of the Oak Openings Region. In: Grigore MT (ed) Living in the Oak Openings: a homeowner’s guide to one of the world’s last great places. The Nature Conservancy. Homewood Press, Toledo, pp 5–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey JW, Bencala KE (1993) The effect of streambed topography on surface-subsurface water exchange in mountain catchments. Water Resour Res 29:89–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heneghan L, Fatemi F, Umek L et al (2006) The invasive shrub European buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica, L.) alters soil properties in Midwestern US woodlands. Appl Soil Ecol 32:142–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu L-T, Wang Z-J, Tian W, Zhao J-S (2009) Coupled surface water–groundwater model and its application in the Arid Shiyang River basin, China. Hydrol Process 23:2033–2044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain SK, Sudheer KP (2008) Fitting of hydrologic models: a close look at the Nash–Sutcliffe index. J Hydrol Eng 13:981–986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins RN (2006) The uses of GSSHA to model groundwater-surface water interaction. Master’s Thesis, Brigham Young University

  • Jobson HE, Harbaugh AW (1999) Modifications to the diffusion analogy surface-water flow model (DAFLOW) for coupling to the modular finite-difference ground-water flow model (MODFLOW). US Geological Survey Open-File Report, pp 99–217

  • Julien PY, Saghafian B, Ogden FL (1995) Raster-based hydrologic modeling of spatially varied surface runoff. J Am Water Res Assoc 31:523–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause P, Boyle DP, Bäse F (2005) Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment. Adv Geosci 5:89–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson E. Wu J, McCool D (2004) Continuous Frozen Ground Index (CFGI) as an indicator for high erosion frozen soil events: Washington State University. Center for Multiphase Environmental Research Technical Report

  • Lautz LK, Siegel DI (2006) Modeling surface and ground water mixing in the hyporheic zone using MODFLOW and MT3D. Adv Water Resour 29:1618–1633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lautz LK, Siegel DI, Bauer RL (2006) Impact of debris dams on hyporheic interaction along a semi-arid stream. Hydrol Process 20:183–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legates DR, McCabe GJ (1999) Evaluating the use of “goodness-of-fit” measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resour Res 35:233–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsik M, Waylen P (2006) An application of the distributed hydrologic model CASC2D to a tropical montane watershed. J Hydrol 330:481–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer DG, Butler DG (1993) Statistical validation. Ecol Model 68:21–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayfield H (1969) Changes in the natural history of the Toledo region since the coming of the white man. Toledo Area Aborig Res Club Bull 1:11–31

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald MG, Harbaugh AW (1984) A modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model. US Geological Survey Open-File Report, pp 83–875

  • McElwee CD, Yukler MA (1978) Sensitivity of groundwater models with respect to variations in transmissivity and storage. Water Resour Res 14:451–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molnau M, Bissell VC (1983) A continuous frozen ground index for flood forecasting. In: Proceedings 51st Annual Meeting Western Snow Conference. Canadian Water Resources Assoc. Cambridge, Ont, pp 109–119

  • Morrice JA, Valett HM, Dahm CN, Campana ME (1997) Alluvial characteristics, groundwater–surface water exchange and hydrological retention in headwater streams. Hydrol Process 11:253–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moseley EL (1928) Flora of the Oak Openings. In: Proc. Ohio Academy of Sciences Special Paper, No. 20, vol 8, pp 81–134

  • Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—a discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10:282–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemeth MS, Wilcox WM, Solo-Gabriele HM (2000) Evaluation of the use of reach transmissivity to quantify leakage beneath Levee 31N, Miami-Dade County, Florida. US Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 00-4066

  • Ogden FL, Byrd AR, Downer CW, Johnson BE (2008) TMDL watershed analysis with the physics-based hydrologic, sediment transport, and contaminant transport model GSSHA. In: ASCE World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2008. https://doi.org/10.1061/40976(316)450

  • Palmer WC (1965) Meteorological drought. US Department of Commerce, Weather Bureau Res. Paper, pp 45

  • Picard RR, Cook RD (1984) Cross-validation of regression models. J Am Stat Assoc 79:575–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Restrepo JI, Montoya AM, Obeysekera J (1998) A wetland simulation module for the MODFLOW ground water model. Ground Water 36:764–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schetter TA, Root KV (2011) Assessing an imperiled oak savanna landscape in northwestern Ohio using Landsat data. Nat Areas J 31:118–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sears PB (1926) The natural vegetation of Ohio II. The prairies. Ohio J Sci 26:128–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Shade JW, Valkenberg N (1975) Comparison of base flow and groundwater chemistry, Oak openings sand, Lucas County, Ohio. Ohio J Sci 75:138–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaeffer DL (1980) A model evaluation methodology applicable to environmental assessment models. Ecol Model 8:275–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel JS (1972) Development and accuracy of projections of population and households in the United States. Demography 9:51–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith SK (1987) Tests of forecast accuracy and bias for county population projections. J Am Stat Assoc 82:991–1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith RE, Corradini C, Melone F (1993) Modeling infiltration for multistorm runoff events. Water Resour Res 29:133–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swain ED (1994) Implementation and use of direct-flow connections in a coupled ground-water and surface-water model. Ground Water 32:139–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swain ED, Wexler EJ (1996) A coupled surface-water and ground-water flow model (MODBRANCH) for simulation of stream-aquifer interaction. US Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations Report 06-A6

  • Tryon CA, Easterly NW (1975) Plant communities of the Irwin Prairie and adjacent wooded areas. Castanea 201–213

  • USDA SCS (1980) US Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service, Soil Survey of Lucas County, Ohio. Washington, DC

  • USGS NLCD (2011) US Geological Survey National Land Cover Database http://www.mrlc.gov/nlcd2011.php. Accessed 21 Oct 2014

  • Weston DM, Skahill BE, Downer CW et al (2015) Gridded surface subsurface hydrologic analysis modeling for analysis of flood design features at the Picayune Strand restoration project. In: ASCE World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2015. pp 1500–1511

  • Willmott CJ (1981) On the validation of models. Phys Geogr 2:184–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willmott CJ (1984) On the evaluation of model performance in physical geography. In: Gaile GL, Willmott CJ (eds) Spatial statistics and models. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 443–460

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Willmott CJ, Ackleson SG, Davis RE, Feddema JJ, Klink KM, Legates DR, O’Donnell J, Rowe CM (1985) Statistics for the evaluation and comparison of models. J Geophys Res Oceans 90:8995–9005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wroblicky GJ, Campana ME, Valett HM, Dahm CN (1998) Seasonal variation in surface-subsurface water exchange and lateral hyporheic area of two stream-aquifer systems. Water Resour Res 34:317–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhai J, Su B, Krysanova V, Vetter T, GAO C, Jiang T (2010) Spatial variation and trends in PDSI and SPI indices and their relation to streamflow in 10 large regions of China. J Clim 23:649–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work for this manuscript was performed while the first author, Dayal Buddika Wijayarathne, was a graduate student at Bowling Green State University. Funding from The Nature Conservancy for another project (OHFO-GLRI-BGSU-10/10 − 02) allowed for the collection of field data used in the calibration and testing of the GSSHA model in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L8, Canada

    Dayal Buddika Wijayarathne

  2. School of Earth, Environment and Society, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH, 43403, USA

    Enrique Gomezdelcampo

Authors
  1. Dayal Buddika Wijayarathne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Enrique Gomezdelcampo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enrique Gomezdelcampo.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wijayarathne, D.B., Gomezdelcampo, E. Using shallow groundwater modeling to frame the restoration of a wet prairie in the Oak Openings Region, Ohio, USA: GSSHA model implementation. Environ Earth Sci 78, 216 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8208-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8208-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation